Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > bush is snorting cocaine again

bush is snorting cocaine again

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - bush is snorting cocaine again

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

bush must be snorting cocaine again with his latest idea to have a permanent colony on the moon and send people to mars. granted space travel i think is a fantasy that many of us hold. i know when i was a kid the idea of traveling to the moon seemed so futuristic and fantasic.

an article from the washington post sums it up best

Quote :


BILL CLINTON used to be mocked as the first baby boomer president. He was so undisciplined, the critics used to sneer: He thought life's normal constraints and rules did not apply to him, and he lacked the seriousness to impose priorities on his laundry lists of initiatives. President Bush has escaped this critique, at least for the most part: His frame is trim; his hair is trimmed; he seems the very embodiment of discipline. But now this escape must surely end. A human settlement on the moon? A manned flight to Mars? If Mr. Bush really does embrace those objectives next Wednesday, as his staff suggests he will, it will be fair to ask: Does he not believe that life's normal constraints and rules apply to him? Does he lack the seriousness to decide priorities?

Actually, Mr. Bush's contempt for the constraints of fiscal prudence has been evident for a long while. Some presidents before him -- Mr. Clinton included -- made hard choices among competing spending programs, and between spending and taxes. Mr. Bush spends money freely in all directions and cuts taxes as well. Now he wants to colonize the moon and eventually send Americans to Mars! The last time this idea was floated -- by the president's father, in 1989 -- NASA put the likely cost at $400 billion.

We are not against presidents who pursue big ideas, even expensive ones. We can think of several worthy candidates, as we have said before: Make sure that every child who qualifies for Head Start is actually covered by the program; extend housing assistance to the 5 million American families who qualify for it but nonetheless are excluded; and provide preschooling and health insurance for all the nation's 4-year-olds. Mr. Bush himself boasts several bold and, in our view, crucial initiatives that require his continuing attention if they are to succeed: He has launched a multifaceted assault on terrorism, embarked on nation-building ventures in Afghanistan and Iraq, and promised to greatly expand America's efforts against the AIDS virus.

Mr. Bush's AIDS initiative could stem the tide of a plague that is set to kill more people than World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War combined. It's not clear, by contrast, what practical results, if any, would be yielded by Mr. Bush's moon-Mars agenda. A more modest evolution in spaceflight technology -- officials Friday were talking about a 5 percent increase in NASA's budget -- would be worth debating in ordinary times. But Mr. Bush's past fiscal recklessness puts a heavy burden even on modest proposals -- and flying to the moon is not modest.

The success of NASA's latest Mars venture has proved the worth of unmanned missions, while manned space flight is exorbitantly expensive. After President George H.W. Bush proposed a return to the moon as a way station for Mars, sticker shock soon ended the moon talk, and no doubt the same may happen again. In which case the current President Bush will have floated an unserious proposal, succeeding merely in sounding big and capturing newspaper headlines.




someone must pust a stop to delusions of granduer that this man has. you cannot cut taxes, spend hundreds of billions of dollars rebuilding iraq, spend my guess would be a couple of trillion dollars because you know the costs will never be what they say in terms of government take origigan estimates and multiply by ten at least.

surely there are more important thins going on in this country that need care before we attempt to send someone to mars and waste trillions of dollars in doing so. this by the way is a method of distraction that governments use to draw attention away from themselves.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

No offense, but I think you're wrong here. You're just being political and refusing to look at this beyond the politics. I'm not even going to argue about this since this is really an individual opinion issue, but I think it's important to recognize what the space program has done for mankind. Everything from CCD cameras, the foam in your bed, cordless power tools, smoke detectors, home insulation, LEDs, digital mamography, jaws of life, and about 10000000 other things are because of NASA and the space program.

Don't discount any of these expendatures before analyzing the returns. What NASA has done for this world is beyond the pretty pictures.

The technology that will be developed because of this will be extraordinary, usefull, and definitely worth it to say the least.

So far it's just words though. I'd like to see him rise above the politics and actually make it so.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

I would personally like to see an accelerated space program, and this is one thing I would somewhat actually commend Bush on if he goes through with it.

But, I just don't see how it's possible. The massive tax cuts and accelerated spending in many other facets of government, as well as the bloating fiscal defecit just don't really allow for any more money into the space program at this time.

