Search
Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Closed

Benchmarks, benchmarks, we want to see benchmarks...

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
Graphics card Authority

Any and all benchies welcome, from high to low it doesn't matter.

Don't be afraid this isn't a laughing contest nor a pissing contest, just a place people can go a see how different systems perform.

Requirements:

System specs, benchmark running and results.

I7-2600K @4.5ghz, 16gb RAM 12800 CL9, XFX 6950 CF @920/1375 (x8, x8) 1920 X 1080, Intel 120gb 510 series SSD, HX1050



Some benchmarks:
3Dmark (all)
PCMark7 (PCMark5 for Vista users)
SiSoftware Sandra
Kombustor
Furmark
Geekbench
Cinebench
Game bechies (all)
Unigine
Novabench

More about : benchmarks benchmarks benchmarks

Register or log in to remove
Related ressources
Ask the community
Graphics card Authority

Quote:
get my system specs listed and resolutions I'll be running..

unit 1:
i5-760 @ 3.4GHz / 4GB RAM 1600MHz CL8 / SLi NGTX 460 HAWK @ 780/1560 (x8, x8) / Agility 2 90GB SSD / 900-watt RF Silver 80+
1280 x 1024 and/or 3840 x 1024 (2D surround) - resolutions

unit 2:
965BE @ 3.4GHz (stock) / 8GB 1600MHz CL9 @ (1333) / EVGA GTX 460 SSC+ @ 850/1700 (x16) / G. Skill Pro 60GB SSD / 700-watt Sentey
1600 x 900 and/or 1920 x 1080p - resolutions

just cause 2, metro 2033 are a few game benches in particular.


So you did get the Metro bench... cool
Graphics card Authority

Quote:
as soon as I get it..

tropics and heaven settings:
API: DX11,
Stereo 3D: Disabled,
Ambient Occlusion:yes,
Reflection: yes,
Shaders: High,
Anisotropy: 16,
Anti-aliasing: 4x,
Full Screen: Yes,
Textures: High...
Resolution: 1080p...

I personally run PhysX with my games, I like the eye-candy..


I want to see :whistle: 
Graphics card Authority

jjb8675309 said:
thats a great score but personally it bothers me that the minimum fps actually goes down
compared to a single 6950


Wow you're right... I actually completely overlooked that. CF latency maybe? I'll retest after I feed my kids.
Graphics card Authority

jjb8675309 said:
thats a great score but personally it bothers me that the minimum fps actually goes down
compared to a single 6950


re-ran it with exactly the same settings and the results look better...

... I have an animated background and while I can't remember if it was enabled or not it could explain the min. fps anomaly(??).
Graphics card Authority

Quote:
i5-760 @ 3.4GHz - SLi GTX 460 Hawks - SSD

(3840 x 1024 full res.)
batman: arkham asylum
benmark results (fps)
min - 39
max - 79
ave - 73
----------------------------
definitely playable..:D 


:o 
Did the game come with a bench or did you have to use a 3rd party app?
Graphics card Master

Quote:
i5-760 @ 3.4GHz - SLi GTX 460 Hawks - SSD

(3840 x 1024 full res.)
batman: arkham asylum
benmark results (fps)
min - 39
max - 79
ave - 73
----------------------------
definitely playable..:D 



Im thinking that 3840X1024 must be a good deal more demanding than 1200p

what where your exact settings? I will do one on my system..
Graphics card Master

Well I tried the Heaven bench
What a lesson in humility that was LOL
At full settings
min 2 fps
avg 4
max 8
prettiest slideshow I ever saw :) 

to be playable at full settings on Heaven
I would have to run it at either 1024x768
or 800x600

I can do DX9 at 1920x1080 2x 2x
and get @
12 min
22 avg
45 max
which is watchable but probably not playable

lets hope that the HD 7670 low profile comes out soon



Will somebody please run the Lightsmark bench?

http://dee.cz/lightsmark/

I know it is older but you guys have got to check it out
really wild graphics
Graphics card Authority

Found out Batman Arkham Asylum, Hawx and Mafia 2 offer benchmarks with the demos through steam. First I downloaded Batman but for some reason it won't run(??) and don't want to waste time trying to play with it. Ran Mafia 2 with high settings, no phyx (look below) and did another run with phyx set to high and the frames were laughable... avg of 24 fps! Huh?





