Nokia 6230 vs Motorola C650

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

for now, 6230 is a shitty phone... try the motorola!


"flahmeshess" <dingdongdingding@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:587d1f91.0404240200.1fc9fe96@posting.google.com...
> How does the Motorola C650 compares to the Nokia 6230 ?

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

I've been having the 6230 for 10 days now, and can't stop enjoying it. As I
read from the description of the Motorola on the internet, I think this
phone (the Motorola) is clearly inferior to the 6230. The motorola has no
mp3 (only mp3 ringtones... maybe for children who like to play?), no radio,
and no memory card support...
So, I wouldn't suggest the Motorola as an alternative to the 6230. For the
moment, the 6230 is the most feature-packed small phone you can find in the
market. I mean with USEFUL features, not silly things for playing.

"MichaelS" <mils@ea.be> wrote in message
news:408b55f1$0$11261$6c56d894@feed0.news.be.easynet.net...
> for now, 6230 is a shitty phone... try the motorola!
>
>
> "flahmeshess" <dingdongdingding@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de
> news:587d1f91.0404240200.1fc9fe96@posting.google.com...
> > How does the Motorola C650 compares to the Nokia 6230 ?
>
>