The following post is highly speculative. I'm just trying to figure out what the best quad-core FX chip, AMD could bring out by year's end. The calculations below may not be all that technically sound. Reading this could possibly be a waste of your time. Peace
Given that a 3.6GHz FX 4100, which is actually a half disabled 8core chip, has a TDP of 95W, its highly likely that a native quad core module with only 6MB cache, if manufactured, would have a TDP of only around 80W.
Add in cyclos tech, and we could pull this down under 65W.
Now crank up the clock speed to accommodate a 125W budget (almost double the TDP), and a 4.9GHz/5GHz+ turbo quad core FX seems very much possible
Also, being a native 2 module, it would also be much cheaper to manufacture This unlocked chip could seriously put a huge dent in the ivy bridge core i3's, if priced around $145. 95W chips at 4.4GHz are also possible
What do you guys think??
Given that a 3.6GHz FX 4100, which is actually a half disabled 8core chip, has a TDP of 95W, its highly likely that a native quad core module with only 6MB cache, if manufactured, would have a TDP of only around 80W.
Add in cyclos tech, and we could pull this down under 65W.
Now crank up the clock speed to accommodate a 125W budget (almost double the TDP), and a 4.9GHz/5GHz+ turbo quad core FX seems very much possible
Also, being a native 2 module, it would also be much cheaper to manufacture This unlocked chip could seriously put a huge dent in the ivy bridge core i3's, if priced around $145. 95W chips at 4.4GHz are also possible
What do you guys think??