Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Hello,
I'm searching for a little web applcation wich I already saw but can't
remember the adress.
The point is to make a little gallery of thumbnails only in feeding it
with the url of a web repository wich contains images, even if the
directory contains no html but the web server respond a list of files.
Then it generates a webpage with the images resized in small size(à la
<img src"example.com/images/dc1233.jpg" width="10%" height="10%" /> ).
Your browser is responsible for the quality of the thumbnail, it's
bandwith-hungry, but it's simple an handy.
I saw several web apps who can do that. In most cases, they have a
"popular" feature, with a list of the most visited directories (who are
often some babes).
I just can't remember any adress, I've searched for it seriously, but
here I'm exausted. Any Idea?
"Marc Lacoste" <marc.lacoste@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118769665.552492.64400@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Hello,
I'm searching for a little web applcation wich I already saw but can't
remember the adress.
The point is to make a little gallery of thumbnails only in feeding it
with the url of a web repository wich contains images, even if the
directory contains no html but the web server respond a list of files.
Then it generates a webpage with the images resized in small size(à la
<img src"example.com/images/dc1233.jpg" width="10%" height="10%" /> ).
Your browser is responsible for the quality of the thumbnail, it's
bandwith-hungry, but it's simple an handy.
I saw several web apps who can do that. In most cases, they have a
"popular" feature, with a list of the most visited directories (who are
often some babes).
I just can't remember any adress, I've searched for it seriously, but
here I'm exausted. Any Idea?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On 14 Jun 2005 in rec.photo.digital, Marc Lacoste wrote:
> thanks, but it's not that kind of thing.
>
> imagine you've got a directory on the web, http://example.com/images/ > with only images, no html. the server give you a list.
>
> I just want a service wich you enter the url, and voila. like
> http://service.net/example.com/images/ >
> do you see what i mean?
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Joe Makowiec wrote:
> On 14 Jun 2005 in rec.photo.digital, Marc Lacoste wrote:
>
>
>>thanks, but it's not that kind of thing.
>>
>>imagine you've got a directory on the web, http://example.com/images/ >>with only images, no html. the server give you a list.
>>
>>I just want a service wich you enter the url, and voila. like
>>http://service.net/example.com/images/
>>
>>do you see what i mean?
>>
>
>
> Singapore? Requires a server which supports PHP:
>
> http://singapore.sourceforge.net/ >
> Once you have it set up, you put images into a subdirectory, and it
> automatically creates the gallery.
Sounds like what OP wants:
"singapore is yet another open source PHP based image gallery web
application.
....
It does NOT require MySQL or other database programs since all image
information is stored in flat text CSV files"
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Marc Lacoste wrote:
> nope, I don't want any software, i just want a website.
>
> thanks for your help, anyway
>
> can anyone can reformulate what i'm thinking? i've got some trouble to
> express myself.
That's software you load on your web site. People just see plain web
pages & it's easy to add pictures for you. Probably more hassle than you
guessed to set up but I believe this is a good solution for your needs.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Marc Lacoste wrote:
> nope, I don't want any software, i just want a website.
>
> thanks for your help, anyway
>
> can anyone can reformulate what i'm thinking? i've got some trouble
> to
> express myself.
I use http://www.fototime.com. On the most basic level you connect,
Name an album,
choose Upload Photos,
browse to the source on your disk,
select the photos you want to display,
choose Upload,
wait for the transmission to complete,
choose Return to photos,
view your gallery.
http://www.fototime.com/inv/FF405962CAC40AF
Once the photos are up there you can change their order, add captions,
move or copy them from album to album, rename albums, et cetera.
When viewers are looking at a photo, they can choose to see it small,
medium, large, or original size
Fototime has proprietary software you can use to organize and upload,
but I've never tried it.
They have printing services (ClubPhoto, I think) and you can allow
viewers to use them or not.
Thirty-day free trial, 500MB storage and 10x that bandwidth per month
for about $2.00 a month payable yearly in advance if you decide to use
the service. They will also host your videos for an additional $18.00
per year.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
OK I get it.
How much would you pay for this? <grin>
Marc Lacoste wrote:
> Argh! it's near, but no, not really! thanks all (and flickr and buzznet
> are interesting, but it's not the point)
>
> say you've got a directory like http://marc.lacoste.free.fr/images/ >
> here is a small website, http://gallery-generator.example.com/ with
> only a form into, to submit an url.
>
> he parses the list, and generates a little html in
> http://gallery-generator.example.c [...] fr/images/ if
> the cgi is good:
>
> <img src="http://marc.lacoste.free.fr/images/IledYeu.jpg" width="10%"
> height="10%" />
> <img src="http://marc.lacoste.free.fr/images/laRochelle.jpgwidth="10%"
> height="10%" />
> <img src="http://marc.lacoste.free.fr/images/ondine.jpgwidth="10%"
> height="10%" />
>
> see it: http://marc.lacoste.free.fr/images.html (warning: there is 5 MB
> of images, and the resize is only in your browser, every bit is
> downloaded)
>
> someone understands?
>
I now understand, but your inability to express what you want in an
answerable problem statement, and being annoyed as to why people
aren't giving you usable answers makes you very nearly too annoying to
help further.
I'd still say that you DO want album creation software which many nice
folks suggested to you. Problem is that you just don't know that's
what you want.
You'd do the processing/creation on your local PC, have the software
resize your photos and generate navigation and stuff, and then upload
the whole ball of wax to your free website.
Versus the workflow you stubbornly seem to want, local album creation
software saves you the trouble of uploading humongous full resolution
graphics up to a site to take up space when in fact they may be bigger
than you want to display on a webpage anyway.
see what i was meaning? not a local processing tool, in fact.
> your inability to express what you want in an
> answerable problem statement, and being annoyed as to why people
> aren't giving you usable answers
i was irritated because of my inability to express myself, not because
of your answers. i give plenty of thanks to all the people who tried to
help me.
besides, you certainly saw that english isn't my native language, wich
did not help.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.