4745454b :
You and that Intel fanboy crap again. You're wrong, and its seriously getting old.
So is ignoring the truth.
Hardly.
The Phenom II is not an FX, its a completely different design, so lets not even bring those up. I'll ignore any mention to that, not because its the truth, but because its completely irrelevant.
First, seeing as the scores you posted are almost identical that you just showed it takes an AMD QUAD CORE clocked over a GHz higher to equal/slightly best a DUAL CORE chip with HT?
An i5-2300 is a QUAD CORE w/ 4 physical cores, unless I'm wrong? . Sandy Bridge is new technology. Phenom II uses older technology, and yet its on-par with a more expensive Sandy Bridge. THATS MY POINT. sorry you missed it. Who cares what the clock rate difference is? Seriously? My point was a price vs performance comparison. 140 dollar chip vs 180 dollar chip. Pay attention.
Four real cores clocked 1.2GHz higher should have smashed that dual core w/HT. If AMD was half the company you think it is those scores would be vastly different.
Again, the i5-2300 is a quad core w/ 4 physical cores.
Second, I'm assuming the OP is talking about gaming with this rig. What does Toms say about this?
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 120-9.html
I don't really care what Tom says about it. And yes, I've read that article before in its entirety more than once. The difference is horseshoes and hand grenades across the board, if you actually look at the scores and compare current prices rather than skipping to the conclusion page.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-fx-pentium-apu-benchmark,3120-4.html
Okay, so they're identical. I'll concede the point there.
----
I'm not going to go thru all these game benchmarks with you, all of them fall into the category of, the difference is impossible to detect with the human eye.