The Xeon E3-1230 V2 (ivy bridge) $235
4 cores with hyperthreading enabled
no integrated graphics (Ive got a gtx 670)
no overclocking potential (but I'm not interested in overclocking)
1155 socket
vs
The i7 3770 Ivy bridge $349
4 cores with hyperthreading enabled
Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics
1155 socket
Some benchmark data:
http://www.servethehome.com/intel-xeon-e31230-v2-ivy-bridge-xeon-review-4c8t-33ghz/
If you compare these 2 processors.. benchmarks are practically identical.. I know the Xeon is a server processor meant for heavier loads, but the price difference for almost equivalent performance is $100 dollars! I have a friend constantly throwing benchmark results at me and it is hard to argue when the Xeon seems to equal or best the 3770
when i try and research this people tend to say go with the 3770.. but nobody ever says why.
If this really is a diamond in the rough.. Why don't more people seem to own this?
4 cores with hyperthreading enabled
no integrated graphics (Ive got a gtx 670)
no overclocking potential (but I'm not interested in overclocking)
1155 socket
vs
The i7 3770 Ivy bridge $349
4 cores with hyperthreading enabled
Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics
1155 socket
Some benchmark data:
http://www.servethehome.com/intel-xeon-e31230-v2-ivy-bridge-xeon-review-4c8t-33ghz/
If you compare these 2 processors.. benchmarks are practically identical.. I know the Xeon is a server processor meant for heavier loads, but the price difference for almost equivalent performance is $100 dollars! I have a friend constantly throwing benchmark results at me and it is hard to argue when the Xeon seems to equal or best the 3770
when i try and research this people tend to say go with the 3770.. but nobody ever says why.
If this really is a diamond in the rough.. Why don't more people seem to own this?