Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I am on the verge of buying this model. I have read a number of
reviews and reports but I would like to hear from users of this
camera. On the face of it, it sounds ideal for what I need it for.
But magazine reports are one thing, info from regular user are
sometimes something else.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Collin" <glendining@noaddy.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tclt91pab61bht33tpg94o70l199it1adt@4ax.com...
> I am on the verge of buying this model. I have read a number of
> reviews and reports but I would like to hear from users of this
> camera. On the face of it, it sounds ideal for what I need it for.
> But magazine reports are one thing, info from regular user are
> sometimes something else.
>
> Collin.
I have had a DMC-LC1 for about three months now and it was my first venture
into digital photography. I decided to go digital after coming back from a
trip to Japan, Korea & China and realising that I had about a 25 x 36exp
films to get processed. Even just getting 6 x 4 prints cost well over one
hundred Pounds.
I wanted a camera which was easy to use but not just an automated automatic,
so after much searching I chose the Panasonic. After all, if Leica were
putting their name to it it had to be good!
I am pleased with this camera and even purchased a DMC-FZ20 to take
advantage of the Leica 430mm lens on a recent safari.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Thursday 02 June 2005 02:55, Collin wrote:
> I am on the verge of buying this model. I have read a number of
> reviews and reports but I would like to hear from users of this
> camera. On the face of it, it sounds ideal for what I need it for.
> But magazine reports are one thing, info from regular user are
> sometimes something else.
I once was considering the LC-1, but my opinion is that it's way
overpriced for a point-n-shoot with the image quality being no better
than other point-n-shoots for 1/3 (or less) the price. This was based
on my own practical tests done at a photo trade show with the other
cameras I was considering.
Now, if they made it with an 8 megapixel APS-size CMOS sensor like in
the Canon Rebel or 20D -- very low noise at all ISOs, very "smooth"
images -- it would be worth it even without interchangeable lenses.
And I'd even learn to live with that LCD viewfinder. Hated it!
--
Stefan Patric
NoLife Polymath Group
tootek2@yahoo.com
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.