Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox (
More info?)
"Boody Bandit" <boodybandit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GPmdnXTZ4LFKEhXfRVn-rw@suscom.com...
>
> "The Don" <the_don@home.com.au> wrote in message
> news:42888319$0$8125$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Mattinglyfan" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote in message
>> news:eKGdnWiY36kbjxXfRVn-2Q@comcast.com...
>> >
>> > "Rowdy J" <jkehr@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> > news:%2Uhe.255$kj7.198@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>> >> Very smart move. That will definitely get the attention of a lot of
>> >> gamers right around the time Sony is clammoring to get their attention
>> >> diverted to the PS3.
>> >>
>> >
>> > People getting the PS3 will not divert their purchase because of a
> $60-$70
>> > game.
>>
>>
>> Your missing the point, they will take away some of the media coverage
> from
>> the PS3 launch which may impact on borderline buyers.
>
> You mean a handful of people out of the nearly 100 million userbase of
> Sony's console might not get a PS3 because of one title released on the
> 360?
> WOW! Gates is a genius.
>
>
Whether you like it or not, he is a genius....... you don't get your product
in the hands of 90% of your chosen demographic (PC Owners) by being a
stupid.
If the PS3 launch was on its own then Sony would have free airplay for its
product, however, many pages will now be taken up with the sequel of the
worlds biggest ever game.............. that is also an impact that needs to
be acknowledged beyond the possible capture of market share from the
borderline buyers.