All I want to do is go into space before I die. That'd be sweet. :P

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth

i would really love to see space travel become a reality and eventually it will. can we afford to fund such a program when we are already spending hundreds of billions of dollars fighting the "war on terror" add to the massive tax cuts which reduces the amount of money the federal government already doesn't have.

you cannot cut taxes, give the military a blank check, give nasa a blank check, and then still expect to have any money left over to actually run the country. where will he get the money to fund this? is space travel really something that we want only one country controlling?

here is a question though, why haven't we gone back to the moon?

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

Hey those underpant gnomes are advising bush. Who the hell are you to question them?!!

<b><font color=red>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."</font color=red><font color=blue> - Benjamin Franklin</font color=blue></b>

Reply to HolyGrenade

someone who isn't brainwashed by all the patriotic propaganda this administration uses to silence their critics.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

Yeah but they're the underpant gnomes, they're never wrong!


<b><font color=red>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."</font color=red><font color=blue> - Benjamin Franklin</font color=blue></b>

Reply to HolyGrenade

Quote :

here is a question though, why haven't we gone back to the moon?



Even if we wanted to we couldn't right now. All the equipment that we had for that mission has been retired, is in museums, doesn't work, etc. We would have to redevelop it.

That's what they told me in college at least.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

why would we go back to the moon? theres not a lot there. what, were supposed to go back and say, yea, this is about what it looked like. lets get some samples of dirt, wich we already have and go home.

wpdclan.com cs game server - 69.12.5.119:27015

Reply to jihiggs

Maybe we can mine stuff up there? Perhaps even telescopes on the far side, big ones too. A base might be very useful for trips to Mars.

-----
Hope for the future.
Reflect on the past.
But focus on the present you mofo.

Reply to Woodman

Why do any science that doesn't provide instant gratification? Should we just sit on earth and not even bother moving beyond it? Why do we have the space station? It's all about scientific experimentation and moving beyond our stagnant borders.

If you want a real world application, then consider that without the technology to move beyond Earth, we would have to watch our own extinction unfold if a comet or meteor was headed towards us. You could fire all the nuclear weapons you want at it but in the end you're just gonna get hit by the same rock, just in a couple different pieces, if you even hit it.

You would have to get very lucky to spot something far enough out to be able to divert it's path. Something 1 km wide could wipe us all out and it's pretty much invisibile until it's too late.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Ever watch West Wing? I know its jsut a TV show but it has some nice insights from time to time. There was an episode where a physicist wanted to fund a superconducting supercollider. They asked him what practical application it had...his response..."nothing". Then he went on to say that when the electron was discovered, it had no practical application either...or the theory of gravity, he went on to list a host of other things that became significant only after the fact. The point was that sometimes discovery and exploration is its own reward, and damn the consequences. Besides if our reach doesn't exceed our grasp, where is the nobility of man?

If an argument can't be settled in one or two paragraphs, perhaps your just anal and should let it go...

Reply to Grub

i understand the point of exploration and discovery and am all for technological advances, but how can we pay for this, better yet who is going to pay for it?

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

Flamey says he can pay for it by working 2 weeks a year.

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

If he busts his ass and works another 2 weeks with overtime, we could go to Jupiter to.

<font color=blue>"Look, I know it's old-fashioned, but I'm from the school that believes if God intended us to fly, he wouldn't have invented Spanish air traffic control" - Dave Lister</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

We can easily pay for this. I think we should tax the poor and middle class an extra 10%. That'll do it.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Space travel is our future. Anyone who doubts that is a very close minded person. It will be many years, maybe decades before a human sets foot on Mars, but we will do it. Yes it will cost a whole sh!t load to do it. But if we can get all these inbred 3rd world countries to get their head out of their arse, wake up and realize that its the 21st century we can put the defense money into actually doing something good for humans instead of killing.
Star Trek is science fiction, most of it is, but it is our future.

Reply to sturm

youre whole life must revolove around trying to bust the sh|t out of Bush. Everyone in here knows you dont like him and everyone in here knows youre a red-diaper doper communist bastard. Im tired of your whining personally and i do believe some others in here feel the same way. get a grip dude we all know you hate Bush man just leave it at that instead of giving us a weekly update on how much you think Bush is an idiot or how much you think Bush has phukked up or how much you think Bush should be replaced. We understand.... let it go.

