Is the 560 448 cores worth it over a 570?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Solution


images


Okay, I give you that one... The 570 is the better card between the two he posted up.

However, being that this is a technical forum, we as members would still like to inform the OP about both of the cards, their capabilities, price to performance ratio, and so for. The OP may not have asked which card was the better bang for his buck, if he cared about voiding warranty, and/or...

toneekay

Distinguished
Jun 28, 2011
564
0
19,010
Get the 448 cores, even though it's "crippled," you still save $70 for nearly the same performance. Plus, you won't even be able to tell the difference while gaming besides the extra 70 bucks lost in which you could almost buy an SSD with, or a fancy dinner for two.
 

mdsiu

Distinguished
Oct 1, 2010
448
0
18,860


The clock speeds are significantly different. You get what you pay for.
 

mdsiu

Distinguished
Oct 1, 2010
448
0
18,860


Maybe it's an option for you. You can't assume everyone is willing to damage and/or void the warranty on their gpu. The question was which one to get. The 570 is a better board in any scenario. He didnt ask which card was better bang for buck.
 

toneekay

Distinguished
Jun 28, 2011
564
0
19,010


images


Okay, I give you that one... The 570 is the better card between the two he posted up.

However, being that this is a technical forum, we as members would still like to inform the OP about both of the cards, their capabilities, price to performance ratio, and so for. The OP may not have asked which card was the better bang for his buck, if he cared about voiding warranty, and/or etc... but it's still in his best interest to know all of this info so he could at least have knowledge of what he's getting himself into.

OP, here's a good read if you want to know more about the 448 cores:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-ti-448-core-benchmark,3082.html

Good luck with whatever you chose.
 
Solution
Status
Not open for further replies.