I aim for some gaming, maybe Crysis and Just Cause 2 at medium settings 720p. Both of these are 250 GTS, though the Galaxy has a higher shader clock and while I do know that you should not base a video card's performance on it's RAM entirely, the Galaxy also has 1GB DDR3 versus the EVGA 512MB. I plan on dual-screening, playing games on only a single monitor however.
EVGA 512-P3-1141-TR GeForce GTS 250 Video Card
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1367481&csid=ITD&body=MAIN
$40 after rebate
Galaxy Technology GeForce GTS 250 1 GB GDDR3
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003RH09AY/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&me=&seller=
$65
Is the $25 increase justified in the Galaxy card? Do these cards perform well enough that the extra RAM may actually make a difference? Thanks in advance
EVGA 512-P3-1141-TR GeForce GTS 250 Video Card
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1367481&csid=ITD&body=MAIN
$40 after rebate
Galaxy Technology GeForce GTS 250 1 GB GDDR3
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003RH09AY/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&me=&seller=
$65
Is the $25 increase justified in the Galaxy card? Do these cards perform well enough that the extra RAM may actually make a difference? Thanks in advance