<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface

I fully support the space program, if for nothing more than the developments they make that end up as consumer products. We do need to go to space eventally, and i figure sooner rather than later is the way to go. What I think bush is snorting cocaine on is his economics. At least, I can't understand it. As someone already pointed out, you can't cut taxes and raise spending at the same time and expect happy things.

Reply to bandikoot

Not to scare anyone, but here are some interesting figures:

Quote :

It is estimated that the entire arsenal of nuclear weapons in the world during the height of the cold war in the 1960's was equivalent to 30,000 megatons of TNT



Quote :

According to David Morrison (NASA Ames Research Center) the usual figure for the kinetic energy from the Cretaceous/Tertiary impact of 65 millions years ago is 100 million megatons.



The extinction of the dinosaurs was not even the largest mass extinction. That asteroid was less than 8 miles wide most likely. If a asteroid of that size hits water (most of the earth is covered in water), it will generate a wave about a mile high. When the wave reaches land it can grow to several miles in height and can travel hundreds of miles inland. This will most likely wipe out most of the worlds population alone. Add in Earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions, lava flows, mass fires, EMP, etc and life as we know it is over. Hopefully the asteroid won't be too big since it might puncture the Earth's crust and that could leave us with Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions that last years. If you have something the size of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs, basically every person within 1,200 miles of the impact will die from the blast wave.

Say one hits in the Gulf of Mexico, every window in North America will practically be blown out, most buildings will colapse, a tsunami would drown a few hundred million people, and the blast would kill more people than have died in all the wars on earth. Land one in the mediteranean or baltic sea and Europe disapears. Land one in the Sea of Japan, or land one in the middle of the Atlantic and you can barely imagine the look of the people in New York and Amsterdam when the wave hits them.

Oh, and it's not a matter of "if", it's a matter of when.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Quote :

youre whole life must revolove around trying to bust the sh|t out of Bush. Everyone in here knows you dont like him and everyone in here knows youre a red-diaper doper communist bastard. Im tired of your whining personally and i do believe some others in here feel the same way. get a grip dude we all know you hate Bush man just leave it at that instead of giving us a weekly update on how much you think Bush is an idiot or how much you think Bush has phukked up or how much you think Bush should be replaced. We understand.... let it go.



i cannot and will not ever let this go. you understand the damage this administration has done, is doing and will continue to do will haunt the american people for decades to come. they will not be around to pick up the check when in comes due and i guarantee you that it will come due sooner rather than later.

you see i am doing what the media should be doing. since they are only presenting one side i present the other. you are free to choose to believe what you want, i simply supply the information.

i don't think bush is an idiot, he is an idiot, he has proved that notion time and time again without my help. i am here to remind people that this moron currently holds one of the more powerful positions in the world us president.

i am not a communist, just someone with open eyes who sees things in a different manner than most. i see things and see them for what they are, not necesarily what they are presented for. in the end each person draws out what they want to believe or see.

i can tell that you are quite irritated by my constant updates of this administration and their continued fups so that must really hit a nerve.

if you believe in democracy then you would realize that bush and his legion on minions have violated every tenet of what democracy stands for. that is the irony in this situation. all of you lapdogs don't even understand that you have been sh!te upon. the blind leading the blind i dare say.

ignorance and arrogance always go hand in hand. the only truth you find at the top of the mountain is the truth you brought with you. i know enough to know i truly know nothing at all.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by jmycal on 01/13/04 02:20 AM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to jmycal

you are free to post whatever crap you want but when u say your posting the truth about stuff and then begin to slander(or libel iguess since it is written) someone, then it is wrong for you to post it.

your exact saying is

Quote :


bush is snorting cocaine again


where is your proof please show me some. Then I will actually start to believe .001% of the crap you post here.

by calling me a lapdog, maybe youre right maybe i have faith in something you dont but who cares about that. You only see what you want to see its not that you see it different than everyone else my friend you just see it thru red-tinted glasses.

i also like how you try to make yourself out to be a very understanding man at the end of your post by saying the cute lil quote there but you are not understanding at and you truly beleive uyou know it all about this subject.
well i disagree with you there bud, i disagree.





<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface

Quote :

you see i am doing what the media should be doing. since they are only presenting one side i present the other. you are free to choose to believe what you want, i simply supply the information.


