Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
applications such as family travel.
Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about a
lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
AA's which is an advantage.
Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are available.
Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et> writes:
> I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
> looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
> applications such as family travel.
>
> Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
> battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about a
> lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
> It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
> AA's which is an advantage.
Most people don't think twice. Most people don't get the second
battery, either. Remember, it's not especially beneficial to run down
the lithium-ion rechargeables before recharging. So if the capacity
is good enough for one solid day of shooting for you, you may actually
not need a second battery. Also, NiMH has a high self-discharge rate,
so it doesn't sit around very well.
I, personally, have so far avoided buying any digital camera that I
can't run in NiMH AAs, though.
> Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
> of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
> cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
It's a lot *less* cumbersome for me; one of the drawbacks of my Fuji
S2 DSLR is that I can't shoot using the LCD. You're right about
direct sunlight, though. Some companies make little stick-on hoods
that help a lot with that, but then there's this big fragile box on
the back of your camera, and that's not so convenient either.
> I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are available.
> Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
> through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
> specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
I'd be looking primarily at Canon for compact digital cameras, myself.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailtod-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
There is a reason compact cameras use Lion.... they are Compact...much
higher watt-hrs per pound (or volume).
You have to decide what is most important - cost of batteries or
quality of photographs.
Lion batteries will last a long time, plus the self-discharge is much
lower with Lion,i.e., the spare pack you charge today and put on the
shelf, will have over 90% charge in a couple of months.
I have a Canon 1ds2... talk about a battery pack... it is 10 nimh AA in
a proprietary sealed case. I would much rather have the pack be Lion
and save 12oz or so.
The gap in performance between DSLRs and the consumer cameras is BIG.
I've tried several "arry-around between jobs"and the only passable
camera I've found is a Canon D20, which isn't compact... just smaller
than the 1ds2.
I bought my wife a Canon G6 to throw in her purse when she needed a
camera to take along. It's nice, but still a long way from a DSLR.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Dave C. wrote:
> I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I
> am looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for
> some applications such as family travel.
>
> Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
> battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice
> about a lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which
> I have many? It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than
> those cameras using AA's which is an advantage.
>
> Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are
> dependent of using the back display of the camera to line up the
> shot. It seems cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>
> I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are
> available. Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I
> have been going through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource
> sifting through the specs......and I am still on the steep part of
> the learning curve.
> Any guidance would be very heplful.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dave C.
>
> c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>
> Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
first, as other says, you must decide whether you want small, compact camera
or not necesarilly. Also decide if you want quality or just some
point-and-shoot dummy's camera. Lithiums are small, have bigger capacity,
they doesnt' have memory effect. True, you don't have to empty them before
recharge, but note that every charging, even if you just plug it for a
couple of hours just "in case" counts as complete charge cycle. And
lithitums have only limited charge count. Also they are expensive. Also,
when it happens (and it will one day) that your lithium is flat, all you can
do is watch and curse...while using AA's, you jump into nearest shop, buy a
set of alkaline AA's and go...
not to mention their big price...also lithiums are rarely equipped with so
big capacity as AA's....like 2300 or even 2500 mAh...because when one
decides to install lithium into certain camera, one will count to be small,
and as a result one will build-in low capacity lithium in order to keep
camera small...
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:30:22 -0400, "Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et>
wrote:
>I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
>looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
>applications such as family travel.
>
>Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
>battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about a
>lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
>It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
>AA's which is an advantage.
Is that $50 the manufacturer's price? If so, there are many third
party batteries that are just as good, and far less expensive.
For my Digital Rebel/300D, I have 2 batteries, one that came with the
camera (Canon's, obviously), and a Chinese battery that I got for far
less than Canon wants. I can't tell the difference in use.
>
>Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
>of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
>cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
But there are plenty with, so buy one that has one.
>
>I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are available.
>Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
>through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
>specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
>
>Any guidance would be very heplful.
