I'm getting a new computer (i7-3930, ASUS P9X79 Pro) and new monitors. The main purpose of the system will be programming and number-crunching. Leisure time use will include HD internet TV and videos. It would be nice to play some F1 or Dirt but, if I can't, it really doesn't matter. Gaming is way down on the priority list.
The plan is to start with two 27" monitors at 2560x1440 and, money permitting, add a centre 30" at 2560x1600. The idea is that the 27"ers will be rotated to get a decent width for browser, file system and output windows and excellent height so I can have plenty of them. The IDE will go on the main screen where extra width matters. I currently have a 20" CRT at 1600x1200 for that purpose although in the new system it would become a satellite and one of the 27s would be the centre piece.
There's a good budget for the system, £1500 for the computer and £1500 for monitors, keyboard, mouse and USB pluggables. Half of that is being provided by my sponsor but running the system will be up to me and I need to keep power costs as low as possible. The machine will be analysing data 24/7.
With that in mind, I'm looking to get whatever graphics card(s) will support the monitors and resolutions for the type of work mentioned and maybe, but only as a bonus, not be too shabby at letting me spin a car around a track - but not suck juice as if peak oil is next millenium.
The current system spec has two 560Ti cards, which I understand will be more than up to all tasks, including heavy gaming, but I've been costing the power to run them and it's looking expensive. If that's the case then I want to downgrade. But that might be my ignorance as I don't know what power draw there would be on cards like those for non-gaming work. Would they be effectively at idle most of the time?
If you're wondering why those cards, it's partly because they fit into the budget and partly because at some stage I may investigate the use of CUDA or OpenCL to speed up analysis. But, as that stage is likely to be months away, it might be better not to bother with high-spec cards and just get what I need for the day-to-day windowing and data presentation. Also, I'm eagerly awaiting news and reviews of Intel's Knight's Corner as that may be an easier path to acceleration.
So the first question is what are the power requirements of high-resolution multi-monitor work of a largely non-graphical nature plus the TV and video?
The second question is about range. What cards would be just sufficient to enable my work? What cards would do that comfortably and also make a bit of gaming feasible? And what cards are heading into more than enough for the work and for decent gaming? I can then pick and choose from the selection available at the system builder (Overclockers UK, ATI and Overclockers UK, nVIDIA).
ps. I'm a wordy bunny, I know. ;-) No apologies for that but thank you for reading, and for any interesting thoughts that you might contribute.
The plan is to start with two 27" monitors at 2560x1440 and, money permitting, add a centre 30" at 2560x1600. The idea is that the 27"ers will be rotated to get a decent width for browser, file system and output windows and excellent height so I can have plenty of them. The IDE will go on the main screen where extra width matters. I currently have a 20" CRT at 1600x1200 for that purpose although in the new system it would become a satellite and one of the 27s would be the centre piece.
There's a good budget for the system, £1500 for the computer and £1500 for monitors, keyboard, mouse and USB pluggables. Half of that is being provided by my sponsor but running the system will be up to me and I need to keep power costs as low as possible. The machine will be analysing data 24/7.
With that in mind, I'm looking to get whatever graphics card(s) will support the monitors and resolutions for the type of work mentioned and maybe, but only as a bonus, not be too shabby at letting me spin a car around a track - but not suck juice as if peak oil is next millenium.
The current system spec has two 560Ti cards, which I understand will be more than up to all tasks, including heavy gaming, but I've been costing the power to run them and it's looking expensive. If that's the case then I want to downgrade. But that might be my ignorance as I don't know what power draw there would be on cards like those for non-gaming work. Would they be effectively at idle most of the time?
If you're wondering why those cards, it's partly because they fit into the budget and partly because at some stage I may investigate the use of CUDA or OpenCL to speed up analysis. But, as that stage is likely to be months away, it might be better not to bother with high-spec cards and just get what I need for the day-to-day windowing and data presentation. Also, I'm eagerly awaiting news and reviews of Intel's Knight's Corner as that may be an easier path to acceleration.
So the first question is what are the power requirements of high-resolution multi-monitor work of a largely non-graphical nature plus the TV and video?
The second question is about range. What cards would be just sufficient to enable my work? What cards would do that comfortably and also make a bit of gaming feasible? And what cards are heading into more than enough for the work and for decent gaming? I can then pick and choose from the selection available at the system builder (Overclockers UK, ATI and Overclockers UK, nVIDIA).
ps. I'm a wordy bunny, I know. ;-) No apologies for that but thank you for reading, and for any interesting thoughts that you might contribute.