Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Matt Silberstein wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005 23:44:12 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
>
in
wrote:
>
>
>>Matt Silberstein wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 14:15:21 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
>>>
in
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Mark² wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Experience indicates that the elderly hispanic lady shouldn't be
>>>>>>bothers to remove her shoes...while 30-year-old Mohamed with the
>>>>>>middle eastern accent walks straight through behind her.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>How do you distinguish between an elderly hispanic woman and an elderly
>>>>>woman from
>>>>>the Middle East? And what do you do about the pale white elderly woman who
>>>>>sympathizes with terrorist causes? The two times I've been selected at
>>>>>random for an extra search I didn't have to remove my shoes (the most
>>>>>recent was 1/04), but when I have had to remove them so has everyone else.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I seldom remove my shoes, because I KNOW they have no metal in them, and
>>>>won't set off the alarm. But if requested to take them off, they are
>>>>responsible for any discomfort their nose suffers... Grin.
>>>
>>>
>>>Really? You actually threaten those people? I have had to remove my
>>>shoes on almost every flight I have taken in the last several years.
>>>Because they ask me to, not because they set something off. BTW, what
>>>does metal in your shoe have to do with anything? Do you actually not
>>>know why they have people remove their shoes?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yes, because some check for nitrates. Others don't, they only check
>>those that seem to have metal in them, presumably to prevent someone
>>hiding a blade in one. I have only had to remove my shoes a couple of
>>times.
>
>
> I gather the threaten comment was just Usenet bravado. Me, I have
> taken to wearing sandals when I fly. More comfortable on the plane and
> easier to remove/replace at inspection.
>
>
I am not sure where the word 'threaten' came from. I saw no threat,
either specific, or implied in my comments.
--
Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.