Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Smart Media Vs. Other Media

Smart Media Vs. Other Media

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - Smart Media Vs. Other Media

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

I have notices that prices on Smart Media Cards are way more than the
prices of just any other media (at least at Wal-Mart) - can anyone
shed some light onto why the smart media is so much more - I would
really like to know, since this is what I use.

Thanks,
Scott

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

None wrote:

> I have notices that prices on Smart Media Cards are way more than the
> prices of just any other media (at least at Wal-Mart) - can anyone
> shed some light onto why the smart media is so much more - I would
> really like to know, since this is what I use.
>


Economy of scale, also might be harder to make since it is so thin? I've
stuck with CF based cameras for this reason.
--

Stacey

Reply to Stacey

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

None <Mine@something.com> writes:

> I have notices that prices on Smart Media Cards are way more than the
> prices of just any other media (at least at Wal-Mart) - can anyone
> shed some light onto why the smart media is so much more - I would
> really like to know, since this is what I use.

It's obsolete. The companies who used to make it are still serving
the very small existing market, but the prices have to be higher to
justify their effort on the small volume.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Stacey wrote:
> None wrote:
>
>
>>I have notices that prices on Smart Media Cards are way more than the
>>prices of just any other media (at least at Wal-Mart) - can anyone
>>shed some light onto why the smart media is so much more - I would
>>really like to know, since this is what I use.
>>
>
>
>
> Economy of scale, also might be harder to make since it is so thin? I've
> stuck with CF based cameras for this reason.

Smartmedia is dead, mainly because it wasn't 'smart', didn't have an
onboard controller, and was limited to smaller capacities. The cards
were too thin for use in rough conditions, and the contacts were
unprotected, and subject to bad contact. If you have a camera that uses
them, it is time to upgrade.


--
Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Ron Hunter wrote:
>
> Smartmedia is dead, mainly because it wasn't 'smart',
> didn't have an onboard controller


True and funny that Compact Flash isn't compact <g>.

I think SM are expensive because they are dead. I've got a camera that
uses them... have to be careful to keep the gold surface clean.


--
Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
san francisco native plants

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

I would never want a camera that uses them because they are so small. I
prefer compact flash because it is a decent size and much less easily lost
than smaller cards. It's sort of the same reason I cringe when I hear ads
for digital cameras as being smaller and lighter. For stability and sharper
images I want bigger and heavier cameras.
Craig Flory

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Craig Flory" <floryphotog@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:BpFpe.981$NX4.682@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>I would never want a camera that uses them because they are so small. I
> prefer compact flash because it is a decent size and much less easily lost
> than smaller cards. It's sort of the same reason I cringe when I hear ads
> for digital cameras as being smaller and lighter. For stability and
> sharper
> images I want bigger and heavier cameras.
> Craig Flory
>
>
?? Smart media was just as big, but not as thick as CF. Are you thinking of
MMC, SD or the tiny xD?

I like the size of CF for my SLR, but the xD is great for my compact.
John

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Smart Media Vs. Other Media
Go to:

There are 1241 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them