Pick the characteristics you want; MP count, lens zoom and coverage,
size, 'geegaws' (bells & whistles), neckstrap or no, etc. That will
help narrow down your final short list.
>
>Regards
>
>
>Dave C.
>
>c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>
>Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Dave C. wrote:
> I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
> looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
> applications such as family travel.
>
> Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
> battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about a
> lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
> It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
> AA's which is an advantage.
>
> Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
> of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
> cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>
> I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are available.
> Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
> through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
> specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
>
> Any guidance would be very heplful.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dave C.
>
> c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>
> Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
>
>
>
First suggestion: Don't limit your search to just two manufacturers.
Don't disregard a camera just because it doesn't fit the battery type,
or the flash card type you have in mind. These aren't really 'show
stoppers', and have little bearing on how well the camera will serve
your needs.
Look for flexibility, and picture quality, and don't take the reviewer's
word for it, LOOK at the examples!
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Did you mean lithium or lithium-ion batteries? There's a big difference
between the two. I'll assume you meant Li-ion.
> I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
> looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
> applications such as family travel.
It depends what you mean by "compact". If you want an ultracompact one
that can easily be carried in your pocket, then Li-ion is pretty much
your only choice. On the other hand, if the smallest camera that uses
AA is small enough for you, then get that one.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et> wrote in message
news:42bb7083.0@paperboy.c4.net...
>I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
>looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
>applications such as family travel.
>
> Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
> battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about
> a lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have
> many? It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras
> using AA's which is an advantage.
>
> Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
> of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
> cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>
> I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are
> available. Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have
> been going through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting
> through the specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning
> curve.
>
> Any guidance would be very heplful.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dave C.
>
Lithiums generally offer more feedback to the user than NiMh. While AA
batteries are very convenient, that's what I have in my point and shoot,
lithium batteries can often tell you how much time is left, or at least
offer a set of bars running down or something.
It's always a compromise of some kind. Look at user comments at Amazon, or
someplace like that, and just make a decision. Keep in mind that they can
make cameras that use lithium batteries quite small, while cameras that use
AA batteries can't be any smaller than the battery. AAA batteries don't
offer much in the way of power reserve.
Some of my clients have those tiny Optio cameras and I've never heard a
complaint about battery life. I have an Optio that uses AA's and it seems
to be okay, but I carry an extra set with me. My D70 never seems to run out
of juice. Not sure how they do it.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"egb" <eborys@martinauto.com> writes:
> There is a reason compact cameras use Lion.... they are Compact...much
> higher watt-hrs per pound (or volume).
>
> You have to decide what is most important - cost of batteries or
> quality of photographs.
So you're claiming that compactness contributes to quality of
photographs? Because otherwise that doesn't make any sense.
> Lion batteries will last a long time, plus the self-discharge is much
> lower with Lion,i.e., the spare pack you charge today and put on the
> shelf, will have over 90% charge in a couple of months.
Lion batteries will last about three years, unless you use them so
heavily that you'll hit the number of recharge cycle limit first (very
unlikely).
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailtod-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net> writes:
> First suggestion: Don't limit your search to just two manufacturers.
Good advice. Especially since he didn't include the most prolific
manufacturer of digital camera models.
> Don't disregard a camera just because it doesn't fit the battery type,
> or the flash card type you have in mind. These aren't really 'show
> stoppers', and have little bearing on how well the camera will serve
> your needs.
They're show-stoppers for me. Worrying about multiple chargers and
battery types and card types on a trip is just not on. Also,
duplicating my power system and my collection of memory cards would
add a considerable increment to the cost of any new camera that
required different types.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailtod-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:36:02 -0700, Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com>
wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:30:22 -0400, "Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et>
>wrote:
>
>>I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
>>looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
>>applications such as family travel.
>>
>>Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
>>battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about a
>>lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
>>It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
>>AA's which is an advantage.
>
>Is that $50 the manufacturer's price? If so, there are many third
>party batteries that are just as good, and far less expensive.
