Hi Guys and Girls, a big thanks up front to everybody who contributes, just in case I don't get the chance later on...
I've already done a fair bit of reading around and found mostly outdated posts and hijacked threads, making it a really hard to get my head around piecing together a robust, future proof and above all current system (Allowing for any new groundbreaking releases?!). So for me and any other beginners out there i'm looking to start again and grow the thread organically to try and get all of the pieces to fall in to place, also i'm looking to learn a thing or two at the feet of those in the know...
The system I'm aiming for is approx. < 4Ghz w/t minimal OC and system tweaks. And will be used for multiple phone application emulation as well as 2D and 3D graphics testing. I'm aiming on keeping this system for 3-5 years but don't want to break the bank building it, however, budget is somewhat flexible.
Starting at the beginning, with the CPU... You might have guessed but I've plumed for the Phenom II x4, but that's as far as I've got in that decision. There have been many people with their piece to say and no definitive answers to some very interesting points raised:
I'm aware of the potential of the 955 BE and the multiplier adjustment (x16 --> x18) to achieve the similar speeds as a 970, but I had come across a thread in regard AMD testing for stability resulting in classifications of 955 and 965/975 etc., with the 965BE offering slightly improved stability even though they're exactly the same core with different factory release multipliers.
Specifically I'm looking at the: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Deneb 3.2GHz Socket AM3 125W Quad-Core Processor Model HDZ955FBGMBOX/125W C3 steeping
Does this have any merit at increased voltage with an increase to the multiplier? There is only a slight difference in price and that would be well worth the increased stability in my book, or is this simply falling prey to the marketing of AMD?
Or is this processor slightly short of the mark these days? It seems to be favored over the FX 4100 and I've proven that to myself through research, but is there anything to be said for Bulldozer atm?
Thanks again guys, and for people who are nice enough to post, can I please ask that it's kept within the realms of processors , for the time being I'd like to Grow the post, just so I can keep up if nothing else..
I've already done a fair bit of reading around and found mostly outdated posts and hijacked threads, making it a really hard to get my head around piecing together a robust, future proof and above all current system (Allowing for any new groundbreaking releases?!). So for me and any other beginners out there i'm looking to start again and grow the thread organically to try and get all of the pieces to fall in to place, also i'm looking to learn a thing or two at the feet of those in the know...
The system I'm aiming for is approx. < 4Ghz w/t minimal OC and system tweaks. And will be used for multiple phone application emulation as well as 2D and 3D graphics testing. I'm aiming on keeping this system for 3-5 years but don't want to break the bank building it, however, budget is somewhat flexible.
Starting at the beginning, with the CPU... You might have guessed but I've plumed for the Phenom II x4, but that's as far as I've got in that decision. There have been many people with their piece to say and no definitive answers to some very interesting points raised:
I'm aware of the potential of the 955 BE and the multiplier adjustment (x16 --> x18) to achieve the similar speeds as a 970, but I had come across a thread in regard AMD testing for stability resulting in classifications of 955 and 965/975 etc., with the 965BE offering slightly improved stability even though they're exactly the same core with different factory release multipliers.
Specifically I'm looking at the: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Deneb 3.2GHz Socket AM3 125W Quad-Core Processor Model HDZ955FBGMBOX/125W C3 steeping
Does this have any merit at increased voltage with an increase to the multiplier? There is only a slight difference in price and that would be well worth the increased stability in my book, or is this simply falling prey to the marketing of AMD?
Or is this processor slightly short of the mark these days? It seems to be favored over the FX 4100 and I've proven that to myself through research, but is there anything to be said for Bulldozer atm?
Thanks again guys, and for people who are nice enough to post, can I please ask that it's kept within the realms of processors , for the time being I'd like to Grow the post, just so I can keep up if nothing else..