Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 06 May 2005 09:26:29 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
in
wrote:
>Steve wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ron Hunter wrote:
>>
>>> They may seek to pass as Nuns or Priests. Do you think? Now tell me
>>> why I find this unlikely....
>>
>>
>> Do tell. I'd think all those robes would be great for hiding stuff.
>>
>>
>Sure, they would be. But how likely is it to find a Muslim in a
>catholic church? Do you know why?
Which is not the issue. The question is whether or not they would be
willing to dress deceptively. Do you have evidence that they would not
do that?
--
Matt Silberstein
All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 06 May 2005 18:59:50 -0400, Matt Silberstein <Matt
Silberstein@echoforum.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 May 2005 09:26:29 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
> in
> wrote:
>>Steve wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ron Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>>> They may seek to pass as Nuns or Priests. Do you think? Now tell me
>>>> why I find this unlikely....
>>>
>>>
>>> Do tell. I'd think all those robes would be great for hiding stuff.
>>>
>>>
>>Sure, they would be. But how likely is it to find a Muslim in a
>>catholic church? Do you know why?
>Which is not the issue. The question is whether or not they would be
>willing to dress deceptively. Do you have evidence that they would not
>do that?
When in doubt, ask the opposition to prove a neative. It's
always fun and requires no use of brainpower.
But just for giggles, please explain why someone who is
willing to take themselves and hundreds of others down in flames would
shrink in horror from the concept of wearing the enemy's clothing for
a few hours, especially if it would greatly enhance the chance of
evading discovery.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Tue, 10 May 2005 00:58:47 GMT, in rec.photo.digital ,
kashe@sonic.net in <bi1081pvqratreujblc81e332t89cpicam@4ax.com>
wrote:
>On Fri, 06 May 2005 18:59:50 -0400, Matt Silberstein <Matt
>Silberstein@echoforum.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 06 May 2005 09:26:29 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
>> in
>> wrote:
>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ron Hunter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They may seek to pass as Nuns or Priests. Do you think? Now tell me
>>>>> why I find this unlikely....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do tell. I'd think all those robes would be great for hiding stuff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Sure, they would be. But how likely is it to find a Muslim in a
>>>catholic church? Do you know why?
>>Which is not the issue. The question is whether or not they would be
>>willing to dress deceptively. Do you have evidence that they would not
>>do that?
>
> When in doubt, ask the opposition to prove a neative. It's
>always fun and requires no use of brainpower.
>
> But just for giggles, please explain why someone who is
>willing to take themselves and hundreds of others down in flames would
>shrink in horror from the concept of wearing the enemy's clothing for
>a few hours, especially if it would greatly enhance the chance of
>evading discovery.
You have gotten confused. Ron said they would not dress as a nun, etc.
I am asking him to defend his assertion with some evidence.
--
Matt Silberstein
All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Matt Silberstein wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2005 00:58:47 GMT, in rec.photo.digital ,
> kashe@sonic.net in <bi1081pvqratreujblc81e332t89cpicam@4ax.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 06 May 2005 18:59:50 -0400, Matt Silberstein <Matt
>>Silberstein@echoforum.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 06 May 2005 09:26:29 -0500, in rec.photo.digital , Ron Hunter
>>>in
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ron Hunter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>They may seek to pass as Nuns or Priests. Do you think? Now tell me
>>>>>>why I find this unlikely....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Do tell. I'd think all those robes would be great for hiding stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sure, they would be. But how likely is it to find a Muslim in a
>>>>catholic church? Do you know why?
>>>
>>>Which is not the issue. The question is whether or not they would be
>>>willing to dress deceptively. Do you have evidence that they would not
>>>do that?
>>
>> When in doubt, ask the opposition to prove a neative. It's
>>always fun and requires no use of brainpower.
>>
>> But just for giggles, please explain why someone who is
>>willing to take themselves and hundreds of others down in flames would
>>shrink in horror from the concept of wearing the enemy's clothing for
>>a few hours, especially if it would greatly enhance the chance of
>>evading discovery.
>
>
> You have gotten confused. Ron said they would not dress as a nun, etc.
> I am asking him to defend his assertion with some evidence.
>
They've never cared much for the formalities of a dress code. If they
did, their warriors would be wearing a uniform on the battle field.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.