Hi all,
This should be a rather typical question: I want to upgrade the weakest part of my home computer.
First here my current setup:
■CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Dual core, 3.2 Ghz)
■Memory: 4 GiB DDR2 800 MHz
■Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 (Socket: AM2+)
■Graphics: Zotac GeForce 9400GT 1024MiB DDR3
■PSU: 450 W (just for context)
My plan with this PC:
■Ever so often I want to update specific parts. That means, a new part has to last at least four years.
■I want best performance for money. Neither am I interested in spending double for just a tiny bit more power nor do I want to update every part every year, just because I get the cheapest low-end hardware available.
■One important aspect is that I want silent parts. This obviously means that they shouldn't produce too much heat, i.e. shouldn't be too power-consuming.
What I do with it:
It is my general purpose home-computer I use in the evening. Of course I do the usual stuff which doesn't really strain hardware, especially as I don't use any of Xfce's graphics gimmicks. And there is the odd compiling (e.g. when Wine needs a patch again) and some gaming (Skyrim being the most current) which probably is the part which should define the hardware. However I'm not really interested in high-end graphics, the new part should just be able to run anything four years in the future, even if it's on lowest settings.
Now for the the fun parts. Here I begin speculating and hope that you can tell me that I'm right (or not, if I'd know much about this, I wouldn't have got to ask). First: Which part should be exchanged? (Remember that the part I keep will probably have got to last another one to two years.)
First: Memory is unlikely as I would have to invest in DDR2 until I get a new motherboard. And 4 GiB suffices anyway. The motherboard seems fine to me, too. That leaves only two candidates: CPU (with Motherboard+Memory if I'm unlucky not to choose an AM3 processor) and GPU. Playing Skyrim I notice that the processor loads never exceeds 140% (with Xfce taking up less than 1%). Also those loads aren't really that high with games, the GPU being more important. While I do some CPU-intensive stuff, it doesn't bother me that much if it takes 30 minutes instead of 20. That leaves Graphics and let's face it, my current card doesn't really perform that well. The 1024 MiB may be fine, but if the GPU can't process all that stuff? While I can't really observe its work load it's my number one candidate why I can run Skyrim only at lowest settings.
My conclusion: A new graphics card.
Which one?
First: I don't use ATI/AMD due to Nvidias better driver support. That may be not true any more but I don't feel like experimenting. It certainly spares me the hassle of comparing. I make it short, I think of a GeForce GTX 560 (approx. $215-€160). What are its competitors? The 560 Ti is out of the question as it costs one third more. The 460 on the other hand isn't really cheaper than the 560. And finally there is the 550 Ti and here I'm not really certain. It costs one third less (approx. $150-€114). Maybe the ratio performance for money is better there? Anyway I already have my eye on a Gigabyte GTX 560 OC 1024 MiB GDDR5 GV-N56GOC-1GI (if I don't change my mind any more).
That's it (finally). So: Am I right with choosing the GPU? Is the 560 the right choice or should I rather find a nice 550 Ti?
This should be a rather typical question: I want to upgrade the weakest part of my home computer.
First here my current setup:
■CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Dual core, 3.2 Ghz)
■Memory: 4 GiB DDR2 800 MHz
■Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 (Socket: AM2+)
■Graphics: Zotac GeForce 9400GT 1024MiB DDR3
■PSU: 450 W (just for context)
My plan with this PC:
■Ever so often I want to update specific parts. That means, a new part has to last at least four years.
■I want best performance for money. Neither am I interested in spending double for just a tiny bit more power nor do I want to update every part every year, just because I get the cheapest low-end hardware available.
■One important aspect is that I want silent parts. This obviously means that they shouldn't produce too much heat, i.e. shouldn't be too power-consuming.
What I do with it:
It is my general purpose home-computer I use in the evening. Of course I do the usual stuff which doesn't really strain hardware, especially as I don't use any of Xfce's graphics gimmicks. And there is the odd compiling (e.g. when Wine needs a patch again) and some gaming (Skyrim being the most current) which probably is the part which should define the hardware. However I'm not really interested in high-end graphics, the new part should just be able to run anything four years in the future, even if it's on lowest settings.
Now for the the fun parts. Here I begin speculating and hope that you can tell me that I'm right (or not, if I'd know much about this, I wouldn't have got to ask). First: Which part should be exchanged? (Remember that the part I keep will probably have got to last another one to two years.)
First: Memory is unlikely as I would have to invest in DDR2 until I get a new motherboard. And 4 GiB suffices anyway. The motherboard seems fine to me, too. That leaves only two candidates: CPU (with Motherboard+Memory if I'm unlucky not to choose an AM3 processor) and GPU. Playing Skyrim I notice that the processor loads never exceeds 140% (with Xfce taking up less than 1%). Also those loads aren't really that high with games, the GPU being more important. While I do some CPU-intensive stuff, it doesn't bother me that much if it takes 30 minutes instead of 20. That leaves Graphics and let's face it, my current card doesn't really perform that well. The 1024 MiB may be fine, but if the GPU can't process all that stuff? While I can't really observe its work load it's my number one candidate why I can run Skyrim only at lowest settings.
My conclusion: A new graphics card.
Which one?
First: I don't use ATI/AMD due to Nvidias better driver support. That may be not true any more but I don't feel like experimenting. It certainly spares me the hassle of comparing. I make it short, I think of a GeForce GTX 560 (approx. $215-€160). What are its competitors? The 560 Ti is out of the question as it costs one third more. The 460 on the other hand isn't really cheaper than the 560. And finally there is the 550 Ti and here I'm not really certain. It costs one third less (approx. $150-€114). Maybe the ratio performance for money is better there? Anyway I already have my eye on a Gigabyte GTX 560 OC 1024 MiB GDDR5 GV-N56GOC-1GI (if I don't change my mind any more).
That's it (finally). So: Am I right with choosing the GPU? Is the 560 the right choice or should I rather find a nice 550 Ti?