Jmycal, with all due respect, that doesn't make much sense. Only portraying one side? HUH?!?! Then where do you get all these articles you regularly quote on here? The fact that you routinely post so many on here from various news sources that agree WITH your side only speaks to the contrary.

Although, we do appreciate your frequent updates of our political situation (with made-up stories of drug use included) on Tom's <i>Hardware Guide</i> Community, a site that speaks to a very specific, small-percentage-of-the-population audience, of which roughly half are citizens of other countries and/or below our voting age.

(PS, not questioning the "free to choose to believe what you want" part of the quote. That part I wouldn't debate. Just copied the whole paragraph.)

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

Just as a point, generally I'm totally against bush, I think he's a sideways wanking fsck, but I do happen to think that one of the number one priorities on planet earth should be to GET THE [-peep-] OFF planet earth and colonize other planets/moons in some self sustaining manor regardless of cost. So long as humans remain confined on a single planet we're playing a cosmic game of russian roulette. I'd love to see a moon colony and launch point, then a similar thing on mars and perhaps something out on one of the moons in the outter planets and eventually something entirely outside our solar system just to be on the safe side. Preservation of the human race in the long run is considerably more important than 'head start' or rebuilding iraq/afg in my opinion. If he actually got long term programs enacted for the exploration/colonization of space it might be one of the very few things he's done I actually agree with and support. Anywho just my couple cents.

<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/shadus.html" target="_new">Shadus</A>

Reply to shadus

The only reason Bush is presenting the idea that we should all go to the moon is because the U.S understands that it's time is very limited. Take what Bush says lightly he does not talk for himself in any capacity, he is told what to say by a board of directors and that is what he asks for or says is. The man himself is not the one making any judgment calls for the entire population of a country. Dont kid your self on that count.

I was around to actually watch the moon landings and remember what was shown on T.V at that time. Whether any of it was real or not is secondary to the real fact that the U.S and countries with the same economic ideas as the U.S like Canada, England and France are running around like chickens with their collective heads cut-off behind closed doors.

The reasons are still the same as we as children were taught in school in the 70's and 80's by our History teachers and science teachers.

We as a human race on earth are running out of the resources we have used over the last one hundred years to advance science and our daily lives. Without the Fossil fuels that we have totally become dependant on we are on the edge of collapse.

These fossil fuels are only found on planet earth because of the past presence of the dinosaurs and decay and recycle only found in our known universe here on planet earth.

Going to the moon is not going to replenish fossil fuels it is not going to provide a launch platform so that we can trap asteroids and use the resources from them either.

The only reason they would like to make the moon a self supporting living environment without the use of fossil fuels is so that mankind has a place to crash after we burn out our planet.

The threat of losing what we have left is the driving force to find a new home where man can survive as the world leaders understand the type of warfare that will fall on all our heads over the last few drops of crude oil.

This planet will be drained of natural resources and it will be drained of the ability to support life of any kind after the wars that will come to control the last of what is available.

Having a life boat like the moon that can support and maintained the species is the only viable option the futurists have left open to them.

We as children in the 70's were already being told by scientists that the natural resources of our planet would be totally used-up in our own life times perhaps as little as 50 years. All these statements and previews of disaster seem to have been lost over the last few years we do not hear it spoken by teachers or scientists as it once was. Almost like they have been told to shut-up and ignore common sense.

I still talk to my grade 5 teacher a Mr. Thorsil and he has even spoken of this to me almost 30 years after the fact. His father was also a scientists and invented a tool used in open heart surgery to staple artery's closed without damaging them and another project he was supposed to have worked on was the antenna array used on the Voyager space craft.

I am always personally amazed that in the area of Canada I live in there is so many scientific endeavours and companies and Government programs as well as the famous people that worked in them or for them in this area. It is the Ottawa Capitol area in Ontario Canada but just growing up here has meant that going to school or participating in scientific events is almost an every day thing around here. It Gives a person a first hand insight into the sciences and the Government core around them.

Barton 3200+ 400MHz
A7N8X Deluxe
Liquid
2x512 Crucial DDR 400 PC3200
GeForce FX5900
Maxtor DiamondMaxPlus9@80Gig
SONY CD 52x
SONY RW 52x/24x/52x
SONY DVD 16x/40x

Reply to SoDNighthawk

I think he is referring to the mass media (ie, television news), and his statement about cocaine was meant to be a joke. Like when you say to someone "what the hell have you been smokin'?"

