Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Why is it that I can't get true readings from my Minolta Incident meter, and
transfer them to my Nikon 5700? If I use the incident reading with the
camera (yes, the ISO is the same on both) I get either underexposed, or
overexposed. Confused!
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"John" <jlinsk@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:ZxRje.4445$lQ3.2122@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> Why is it that I can't get true readings from my Minolta Incident meter,
> and transfer them to my Nikon 5700? If I use the incident reading with
> the camera (yes, the ISO is the same on both) I get either underexposed,
> or overexposed. Confused!
IMHO an incident meter is the equivalent of metering off a gray card
compromising for an average exposure. I use one all the time. So, a lot
depends on the image. The meter has no idea what you are photographing.
It's only averaging the light that falls on it. It doesn't know what color
it is, or whether it's mostly dark or light. The meter in the camera is
supposed to take all this into account, but is rarely dead on either,
leaving you to have to use your brain and experience where the meter leaves
off.
Also, when was the last time you had your hand-held meter calibrated?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
John wrote:
> Why is it that I can't get true readings from my Minolta Incident meter,
> and
> transfer them to my Nikon 5700? If I use the incident reading with the
> camera (yes, the ISO is the same on both) I get either underexposed, or
> overexposed. Confused!
Using a incident meter correctly takes some learning and evaluation of
what's being photographed. It's like metering off a grey card and you must
also use the meter in same light source as what is being photographed.
Outdoors this normally isn't a problem.
--
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.