>For my Digital Rebel/300D, I have 2 batteries, one that came with the
>camera (Canon's, obviously), and a Chinese battery that I got for far
>less than Canon wants. I can't tell the difference in use.
Try thomas-distributing.com for good prices on batteries.
>>
>>Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
>>of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
>>cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>
>But there are plenty with, so buy one that has one.
I'm very happy with the size and results from my Pentax S5i. It's not
up to my Nikon D70, but that doesn't fit in an Altoids box.
>>
>>I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are available.
>>Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
>>through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
>>specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
>>
>>Any guidance would be very heplful.
>
>Pick the characteristics you want; MP count, lens zoom and coverage,
>size, 'geegaws' (bells & whistles), neckstrap or no, etc. That will
>help narrow down your final short list.
>
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>
>>Dave C.
>>
>>c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>>
>>Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
>>
>>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Thanks for all the replies......all with great personal opinions. It gives
me a lot to look at, L-ion for size vs. the AAs for the other reasons.
Grateful for the help. Went to Best Buy to view and handle their many
cameras on the display. I'll take my time. I am going on a trip in a month
or so, and will make a decision by then.
Regards,
--
Dave C.
c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
"Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et> wrote in message
news:42bb7083.0@paperboy.c4.net...
>I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
>looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
>applications such as family travel.
>
> Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
> battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about
> a lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have
> many? It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras
> using AA's which is an advantage.
>
> Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are dependent
> of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
> cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>
> I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are
> available. Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have
> been going through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting
> through the specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning
> curve.
>
> Any guidance would be very heplful.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dave C.
>
> c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>
> Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Oliver, thanks for your information and for reminding me about
thomas-distributing. That is where I got some AA's and my charger a while
ago and had forgotten about them.
--
Dave C.
c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
"Oliver Costich" <olc-caNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3gjob1ddb2ei9ikvoai0r2uhsvmkm0jiaf@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:36:02 -0700, Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:30:22 -0400, "Dave C." <c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I own a Fuji 3800 SLR that uses AA batteries. Because of its size, I am
>>>looking for a compact type that I can carry in my shirt pocket for some
>>>applications such as family travel.
>>>
>>>Well, with a proprietary battery like a lithium type, buying a backup
>>>battery adds another $50 or so to the price. Would one think twice about
>>>a
>>>lithium battery camera because of this....vs. the AA's which I have many?
>>>It appears that the lithium cameras are thinner than those cameras using
>>>AA's which is an advantage.
>>
>>Is that $50 the manufacturer's price? If so, there are many third
>>party batteries that are just as good, and far less expensive.
>>For my Digital Rebel/300D, I have 2 batteries, one that came with the
>>camera (Canon's, obviously), and a Chinese battery that I got for far
>>less than Canon wants. I can't tell the difference in use.
>
> Try thomas-distributing.com for good prices on batteries.
>
>>>
>>>Also, some cameras have no optical view finder and therefore are
>>>dependent
>>>of using the back display of the camera to line up the shot. It seems
>>>cumbersome to me especially in direct sunlight.
>>
>>But there are plenty with, so buy one that has one.
>
> I'm very happy with the size and results from my Pentax S5i. It's not
> up to my Nikon D70, but that doesn't fit in an Altoids box.
>
>>>
>>>I am overwhelmed at the number of these compact cameras that are
>>>available.
>>>Between Olympus and Fujifilm, I know I'll find one. I have been going
>>>through www.dpreview.com, and excellent resource sifting through the
>>>specs......and I am still on the steep part of the learning curve.
>>>
>>>Any guidance would be very heplful.
>>
>>Pick the characteristics you want; MP count, lens zoom and coverage,
>>size, 'geegaws' (bells & whistles), neckstrap or no, etc. That will
>>help narrow down your final short list.
>>
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>Dave C.
>>>
>>>c9ar9dar9elli@9c4.n9et
>>>
>>>Remove the five 9's (leave the 4) for email.
>>>
>>>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.