I just wanted to comment on a trend I have been noticing. It seems like the great price deflation and power inflation in the graphics industry has been slowing down. At least in the midrange segment. (OK, even then, mostly nvidia)
Here's the thing, I got a Geforce 9800GTX+ back in winter of, like, '09. That was a card released in what, June of '08? It was about $150 or something like that.
128 Cores
512MiB RAM
256-bit
~$150
This card has lasted me quite a while, but when looking at benchmarks, it seems dwarfed by the latest top-end cards.
But then I look back at the midrange. After, like, 3.5 years, $150 isn't getting you much further. I'm usually seeing this config for NVIDIA:
192 cores
1GiB RAM
128-bit
$120-$150
Wow...
Compare that to my upgrade before: 6600GT - 9800GTX+ Both at the same price points at the time.
It seemed like there was a large spike between the 6-8 series, (5-8 comparison is rediculous). But after that, it seems like they started doing a bunch of rebranding of chips, adding a few efficiency measures here and there, and a die size shrink, with what seems like little performance difference at the same price points.
I know there are a lot of variables, like AMD vs NVIDIA, Efficiency in DX10 and DX11 applications, power consumption, etc. Not to mention the fact that games haven't really pulled a doom3 or Crysis graphics jump since, well, Crysis.
I'm just wondering if I'm the only one noticing this.
I originally had projected an upgrade pattern of a midrange card every 3 years being a reasonable upgrade. Now I'm looking, and the only thing that really dates my 9800GTX to the new midrange stuff is RAM and tesselation. Everything else is merely incremental.
Here's the thing, I got a Geforce 9800GTX+ back in winter of, like, '09. That was a card released in what, June of '08? It was about $150 or something like that.
128 Cores
512MiB RAM
256-bit
~$150
This card has lasted me quite a while, but when looking at benchmarks, it seems dwarfed by the latest top-end cards.
But then I look back at the midrange. After, like, 3.5 years, $150 isn't getting you much further. I'm usually seeing this config for NVIDIA:
192 cores
1GiB RAM
128-bit
$120-$150
Wow...
Compare that to my upgrade before: 6600GT - 9800GTX+ Both at the same price points at the time.
It seemed like there was a large spike between the 6-8 series, (5-8 comparison is rediculous). But after that, it seems like they started doing a bunch of rebranding of chips, adding a few efficiency measures here and there, and a die size shrink, with what seems like little performance difference at the same price points.
I know there are a lot of variables, like AMD vs NVIDIA, Efficiency in DX10 and DX11 applications, power consumption, etc. Not to mention the fact that games haven't really pulled a doom3 or Crysis graphics jump since, well, Crysis.
I'm just wondering if I'm the only one noticing this.
I originally had projected an upgrade pattern of a midrange card every 3 years being a reasonable upgrade. Now I'm looking, and the only thing that really dates my 9800GTX to the new midrange stuff is RAM and tesselation. Everything else is merely incremental.