So a few year back (when the FIRST Crysis came out) I built myself a nice rig however its starting to show its age a little bit... I am debating whether or not to get a GTX 660 or 670 soon, (and a new HDD). It currently has a GTX 260 core 216 (up from a 8800GT when i first got it )in it which does well in BF3 medium settings, but chugs at high settings... same thing with Crysis 2.
Now here's the problem, I am worried that the Q6600 (I have to keep at stock 2.4Ghz, my mobo is crap) will bottleneck a GTX 660 or 670 to the point where it wouldn't be worth upgrading the GPU alone. If I have to replace the Q6600 to an i5 or 7 series, that means new socket, new mobo, new ram, new cooler etc etc. and thats just too expensive for me right now.
So, upgrade GPU or wait and redo the whole system in a year or 2?(it would really be nice to have something for when crysis 3 comes out)
Current System:
600w PSU
Q6600 (w/ all-in-one coolermaster liquid cooling, looking to replace)
ASUS P5N-32E SLI
4GB corsair dominator ram (forgot the speed, its decent)
GTX 260 core 216 (OC to 666, 1150 ish)
Now here's the problem, I am worried that the Q6600 (I have to keep at stock 2.4Ghz, my mobo is crap) will bottleneck a GTX 660 or 670 to the point where it wouldn't be worth upgrading the GPU alone. If I have to replace the Q6600 to an i5 or 7 series, that means new socket, new mobo, new ram, new cooler etc etc. and thats just too expensive for me right now.
So, upgrade GPU or wait and redo the whole system in a year or 2?(it would really be nice to have something for when crysis 3 comes out)
Current System:
600w PSU
Q6600 (w/ all-in-one coolermaster liquid cooling, looking to replace)
ASUS P5N-32E SLI
4GB corsair dominator ram (forgot the speed, its decent)
GTX 260 core 216 (OC to 666, 1150 ish)