I've been doing a lot of research and I'm at a stalemate. I'm finding equal distribution of people saying timing is more important, bandwidth is more important and lastly people blindly recommending things because it "worked for them" and then the thread dies.
I found this but it doesn't help because we don't know the timings.. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-benchmark-core-i7-3770k,3181-10.html
Then I found this... http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/memory/display/ivy-bridge-ddr3_4.html#sect0
So there IS a performance upgrade going higher than 1600 ram and quite considerably.
My specs are i5-3570k, Giga Z77X-UD3H and my application is 1080 gaming with lots of video rendering with file sizes up to 50+ GB and many times I am rendering and gaming at the same time.
Which ram should I go with? I'm looking for someone who can explain why with IVY bridge in mind and for my applications. I've heard rumors lower timings are better for games and higher bandwidth is better for rendering. I don't know if that's true although, and for that matter by how much and why. I do consider an extra 2 frames significant just for perspective.
I found this but it doesn't help because we don't know the timings.. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-benchmark-core-i7-3770k,3181-10.html
Then I found this... http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/memory/display/ivy-bridge-ddr3_4.html#sect0
So there IS a performance upgrade going higher than 1600 ram and quite considerably.
My specs are i5-3570k, Giga Z77X-UD3H and my application is 1080 gaming with lots of video rendering with file sizes up to 50+ GB and many times I am rendering and gaming at the same time.
Which ram should I go with? I'm looking for someone who can explain why with IVY bridge in mind and for my applications. I've heard rumors lower timings are better for games and higher bandwidth is better for rendering. I don't know if that's true although, and for that matter by how much and why. I do consider an extra 2 frames significant just for perspective.