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth

Yeah, sources like the Washington Post and Reuters are nowhere near those categories....

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

Wow, that's the biggest load of utter sh!t i've ever seen anyone post.

Congrats!

Edit: No, wait! I did read a few chick tracts once... those were a larger load of [-peep-], but this is pretty close. Ever consider a career in religious cartooning when you get outta high school?

<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/shadus.html" target="_new">Shadus</A><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by shadus on 01/13/04 12:30 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to shadus

While that may or may not be true, as it is based on opinion, it was much more constructive than

Quote :

Wow, that's the biggest load of utter sh!t i've ever seen anyone post.

Congrats!


He did put some thought into his reply. If you agree or disagree, at least it was well written and not flaming.

:mad: I HATE NET NAZIS!!! :mad:

Reply to JustPlainJef

Sorry, I just generally carry my dislike for him no matter where he posts around. After seeing the utter bs he feeds the newbs in cpu/graphics intended to utterly fsck them up, I'm not real nice. I wouldn't say he put alot of thought into it, more like alot of paranoia.

<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/shadus.html" target="_new">Shadus</A>

Reply to shadus

ksoth said it below as what the f@#k is bush snorting.

i only believe what i believe but i don't really know anything. we will never know the reasons behind the invasion of iraq, only what we choose to accept and believe as reason.

too many people have blinders on with respect to this administration to see that what they have actually been doing is less then "holy"

you are also in the military and i have not met one single military person who has anything bad to say about this administration. further all of the military people that i have met or know since this began fully support what we are doing, essencially going on blind faith with what this administration is doing.

blind faith will betray you in the end. i am foolish enough to think that something might change as a result of all of this, but smart enough to know that may never happen.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

what i'll pose to you auburn is that if the media had done a decent job, why are so many americans still convinced that sadaam had a direct link to 911? both sides of the story are being told but the bush side is the one that is getting all the focus. instead of journalism lapping up every word this administration says at face value, what ever happend to critiquing what has been said.

since more americans get their news from fox we have a problem with "fair and balanced" news reporting.

although i do admit the average thg reader is probably a little more informed than the average citizen.

it is providing some form of balance in the world.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

You sir, are a moron. Do you have any clue about anything that pours out of the hole in your face?

What you just posted was just complete garbage.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

If you assume the average thg reader is a bit more informed (and I would go as far as to say the average person on the net is more informed) then they have already made judgements one way or the other on the information they have been exposed to and as such you are preaching to the choir even if they don't agree with you in some cases they're still making informed choices. So why do it since it generally degenerates into a flamewar?

<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/shadus.html" target="_new">Shadus</A>

Reply to shadus

ymcal, can I ask you a question? Do you discuss this stuff in person? The reason I ask is because I was driving home from work last night and I came across some news talk radio (I have no idea who the talk show host was), and this lady called in and did a rant that pretty much covered a lot of what you say.

She sounded insane. Written it's at least presentable and we can discuss and debate this stuff, but orally it sounds absolutely insane. She sounded like a complete nutcase.

I think that anytime you present an argument from only one side, in order to try to balance this invisible other side, you come across as an extremest. Whether it be moveon.org or you, it just comes across as irrational.

Try to balance out your views. Presenting Bush as the anti-christ just doesn't appeal to anyone other than the far left. You're way too sharp too be presenting only one side.

O'neal is presenting one side and he comes across as irrational. Like the guy who did the same thing to Reagan, O'neal will disapear very soon from the spotlight. You can't just say extremest things that can be debunked in 2 seconds or have no proof and think you're right. O'neal discredits himself from the get go when he starts talking about Bush planning for Iraq before 911, since that is exactly what Bush should have been doing. Nothing changed after 911 other than our priorites. It was Clinton that set the regime change policy in motion but at the time the priority wasn't getting Saddam, it was staying in office and making a name for himself in the mideast peace process. With global terrorism attacking country after country though Saddam was first on the list to go after the gulf war and 12 years of non-compliance with the world community. The common person will look at events as they unfold and think it makes sense. The extremests will propose conspiracy theories and will come across as irrational.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Can't really speak for either side getting more focus; coverage I myself have seen seems fairly even, maybe even more on the no-911-connection side. I know I hear more conversations of the no-911-connection side, but maybe that's just from folks I'm around. Haven't tried to find any polls on it.

