Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

Building a new monster gaming system, need video advice!

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
January 26, 2012 1:39:17 PM

I'm an old school pc builder - but I haven't built a new machine in a few years and seem to have lost my touch. I am building an i7 2600K based system, 8-16gb ram, and want to run an Eyefinity card for multimonitor gaming. The last card I bought was an 8800 GTX Nvidia (years ago! lol) and want this next machine to be a beast. I'm not worried about the cost, but obviously don't want to spend 4000 on a pc. So if I could get some opinions/advice on an ATI Eyefinity card that would work for me, that would be awesome.

APPROXIMATE PURCHASE DATE: Next couple of weeks
BUDGET RANGE: around 300-400 for video

USAGE:Gaming - BF3, COD, Crysis, etc.

PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg

PARTS PREFERENCES: I'm REALLY interested in the Eyefinity stuff, I'm looking to do at least 3 monitors - no real plans on anymore than that at the moment.

OVERCLOCKING: Maybe
SLI OR CROSSFIRE: Maybe


Thanks in advance for your tips!
a c 80 U Graphics card
a b 4 Gaming
January 26, 2012 1:55:01 PM

right now, radeon hd 7970 (pcie 3.0) is the most powerful gpu on the market. and it supports eyefinity.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/amd-radeon-hd-7970-r...
at's review because they tested it on a pcie 3.0 machine unlike tom's. according to the reviews ... games don't yet show any improvement over pcie 2.0.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-benc...
eyefinity demo:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5420/amds-4k-and-bf3video...
Score
0
a c 291 U Graphics card
a b 4 Gaming
January 26, 2012 2:08:19 PM

Hmm, theoretically, AMD HD6970 could work will 3 monitors at gaming, but with only a single HD6970, you aren't looking at higher than medium graphic settings with 3 monitors (5760x1080 resolution, depending on game of course).
Score
0
Related resources
a c 229 U Graphics card
a c 220 4 Gaming
January 26, 2012 3:03:05 PM

With a $400ish budget, I think the best you can do is twin 560 Ti's

Guru3D uses the following games in their test suite, COD-MW, Bad Company 2, Dirt 2, Far Cry 2, Metro 2033, Dawn of Discovery, Crysis Warhead. Total fps (summing fps in each game @ 1920 x 1200) for the various options in parenthesis (single card / SL or CF) are tabulated below along with their cost in dollars per frame single card - CF or SLI:

$ 170.00 6870 (434/701) $ 0.39 - $ 0.49
$ 220.00 6950 (479/751) $ 0.46 - $ 0.59
$ 240.00 6950 Frozr OC (484/759) $ 0.50 - $ 0.63
$ 205.00 560 Ti (455/792) $ 0.45 - $ 0.52
$ 320.00 6970 (526/825) $ 0.61 - $ 0.78
$ 215.00 560 Ti - 900 Mhz (495/862) $ 0.43 - $ 0.50

A pair of 6870's would be my choice under $400 as it pops out 701 fps in the test suite at a cost of 49 cents per frame. The factory OC'd 6950 is a bit steep at 63 cents per frame and is substantially over budget for 759 fps. At 7.5% over budget ya have the twin factory OC'd 560 Ti's which will get ya 862 fps at a cost just a hair higher than the 6870's (50 cents per frame).....above that, single cards cost more than cheaper cards in SLI / CF.

However ...... tThree monitors is a big load for gaming, if we talking modern, demanding games.....while I'd be comfy w/ one or two 6970's or 560 Ti's for applications and less demanding games, 3 screen gaming including games like Metro 2033, I'd want no less than (3) GTX 580's. As far as the dual GPU cards (6990 / 590) , with a 2nd card adding as little as 10% performance wise, I'm not impressed and my experience with triple CF has been along the lines of what is described here:

http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-6850-6870-cross...

Quote:
So over the years Multi-GPU support has improved quite a bit, AMD still isn't up-to snuff at the level of NVIDIA though, multi-GPU supports still literally and directly remains the Achilles heel of ATI's Catalyst drivers.

So let's round things up, personally we always say stick to one or maybe two high-end cards as there is so much less driver fuzz to worry about. It's like this with ATI, once you pass 2 GPUs you'll often find yourself compromising a lot with new game titles versus multi-GPU support.


One 6970 gets 28 fps in Metro 2033 on just one 23" monitor..... now triple the load and you can expect something in the 10 fps range. Three 580's get above 90 on a single screen in Metro 2033 which should stay perty close to 30 fps on 3 screens. For this kind of gaming, I think it would be a less than satisfying experience if ya wanted to play "maxed out" and I think ya's need to spend close to $1600 to meet that goal..... fortunately, I don't have that goal :) 

EVGA 580 GTX 3072 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...

Note..... turning on 3D cuts into the performance.....if you wanna compare the 580 (47 fps average / 17.3 minimum) versus the 6970 (40.7 fps average / 7.4 minimum), look here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-3d-vision-h...

However..... now we have the 7970 out and the 680 reportedly popping in a few weeks..... with an expected $800-900 investment in monitors and $1000 - $1600 in GFX cards, I think I'd wanna wait and see what develops between now and late Spring.
Score
0

Best solution

a b U Graphics card
January 26, 2012 3:34:28 PM

Shazma0527 said:


BUDGET RANGE: around 300-400 for video




6970 will do 5760 x 1080 but only medium depending on the game. That is the fastest in your price range.
Share
January 27, 2012 12:13:26 PM

Fantastic! You guys are all awesome for your advice! I'm having a hard time assigning the "best answer".
Score
0
January 27, 2012 12:13:55 PM

Best answer selected by Shazma0527.
Score
0
a c 272 U Graphics card
a b 4 Gaming
January 27, 2012 12:15:45 PM

This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey
Score
0
!