Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Slow Video Compression

Last response: in CPUs
Share
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 8:43:19 AM

Im Using Handbrake And Windows Movie As Compression Right Now Both Running But It's Slow How Do I Fix This? My CPU Runs At %100 Is This My CPU's Fault?

More about : slow video compression

a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 8:54:40 AM

What settings are u using?

m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 8:54:58 AM

And whats your CPU?
m
0
l
Related resources
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 8:55:37 AM

nikorr said:
And whats your CPU?

1080p, 12000 bit rate, 30 fps and 8120
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 8:58:31 AM

Handbrake will use the CPU @ 100% and its a good thing,

unless u are short on RAM with slow CPU.

U can set priority to lower setting to ease up the CPU.

Default is "normal".

m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:02:21 AM

nikorr said:
Handbrake will use the CPU @ 100% and its a good thing,

unless u are short on RAM with slow CPU.

U can set priority to lower setting to ease up the CPU.

Default is "normal".

I Have 8gb RAM, Is That Good?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:03:11 AM

melikepie said:
1080p, 12000 bit rate, 30 fps and 8120

What Reference frame and Max B-frames?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:03:36 AM

melikepie said:
I Have 8gb RAM, Is That Good?

8GB is OK.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:07:29 AM

What is your OS? W7?

Handbrake version?

m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:08:59 AM

nikorr said:
What is your OS? W7?

Handbrake version?

Windows 7, Yes
Handbrake 0.9.6
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:12:37 AM

What Reference frame and Max B-frames?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:14:02 AM

nikorr said:
What Reference frame and Max B-frames?

In English Please
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:15:58 AM

Click on the advanced tab and on left upper corner, u'll see it : )
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:16:39 AM

BTW, is your CPU OC'd?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:17:07 AM

nikorr said:
Click on the advanced tab and on left upper corner, u'll see it : )

1 Reference 3 B
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:19:24 AM

So, u didn't changed anything yet, right?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:20:14 AM

Where are u going to watch the final video? What device?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:21:23 AM

nikorr said:
Where are u going to watch the final video? What device?

I Did Not Change Anything, Things Might Go On Youtube And I Might Watch Them :) 
What Are Reference Frames?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:26:13 AM

Than u can set -> it will finish faster. It all has to do with compression and detail recognition...

Reference frame 1

Max B-frames 1
m
0
l
a c 478 à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:27:19 AM

Encoding at high resolution will slow down the encoding process.

If you are using the x.264 codec then you should know that it needs a lot of processing power for the encoding process which means it will be relatively slow. If you are using the XviD codec, then the encoding process will not be as slow because that codec requires less processing power. But the end result will not be as good as using x.264.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:28:21 AM

I Might Watch Them :)

OK, on what? LCD tv? What Size?

On Phone devices?

On Computer?

m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:31:16 AM

jaguarskx is right.

AVI quality is low when compared to MKV or MP4.

I assumed that u are encoding in to MKV, so what are u using?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:43:13 AM

nikorr said:
jaguarskx is right.

AVI quality is low when compared to MKV or MP4.

I assumed that u are encoding in to MKV, so what are u using?

MP4
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:44:15 AM

I Might Watch Them :)

OK, on what? LCD tv? What Size?

On Phone devices?

On Computer?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:49:54 AM

nikorr said:
I Might Watch Them :)

OK, on what? LCD tv? What Size?

On Phone devices?

On Computer?

24" LED 1080P
I Might Post One Tommarow :) 
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 9:52:17 AM

On 24inch u should go to 720P

and never see the difference and it would be done 3 times faster : )

BTW, what is the source of the video?
m
0
l
a c 478 à CPUs
May 12, 2012 10:00:25 AM

Unfortunately, I cannot find any benchmarks for blu-ray encoding using the exact same resolution as the blu-ray movie itself. I recommend you do a test; encode a blu-ray movie down to 720p (1280x720) resolution and compare your frame rates to the following:





Source: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-812...

If you get similar results then there is nothing wrong with your system. As mentioned before, the higher the resolution, the slower the encoding time. Encoding using the x.264 codec is pretty slow especially during the 2nd pass. It's the price you must pay if you want the high quality that the x.264 codec can output.

m
0
l
a c 478 à CPUs
May 12, 2012 10:01:38 AM

Of course, your actual encoding performance depends on whatever settings you are using. I would just use default settings for your test.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
May 12, 2012 10:09:56 AM

nikorr said:
On 24inch u should go to 720P

and never see the difference and it would be done 3 times faster : )

BTW, what is the source of the video?

Im Like 1-2 Feet Form It!
Fraps
m
0
l
a c 478 à CPUs
May 12, 2012 10:55:16 AM

$205 was the estimated price AMD would charge for the FX-8120 on it's release date. Some speculated that would be the bulk price or tray price (lots of 1,000).

http://vr-zone.com/articles/report-amd-fx-release-date-...

There has since been price cuts made by AMD in February down to $199.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5595/amd-releases-fx6200-...

Just recently AMD announced another price cut down to $165.

http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012042701_AMD_cuts_...


It's not Newegg's fault you paid $210 4 months ago. If anything blame AMD for cutting their prices in an attempt to attract people to buy their CPUs. In other words, you bought the FX-8120 too soon.
m
0
l
!