@King

I'll run that bench for ya...

Edit: by the way Mafia 2 is an ugly, ugly game...
Graphics card Master

RussK1 said:
Found out Batman Arkham Asylum, Hawx and Mafia 2 offer benchmarks with the demos through steam. First I downloaded Batman but for some reason it won't run(??) and don't want to waste time trying to play with it. Ran Mafia 2 with high settings, no phyx (look below) and did another run with phyx set to high and the frames were laughable... avg of 24 fps! Huh?

http://i1081.photobucket.com/albums/j357/russwood8814/2011-10-24_00002.jpg

http://i1081.photobucket.com/albums/j357/russwood8814/2011-10-24_00001.jpg

@King

I'll run that bench for ya...

Edit: by the way Mafia 2 is an ugly, ugly game...




Cool thanks
You will get a laugh at your FPS
it is older so you will have a incredible FPS

well as you probably know when you physx with ATI/AMD cards
the physx load is on your CPU usually

with a 2600k 2xHD6950 getting 24FPS means that is a hard bench

It would be interesting to see Mal with the Physix setup (460/250?)
and compare

I will go run Lightsmark
It will make me feel better after that horrible Heaven bench
(seriously why does ATI market HD 5670 as DX11 card-right now best I can do is 1280x1024 Very High Metro 2033 DX11
and that is borderline playable FPS)

Did anybody read Toms Rage review article on home page?
auto adjusts to get 30 or 60FPS
Dont want to go OT
so PM to chat about it


Graphics card Authority

Quote:
280.26
965BE + 460 SSC+
----------------------
http://i1130.photobucket.com/albums/m529/malmental/28026.png

higher min FPS and better overall score than using 275.33 drivers.


I actually have the opposite... I tried catalyst 11.10 preview drivers and my fps took a nose dive; rolled back to 11.9 and fps increased 10+fps... downloaded the application profile for BF3 and this negatively affected fps. What gives AMD? So, I removed the profile and decided I'm not going to buy BF3 and just wait for MW3.

edit: that's a really good score by the way...
Graphics card Master

I upgraded to 285.62 from 285.38 beta I believe. However, I am speaking purely about BF3 as I haven't tried it on any other games yet. In BF3 it seemed to net me another 7 fps or so on high (auto) settings @ 1200p so basically the game never seems to stray below 50 with these settings which is nice imo

Hey,can anyone run a benchmark of GTA-4 on this specs:
CPU:AMD Phenom II x4 955 3.2Ghz
GPU:Sapphire 6870 1GB
RAM: 8GB RAM DDR3 1333 Mhz

on this settings:
1680 x 1050 Res
and all other settings to max(Use Razor 1911 crack for full functionality of graphics settings)
Graphics card Authority

Quote:
side note:
thinking of selling GTX 460's in SLi and get a single GTX 560Ti or GTX 570.
run it single or with a temporary PhysX card until I get the SLi back.
that way I'll still have three monitors.


570... if you're going to do it, do it right.


Quote:
GTA IV will run like crap on that hardware as it requires a mega fast cpu and a ton of gpu horsepower with lots of vram (1500MB upwards)

if it is radeon hd 6950 2gb :o 
Graphics card Authority

Quote:
another game to buy..
thanks man. :( 

I skipped it.


I didn't buy it until they released the patch for dx11 and high res. textures. Playing the game on Ultra in high tesselation areas the 6950's beg for mercy! Really.
Graphics card Master

Quote:
side note:
thinking of selling GTX 460's in SLi and get a single GTX 560Ti or GTX 570.
run it single or with a temporary PhysX card until I get the SLi back.
that way I'll still have three monitors.



so what your saying is your trying to do a trade... lol
Register or log in to remove
 
Ask the community
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!