What I pose to you in turn is, is this your main outlet for "doing what the media should be doing" (or maybe is doing)? Obviously, I have no idea what you do outside of here, but you've spent quite of bit of time on here making many large posts about this kind of thing. How many regulars of Other are there? Maybe 100? (haven't really added us all up) How many of those will be of voting age and ability this year? (i.e. not 16 or non-US) With all the flames, name-calling, people telling each other to go kill themselves, etc on here, changing opinions here seems pretty difficult. And if average thg readers <i>are</i> already more informed than average citizens (as you said), wouldn't efforts be better spent elsewhere?

Just seems like, if you <i>are</i> going to do the job you say the media isn't doing, you'd find a better outlet for what seems like such sizeable chunk of your time.


<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

How do you know that most people think that Saddam is linked to 911? How do you know that most people get their news from fox?

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Ahh, just got to see that after I submitted my last one. Meant to mention the extremist part. Gotta agree, that part doesn't help, either.

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

I see Canada can now bid on Iraq contracts. That's good. I felt we were too hard on them.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Oneal is backtracking and apologizing for comments in his book now.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>ElectroDwarf loves Americans!</b></font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

I myself doubt that Saddam was directly linked to 9/11, but he was a sponsor of terrorism worldwide, and al-Qaeda used Iraq, amongst other countries, to move money around using the banking system of hawalla.

When I served in Northern Ireland, my regiment was used by a joint military/intelligence services organisation known within the forces as the Det (or Detachment). They used all sorts of tricks and methods to destabilise and defeat PIRA. Weapons shipments were tracked from source of purchase to their inevitable involvement in a hit on troops and then when they tried to recover them from a cache in the countryside. One such recovery, involving men from my regiment, found a batch of AK's that had been tracked by MI6, and had been shipped from Iraq. PIRA bought weapons from all over the world, and had very good relations with some middle east countries that had a certain dislike for the west. Saddam is guilty of sponsoring terrorism the world over.

<font color=blue>"Look, I know it's old-fashioned, but I'm from the school that believes if God intended us to fly, he wouldn't have invented Spanish air traffic control" - Dave Lister</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

there have been polls to indicate that something like 75% of people believe that sadaam had a direct link between 911 and iraq. although the white house has since come out and said that there never was a direct link so the number may have dropped. but for a longtime many thought saddam had a direct link with 911.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

just want to discuss issues and viewpoints with people. it is what i enjoy doing. nothing is more fun than arguing sometimes

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

i discuss this stuff with my friends, some agree some don't.

what i like to do is present stuff and then debate people bringing out both sides to a viewpoint.

i suppose i should play devils advocate and present the opposing side as well as mine.

i am strong willed and passionate about what i believe in, maybe more so than other people so i may sound extremist.



<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

probably is a mute point trying to convert people who are stedfast in their beliefs, but it is invigorating mentally to argue with people, gets you thinking.

i talk to my coworkers, friends about the same thing, but here is a chance if nothing more to vent frustrations i have with/this administration. occaasionaly i write letters to the local newspaper on various things i have problems with, some have gotten printed some don't

all in all i should focus on other things like finding a girlfriend and someone to be with than spouting off about bush, instead of getting bush (bad one i know)



<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

i have no doubt that saddam did bad things and is probably a good thing that he is gone. i have only questioned the manner in which the us proceeded to do this.

pira is that the ira? did you see the movie bloody sunday came out about a year and a half ago? damn realistic movie shot documentary style to create a greater effect on the movie goer. interesting to hear you thoughts if you ad seen it, i thought it was very well done and from what i understand historically accurate as well. don't know a whole lot about the ira and brittain except it has been a violent history.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

Would help, especially if ya focus on what's below the bush, or the bare plot, whichever it may be.



<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698

it was the same way they got rid of hitler to man.
or am i wrong?


<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface

Saddam was the president of a little piece of shít worthless country(I know it's his fault.) A comparison with one of the most powerfull men in history is out of place. Hitler had a real chance of taking over the world and his intentions on that point were clear.

<b> A mosquito is just a small woodpecker. </b>

Reply to Snorkius

so it matters that hitler killed 6million(?) ppl and saddam only killed his few tens of thousands???

wow thats suprising.

<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > bush is snorting cocaine again
Go to:

There are 586 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them