USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Wanting to max out Battlefield 3 and future proof it on new games
CURRENT GPU AND POWER SUPPLY: No current GPU as new build, 750W ZS PSU
OTHER RELEVANT SYSTEM SPECS: Gigabyte Z68AP-D3, Intel 2500K, 8GB Corsair Vengeance
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Any UK site
PARTS PREFERENCES: Would prefer ATI due to that I can only crossfire on this motherboard and not SLI
OVERCLOCKING: Maybe crossfire
So I'm currently torn between what to choose for my new system. I've narrowed it down to the 6870 Vapor X which can be found at £134. The 560 Ti is £150. The only reason I would go for the 6870 is due to the fact I can crossfire on this motherboard.
My question is, is the 6870 Vapor X the best version of the 6870 out there? should I instead go for the 560 Ti?
Many factors count in this, are the video at 1080p ? ok, are they really at maximum settings, Anti-Aliasing 4x MSAA, Motion Blur on, etc? on ultra you may be able to play, but what i mean is that on some levels/situations the fps will drop below 30. that is out of the playable field, specially while in multiplayer.
Edit: the post up here was not yet placed. good reviews.
Message edited by ricardois on 02-13-2012 at 01:53:34 PM
If you want to 100% max @1080p and future proof, then you're better off with something with more power than the 6950 or 560ti, unless you are crossfiring the 6950's which in that case sure why not. But I'd recommend a 6970 or 7950 instead, then maybe a year from now crossfire.
So what would you suggest? buy a 560 TI instead of going for a 6870 with the future crossfire option?
Neither one will ever max BF3 on it's own at 1080p. 560TI is slightly better (as it would be more comparable to a 6950)...but to max it you're going to have to go multiple GPUs. So if your board only supports Crossfire, I guess that means a 6870 is the right choice for you (I actually have one and love it).
Of course, the going price of the 560TI seems to be ~$200 after MiR...for about $25 more you can have this:
Remember also, anything under the " Cayman " GPU will not render optimum crossfire scaling, Cayman GPU is 6900 series, 6800 series uses Barts ( not as efficient ).
Remember also, anything under the " Cayman " GPU will not render optimum crossfire scaling, Cayman GPU is 6900 series, 6800 series uses Barts ( not as efficient ).
Hmm, that has me leaning towards the 560 Ti to be honest now if that's the case. What's the best bang for buck reference 560 Ti?
Don't forget, I live in the UK so newegg prices don't mean anything to me. I appreciate the help so far!
If you can muster ~$240, then go 6950. That way you can crossfire later. If your goal is under 200 than sure go for the 6870, just lower the MSAA, which is what really kills frames in BF3.
sapphire vapor x is good for keeping gpu cool and quite because of its technology and it overclocks very well but the gtx 560ti is one of the best overclocking gpu so no need to go for an hd 6870 go for an gtx 560ti it will be more future proof then that.
So yes, in an nVidia tuned game (Crysis), the 560TI is ~1FPS ahead of the 5870. Whereas in CoD (which is a "Way It's Meant to be Played" nVidia title, I think?), the 5870 is up by 10%? Looks like a win for the 5870.
well what i wanna say is hd 5870 is of old tech so why to go with that and gtx 560ti is of newer tech and it overclocks very well thats why i m telling him to get that because after overclocking it will perform more better u are also right but after oc it will be better.
You'll note that the 5870 DOES outperform the 560TI. And in fact is closer (~4% less) to a 570.
well like you can see in that benchmark they are using bugged nvidia drivers, so with other drivers the performance may be different... this is a very specific test...
The availability of the 5870 is very limited it seems in the UK, pushing towards the £200 pound mark. I think I'm going to go for a 6870 to tell you the truth, money is a pretty important factor.
The factory OC'd models have to be thought of as separate cards in that the non reference designs have more robust VRM's, larger coolers and other improvements:
Guru3D uses the following games in their test suite, COD-MW, Bad Company 2, Dirt 2, Far Cry 2, Metro 2033, Dawn of Discovery, Crysis Warhead. Total fps (summing fps in each game @ 1920 x 1200) for the various options in parenthesis (single card / SL or CF) are tabulated below along with their cost in dollars per frame single card - CF or SLI:
In a single card configuration, the 6870 has the best bang for the buck at 39 cents per frame (434 fps) .....next up is the factory OC'd 560 Ti at 41 cents per frame (495 fps). When paired, the factory OC'd 560 Ti's 48 cents per frame (862 fps) edges the 6870's 49 cents per frame (701 fps).
The old argument that it doesn't pay to buy factory OC'd cards because ya can just OC them yaself no longer holds. The beefed up VRM's, larger coolers, beefed up PCB's on most of the factory OC'd models allows for larger overclocks than the reference designs.
------------------------------If a man speaks in the forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong ? Reply to JackNaylorPE
yes it will be better to go with hd 6870 no need get an hd 7770 if u think to wait then you should get an hd 7850 that will be better in performance or maybe same as the hd 6870.
New proposition.. 2X6850 in Crossfire (albeit running at 4x/4x although http://www.hardocp.com/article/201 [...] 16_vs_x4x4 shows that this makes little difference) or one single 6870. They both cost around the same.