I was given a Radeon 6450 for Christmas.
From what I've read elsewhere and from the Hierarchy Charts here, it seems to be pretty much on par with the 8600GTS I have at the moment
Both are PCI Express. The 8600GTS has 256MB of memory, a huge fan and requires additional power.
The 6450 on the other hand has 1gb of memory, a passive heatsink and no extra power requirement. It also has the bonus of supporting DirectX11.
Now I feel as if I should switch to the 6450 but my last experience with a Radeon was many years ago with the 9250 and that was a nightmare when trying to get Knights of the Old Republic to work. So I've been a bit biased against them ever since.
So would it be worth me switching to the 6450? Are they easier cards to work with now or should I stick with the 8600GTS?
From what I've read elsewhere and from the Hierarchy Charts here, it seems to be pretty much on par with the 8600GTS I have at the moment
Both are PCI Express. The 8600GTS has 256MB of memory, a huge fan and requires additional power.
The 6450 on the other hand has 1gb of memory, a passive heatsink and no extra power requirement. It also has the bonus of supporting DirectX11.
Now I feel as if I should switch to the 6450 but my last experience with a Radeon was many years ago with the 9250 and that was a nightmare when trying to get Knights of the Old Republic to work. So I've been a bit biased against them ever since.
So would it be worth me switching to the 6450? Are they easier cards to work with now or should I stick with the 8600GTS?