Digital camera comparison (reposted as a new thread)

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Lin Chung wrote:
> Rosanne Cleveland-King wote:
> > http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.asp
> > found this site to compare digital cameras side by side. You have
> > the capability to choose each one you want to compare. I was
> > comparing the Fuji Finepix F10 and the Nikon Coolpix S1, as
> > I am looking for a super small camera that is fast and has a large
> > viewfinder.
> I have just been doing exactly the same. With its low light capability,
> the FinePix F10 stands out from a bunch of super small cameras
> that are fast and have large viewfinders, and is a truly remarkable
> pocket-sized camera....
> http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/c [...] eview-.htm



For those not convinced the power of F10 at ISO 1600, i.e. shooting hand
held at night time without using flash, here are some stills from Canon
SD200, Canon SD400, Fuji F10 and Nikon Coolpix 7900:
http://www.pbase.com/koo22/ultra_compact_test_shots
My search for a pocketable all weather 'Personal Photographic Assistant' has
come to an end. Probably!?

--
Lin Chung.
[The Water Margins of Liang Shan Po were at the time of the Sung dynasty.
Replace that with "ntlworld" for emails.]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Sun, 01 May 2005 17:54:54 GMT, Lin Chung wrote:

> For those not convinced the power of F10 at ISO 1600, i.e. shooting hand
> held at night time without using flash, here are some stills from Canon
> SD200, Canon SD400, Fuji F10 and Nikon Coolpix 7900:
> http://www.pbase.com/koo22/ultra_compact_test_shots
> My search for a pocketable all weather 'Personal Photographic Assistant' has
> come to an end. Probably!?

Other than having 6mp vs. the Finepix Z1's 5mp, how else does the
F10 differ from it? In a brief mention of it I see only that the Z1
is 18.3 mm thin (no mention of the F10's dimensions) and that they
both were designed to be more effective at high ISOs. If their
sensors are the same size, the Z1 might have a bit less noise.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

ASAAR wrote:
> Lin Chung wrote:
> > For those not convinced the power of F10 at ISO 1600, i.e. shooting
> > hand held at night time without using flash, here are some stills from
> > Canon SD200, Canon SD400, Fuji F10 and Nikon Coolpix 7900:
> > http://www.pbase.com/koo22/ultra_compact_test_shots
> Other than having 6mp vs. the Finepix Z1's 5mp, how else does the
> F10 differ from it? In a brief mention of it I see only that the Z1
> is 18.3 mm thin (no mention of the F10's dimensions) and that they
> both were designed to be more effective at high ISOs. If their
> sensors are the same size, the Z1 might have a bit less noise.



Z1 has a 1/2.5" sensor. This is confirmed in a review/report of Z1 from
Japan, where the new camera was released on 2005-04-25.
http://www.livingroom.org.au/photo [...] 1_zoom.php
http://www.itmedia.co.jp/lifestyle [...] ws064.html (in
Japanese). The description of the SuperCCD is at the start of the first
paragraph on page 3.

--
Lin Chung.
[The Water Margins of Liang Shan Po were at the time of the Sung dynasty.
Replace that with "ntlworld" for emails.]