Can't decide between the Canon EOS 1DsMk11, the Nikon D2X,..

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Which one should I go for, I wonder?

Is there by any chance - although highly unlikely I know - amongst you a
wise and learned man, maybe someone who is intimately acquainted with all
things Sigma, a prophet not recognised in his own land, who might make up my
mind for me?

Carrigman

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Jeez, that was quick.

There I was doing a little fishing, not expecting a bite for some time
when... whoa! Preddy takes it hook, line and sinker!

Straught on to the bank. Whack! Whack! Whack!

Now, should I stuff it or eat it?

Carrigman




"George Preddy" <george.preddy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns965F929911239xxxxSIGMASD10xxxx@82.106.6.176...
> "carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in
> news6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net:
>
>> Which one should I go for, I wonder?
>
> Sigma SD10, hands down.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In rec.photo.digital carrigman <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote:
> Jeez, that was quick.
>
> There I was doing a little fishing, not expecting a bite for some time
> when... whoa! Preddy takes it hook, line and sinker!
>
> Straught on to the bank. Whack! Whack! Whack!
>
> Now, should I stuff it or eat it?
>
> Carrigman

LOL - apologies for calling you a Preddy sock earlier

pete
--
pete@fenelon.com "There's no room for enigmas in built-up areas" - HMHB

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

SD-10 : garbage

Nikon D2X: well the D2H's are all going back to Nikon for repair . . .

Canon 1Ds Mk II : Nice camera, but costs TOO DAMN MUCH

Quite happy with my Evolt, yea, I know, it has a few problems too . . .
maybe in ten years this technology will finally mature.

"George Preddy" <george.preddy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns965F929911239xxxxSIGMASD10xxxx@82.106.6.176...
> "carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in
> news6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net:
>
> > Which one should I go for, I wonder?
>
> Sigma SD10, hands down.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

George - you are getting sillier and sillier.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

"carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in message
news6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> Which one should I go for, I wonder?
>
> Is there by any chance - although highly unlikely I know - amongst you a
> wise and learned man, maybe someone who is intimately acquainted with all
> things Sigma, a prophet not recognised in his own land, who might make up
my
> mind for me?
>
> Carrigman
>
>

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in message
news6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> Which one should I go for, I wonder?
>
> Is there by any chance - although highly unlikely I know - amongst you a
> wise and learned man, maybe someone who is intimately acquainted with all
> things Sigma, a prophet not recognised in his own land, who might make up
> my mind for me?
>
> Carrigman

Hahahaha!!

Nice try, troll.

Your ONLY other post (not in this thread, and one of only 4 total posts to
this NG) said:

"Why don't you look at the indepth reviews and comparisons of these cameras
in www.dpreview.com and www.steves-digicams.com and make up your mind?

Carrigman "

Isn't it funny how you'd forget so quickly your own advice?
You're not fooling anyone...

What a joke...

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In article <d6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net>, carrigman
<carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote:

> Which one should I go for, I wonder?

Anything *but* Sigma.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Mark,

I'm afraid that you (and a few others) didn't get the joke. (As if anyone
could take the heading seriously).

I am NOT George Preddy under a different guise. The whole point of the post
was to ridicule him. Read my follow up email to his response and it will be
clear.

Regards,

Carrigman





"Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
news:Xlvke.43874$Qp.43136@fed1read04...
>
> "carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in message
> news6t69k$v1r$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
>> Which one should I go for, I wonder?
>>
>> Is there by any chance - although highly unlikely I know - amongst you
>> a wise and learned man, maybe someone who is intimately acquainted with
>> all things Sigma, a prophet not recognised in his own land, who might
>> make up my mind for me?
>>
>> Carrigman
>
> Hahahaha!!
>
> Nice try, troll.
>
> Your ONLY other post (not in this thread, and one of only 4 total posts to
> this NG) said:
>
> "Why don't you look at the indepth reviews and comparisons of these
> cameras
> in www.dpreview.com and www.steves-digicams.com and make up your mind?
>
> Carrigman "
>
> Isn't it funny how you'd forget so quickly your own advice?
> You're not fooling anyone...
>
> What a joke...
>
>
>

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
news:GoOke.2195$yp.709@fed1read02...
SNIP
> Ya, I realized it later and noted it elsewhere in this thread...
> Sadly, your post wasn't too different from the sock puppet trolls
> George likes to spew.
>
> I was hoping the person who posts as George Preddy would have
> evapoarated by now, but no such luck.

It only demonstrates that a concept like "Weapons of Mass Destruction"
can fail ;-).

Bart

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

George since you are only pathetic little troll and don't even own a
camera, let alone know how to operate one, and since you are hyping the
worst POS on the market, no real human is ever going to thank you for
anything other than going back on your meds.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

"George Preddy" <george.preddy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9661EBAF2CE47xxxxSIGMASD10xxxx@82.106.6.176...
> "Tony" <tspadaro@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> newsMtke.39208$tf1.4621562@twister.southeast.rr.com:
>
> > George - you are getting sillier and sillier.
>
> That wasn't me. I suppose you have everyone else in this thread
> killfiled or you would have known that, slick. BTW, I'm not that nice
> lady Sarah Margaret or whatever her name is, either.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

<george_preddy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117260552.684794.172790@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> carrigman wrote:
>> Jeez, that was quick.
>>
>> There I was doing a little fishing, not expecting a bite for some time
>> when... whoa! Preddy takes it hook, line and sinker!
>
> Steven Sharf is the "George Preddy" that uses Sharf's @gmail address.
>
> 'fraid you caught a boot.
>
Nice try...
One of my employees uses an @gmail address, does that mean he's George
Preddy, too?

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Tony wrote:
> George since you are only pathetic little troll and don't even own a
> camera,

Which Geaorge Preddy are you?

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Tony wrote:
> George since you are only pathetic little troll and don't even own a
> camera,

Which Geaorge Preddy are you?