Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Question about Radeon HD 6850

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
November 1, 2011 10:49:46 PM

I want to purchase a Radeon HD 6850 but only have a 1.0 PCI-e slot on my mobo.

PCI-e is suppose to be backwards compatible and the difference in performance is negligible, BUT whereas 2.0 cards in 1.0 slot work fine - I've read where people have had issues using 2.1 cards in 1.0 PCI-e.

My question is this, do they make 6850's in 2.0 PCI-e?

I've found an 6850 on Amazon that state it is 2.0 but I'm thinking it may just be a typo.
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-6850-PCIE-Video-100315L/...

Can anyone verify this?

More about : question radeon 6850

a c 189 U Graphics card
November 2, 2011 12:37:53 AM

Take a look at this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
The same model and it stated that the card is 2.1 pcie interface.

But wait, you've said that your board is 1.0, what is your CPU? Because it would be wasting money/overkill to run 6850 with dual-core cpu.
Tell us your FULL specs: CPU? RAM? Mobo? PSU? Monitor?
m
0
l
a c 141 U Graphics card
November 2, 2011 1:12:46 AM

All 6850s are PCI-E 2.1. Some of the older PCI-E 1.0 boards have compatibility problems with PCI-E 2.1, but most 1.0 boards will take a 2.1 card fine. Most of the time the problems are with the Socket 939 boards from AMD, and the really early LGA775 boards, the ones that tend to only support Pentium 4s and Pentium Ds. Check your board's manufacturer for a BIOS update, some of the boards that have this problem have had BIOS updates released to resolve this issue.

It is not a waste to run a 6850 with a dual core CPU. Most games do not have great multithreading support, and will run just fine on a fast dual core. Tom's Hardware did an article a while back testing an i3 530 with an HD 5850 (which is a bit faster than the 6850) and found no bottlenecking issues with the dual core CPU and a single 5850. You're only likely to hit a CPU bottleneck if you are playing at an extremely low resolution on a CPU intensive title, or you have a slow dual core, like a C2D 2.0 GHz.
m
0
l
Related resources
a c 172 U Graphics card
November 2, 2011 1:26:19 AM

i have a 6850 running on a pcie 1.0 motherboard with a dual core cpu. Its great, except for poorly coded games that only run well with quad core CPU's, like COD black ops.
m
0
l
November 2, 2011 1:34:25 AM

wa1 said:
Take a look at this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
The same model and it stated that the card is 2.1 pcie interface.

But wait, you've said that your board is 1.0, what is your CPU? Because it would be wasting money/overkill to run 6850 with dual-core cpu.
Tell us your FULL specs: CPU? RAM? Mobo? PSU? Monitor?


I'm upgrading CPU from a 6000+ to a Phenom X4 955 (95w). It just came in the mail tonight!

The rest is:
ram - 4 GB Kingston Hyperx
mobo - GA-M57SLI-S4
gpu - 9800 GTX+
psu - 550w Cooler Master RP-550-PCAR
monitor - Sony vx2260wm 1080p

Wanted to upgrade the gpu to nVidia 460 but in a previous thread

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/330790-33-m57sli-mobo...

they suggested I go with a better PSU or a 6850 (I chose the latter).

I'm thinking a 6850 would do fine with a 955 but I'm a novice and don't know if I'm missing something. The issue with the pci-e 2.0 vs 2.1 backwards compatibility came up in that thread, so I wanted to be sure before I ordered it to prevent running into any problems.

Kind of figured it was a typo on Amazon's site.
m
0
l

Best solution

a c 141 U Graphics card
November 2, 2011 1:40:27 AM

There should be no problems running a 2.1 card with that board and CPU. It has been receiving fairly regular BIOS updates up until 2010. If there was a PCI-E 2.1 problem, it probably would have been fixed in one of the newer BIOS revisions. You may have to use one of the newer revisions just to get the Phenom II X4 to work anyway. Edit: You need revision F15E at least for the new CPU to work. I'd say get the card, there is very little chance that you will have a problem.
Share
November 2, 2011 1:51:02 AM

Best answer selected by knightbringr.
m
0
l
November 2, 2011 1:52:41 AM

Thanks alot!

Wasn't sure if I was overlooking anything. Thanks for looking up that info and verifying it.
m
0
l
!