Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > For the money, which would you reach for?

For the money, which would you reach for?

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - For the money, which would you reach for?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences. FWIW,
I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints into a
gallery or two around town.

Regards,

Ben

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

kombi45@yahoo.com writes:
> The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
> 8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
> purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences. FWIW,
> I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints into a
> gallery or two around town.

Between those two choices I'd definitely go for the D70. You will get
much cleaner prints from the large sensor.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Paul Rubin wrote:
> kombi45@yahoo.com writes:
> > The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
> > 8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
> > purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences. FWIW,
> > I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints into a
> > gallery or two around town.
>
> Between those two choices I'd definitely go for the D70. You will get
> much cleaner prints from the large sensor.

That seems to be the word - the Coolpix is a bit of a...gilded turd, if
you will. The much lower priced D70 gets killer reviews at B&H while
the 8800 leaves alot to be desired from a user review standpoint.
Common themes are that it is bad in low light, trouble with manual
focus, etc.

Seems like the B&H kit doesn't tell you what lens it comes with. Looks
like the "off the rack" lens is a 18-70mm Nikkor. This is my only
reservation with this camera - The 8800 rolls from 18-350, I believe.
What's the fix for this minor snafu?

Ben

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

kombi45@yahoo.com writes:
> Seems like the B&H kit doesn't tell you what lens it comes with. Looks
> like the "off the rack" lens is a 18-70mm Nikkor. This is my only
> reservation with this camera - The 8800 rolls from 18-350, I believe.
> What's the fix for this minor snafu?

The 8800 has the equivalent of a 35-350 in 35mm terms. The D70 kit
lens is more like a 28-105. You can add a 70-210 to the D70 which
would give you the same telephoto coverage as the 8800.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

In terms of image quality the difference between the two D70 and the 8800 is
vastly over-rated. The Sony imaging sensor in the 8800 is maligned by
everyone except people who have actually used these cameras extensively and
have had the opportunity to compare their images with the D70: the D70 is
not the hands down winner for resolution or color fidelity or low noise and
other distortions.
The fixed lens of the 8800 is more than good enough for most uses, although
the wide angle end is somewhat limited (equivalent to 35mm lens on a 35mm
camera).
The interchangeable lenses of a dSLR is technically a superior option but
may be not so superior in practical terms depending on what you are looking
for.
Since I use both types of cameras regularly I can assure you the dSLR form
factor is much easier and faster to handle than the electronic viewfinder
8800. In truth viewing in bright daylight with an EVF can be very difficult.
Still I like these cameras for what they are: good all in one solutions for
many advanced users.
On the other hand the 8800 is much lighter to carry around and may be more
usable for you in particular. Usability can be a more important
consideration than other technical issues.
The D70 also has a wealth of sophisticated control options which also
distinguishes it from the 8800--if you want to learn to use all the options.
Doubtless future Nikon dSLRs will have higher megapixel counts, increased
latitude and lower noise but they have done a really good job with the
control set built into the D70.

Reply to birdman

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

kombi45@yahoo.com wrote:
> The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
> 8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
> purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences. FWIW,
> I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints into a
> gallery or two around town.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ben
>
Hi,
Comparing apple to orange; not good. Why Nikon?
You don't like Canon?
I have D70, Panasonic FZ20, Oly C5060, Digital Rebel.
They all have their use for different situations.
The one I use most is Oly.
Tony

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

<kombi45@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117147056.524147.9810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
> 8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
> purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences. FWIW,
> I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints into a
> gallery or two around town.
There are no "obvious answers" in photography. Which one you select depends
on how you intend to use it.
The 8800 has a smaller and hence noisier CCD (or whatever they are using).
The 8800 is rather limited in the wide angle end unless you spend even more
money on an adapter.
On the other hand, the D70 preserves my investment in lenses.
Jim
>
> Regards,
>
> Ben
>

Reply to Jim

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Tony Hwang wrote:

> Hi,
> Comparing apple to orange; not good.

Well, of the Nikons I looked at, these two jumped out at me. I'm not
really comparing so much as asking which people around here prefer.

>Why Nikon?
> You don't like Canon?

To be perfectly honest, I haven't really looked at Canon. I've always
used Nikon SLRs...weak answer, but I guess I'm a slave to marketing.

> I have D70, Panasonic FZ20, Oly C5060, Digital Rebel.
> They all have their use for different situations.
> The one I use most is Oly.

Tell me more....

Ben

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Paul Rubin wrote:
> kombi45@yahoo.com writes:
>> Seems like the B&H kit doesn't tell you what lens it comes with.
>> Looks like the "off the rack" lens is a 18-70mm Nikkor. This is my
>> only reservation with this camera - The 8800 rolls from 18-350, I
>> believe. What's the fix for this minor snafu?
>
> The 8800 has the equivalent of a 35-350 in 35mm terms. The D70 kit
> lens is more like a 28-105. You can add a 70-210 to the D70 which
> would give you the same telephoto coverage as the 8800.

Except that the 8800 includes image stabilisation, which vastly increases
the usability of its 350mm maximum.

David

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

kombi45@yahoo.com wrote:
> The Nikon D70 or the Nikon Coolpix 8800? The obvious answer is the
> 8800, but being a relative newbie to the digi world with the budget to
> purchase either two, I am curious for some feedback/experiences.
> FWIW, I am an amateur 35mm user with eyes on getting some digi prints
> into a gallery or two around town.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ben

I "reached for" a Nikon Coolpix 8400 with it 24mm wide-angle zoom lens.
For indoors use architectural photography, it's great. I supplemented
this with a Panasonic FZ5 which has an image stabilised 432mm/f3.3 maximum
zoom lens. Whilst DLSRs will give you a better image, you may not be able
to see the difference (depending on how you display the images), they are
much heavier and much more expensive. They are also prone to dust. You
may need to decide if the extra quality is sufficient to justify the extra
pain (unless the kit lens does all you want).

David

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"David J Taylor" <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> writes:
> > The 8800 has the equivalent of a 35-350 in 35mm terms. The D70 kit
> > lens is more like a 28-105. You can add a 70-210 to the D70 which
> > would give you the same telephoto coverage as the 8800.
>
> Except that the 8800 includes image stabilisation, which vastly increases
> the usability of its 350mm maximum.

Yes. There is a 70-200 VR which is fast, but very big and expensive.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > For the money, which would you reach for?
Go to:

There are 1143 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them