GRAND TOTAL : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $529.94
with this type of setup you have all the goodies of high end systems for a cheap price and a Highly capable gaming system of overclocking and you might even have the chance to unlock 2 dormant cores to have a six core CPU, I pretty much think this setup does not ask anything to those from Intel.
Message edited by _Pez_ on 01-30-2012 at 08:16:24 AM
The FX processor OC's well on the stock cooler. The case is a quality unit , the PSU is also good .
The RAM could be improved and still stay in the budget .
A 6770 games at 1080p , but not with highest image settings
Total: $540.8 (Prices include shipping and discounts when available.)
(Generated 2012-01-29 10:42 EST-0500)
50 dollars over budget but i think worth it- if you ever want to crossfire your going to need a more powerful powersupply though. Like 650 to 700 watts-possible this one ? OCZ ModXStream Pro 700W Modular High Performance Power Supply like 20 dollars more after rebate then the 500 watt power supply
The main reason he wants to OC is cause he would likely save some money for the same performance: buying P2 955 and OC instead of buying a P2 980 and leave stock...
BUT, if he can have a better cpu, for the same money even that it won't OC, what's the problem?
As per this review, Picking A Sub-$200 Gaming CPU: FX, An APU, Or A Pentium?, even the OCked FX-4100 @4.2Ghz isn't better than a i3-2100 for gaming. (even considering the 1080p where CPU would be a lesser factor), and as a plus the intel CPU consumes a MUCH less power, pricewise the intel is CHEAPER since the intel is good with stock heatsink, and FX would need an aftermarket cooler to achieve this clock and get the i3-2100 performance.
My recommendation: if you want an AMD based rig, stick with the FX-4100 + aftermarket cooler, just know that it would likely be hot due to high OC and high power consumption.
If you want an Intel based rig, you can't beat the i3-2100 for the price. If you're VERY low in money go for Pentium G860, just check the benchmarks in the article I posted. (As a bonus you could upgrade later to a i5-2500k if needed)
------------------------------Core i7 2600k, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB Patriot DDR3, 2TB HD , SLI GTX 460 1GB, XFX 750W BE, 3D Vision, CM 690 II Advanced Reply to vitornob
only overclocking you're going to get is on the i5 2500k.
The i3-2100 will most likely beat out the AMD 'competition', not only that, there is an upgrade path from the i3 (to the i5-2500k) or ivybridge, whereas as AMD
it's Phenom-> FX, as the piledrive chip will be a different socket.
posted today, the i3-2100 basically batting all AMD offerings out of the park, where even the pentium (dual core, no hyper threading) performed on par with the expensive amd models.
From a gaming point of view, AMD have lost even after overclocking is taken into consideration.
Message edited by billybobser on 01-30-2012 at 01:55:22 PM
You don't know why he wanted to be able to OC. If you want to play the guessing game it may as well because it's a hobby.
I quote -
Quote :
I would like to play the newest games at Medium-High settings. I figure if I overclock I can save more money.
Unfortunatly Saving money by Overclocking with AMD Processors simply isnt possible in gaming - As a result I will still reccomend the i3 2100 - Its better value than an OC'd Phenom or FX
Newegg dropped their price on the i3 2100 by 15 bucks. I might as well go the non-overclocking route. I just checked http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 120-9.html and it says the i3 2100 beats all of AMD's CPU's in most benchmarks. So can I get a build with an i3 2100 and a MicroATX motherboard? I asked for a more compact case, too. I don't plan on Crossfiring/SLI anytime soon. And I won't upgrade to an i5/i7 anytime in the future.
Message edited by xpeh on 01-30-2012 at 04:59:40 PM
Yeah, I just got my little brother an i3-2120 and a Asus H61 mATX mobo. It works really well. He had a 5770 from his previous system and it now runs games on medium settings. You could probably afford a 6870 which will enable high settings on most games.
As per this review, Picking A Sub-$200 Gaming CPU: FX, An APU, Or A Pentium?, even the OCked FX-4100 @4.2Ghz isn't better than a i3-2100 for gaming. (even considering the 1080p where CPU would be a lesser factor), and as a plus the intel CPU consumes a MUCH less power, pricewise the intel is CHEAPER since the intel is good with stock heatsink, and FX would need an aftermarket cooler to achieve this clock and get the i3-2100 performance.
Benchmarks like these are a little misleading .
They pair a $580 graphics card with a $110 processor and a $120 mb . This is not a system anyone would build so you cant make valid comparisons of performance for a computer with a total budget of less than the cost of that graphics card alone .
FX 4100's hit 4.6 GHz on the stock cooler in a decent case with some air flow . No aftermarket cooler is required .
This page
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 120-8.html shows quite clearly where a processor like the FX 4100 will outshine the i3 2100 .
This is a graphically intensive game thats probably more like the games we will see released in the future. The FX scores 48 fps at stock speed , the i3 2100 scores 50 fps .
The i3 cant be overclocked . The FX can be OC'ed a massive 30% on the stock cooler
The FX will then comfortably beat the i3
If you only want to play older games then the i3 has advantages , but if you want to play newer games as they are released and you want upgradability then its FX all the way
Well currently, the i3-2100 and the FX-4100 are the same price on newegg. Although I'm kind of leaning toward AMD. If I would like to transcode a video, would an FX-4100 overclocked to 4.6GHz outshine an i3-2100?
Shows the quad i5 and FX 8150 having very similar performance . OCing the FX will scale performance perfectly . Clock it 30% higher it will encode 30% faster