Intel i5 vs amd a6
Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Hello,
For multitasking, which one is faster, and for graphics which one is better?
Thanks!
For multitasking, which one is faster, and for graphics which one is better?
Thanks!
More about : intel amd
COLGeek said:
What specific i5 and A6 are you asking to compare?The slowest i5 still runs circles around most of AMD's fastest CPUs in multitasking benchmarks while AMD's slowest A-series IGP is faster than Intel's HD4000 so it makes little difference which chip the OP is asking about, the outcome remains the same.
In terms of balance between CPU-power, GPU-power and price though, AMD is much closer to the sweet-spot than Intel is.
Related ressources
- AMD A6 4400m vs Intel i5 - Forum
- AMD A6 vs . INTEL i5 (basic question) - Forum
- I3, i5 vs . Amd A6 , A8 - Forum
- Amd a6 3500 apu processor is vs to intel core i3 - Forum
- Amd quad core a6 3400m vs intel core i5-2430m - Forum
DarkOutlaw said:
i5 3570k and the i5 2500k are the two strongest chips on the market for gaming.i7 3770k and the i7 2600k are the two strongest chips on the market for multi tasking.
AMD are the best chips if you cannot afford an i3.
That statement is pure fail
i5 2500k/3570k is the best value chip for performance gaming..... there are i7's that outperform it so its not the strongest
Your multitasking statement forgets socket 2011 cpu's, xeons, opterons.........................
and AMD is for people that cant afford an i3 is just full on fingerlicking dumb and sounds like a fanboi/child statement who cant see past gaming benches
wr6133 said:
That statement is pure faili5 2500k/3570k is the best value chip for performance gaming..... there are i7's that outperform it so its not the strongest
Your multitasking statement forgets socket 2011 cpu's, xeons, opterons.........................
and AMD is for people that cant afford an i3 is just full on fingerlicking dumb and sounds like a fanboi/child statement who cant see past gaming benches
Ok yes its a fail, i forgot about the socket 2011 cpu's etc etc etc. They are the best for multitasking, if you wanna spend gobs of money on multitasking you will never be able to utilize in the next 10 years. Yes I cannot see past benchmarks...because they are benchmarks. And I think the term 'fingerlicking dumb' sounds like it should stay in your house...where the term probably originated...
If you did do your homework you know that games do not take advantage of hyper-threading, so its pointless in a gaming rig. Due to various other issues with hyper-threading that I will not get into, because you can google on your own...I hope..., The i5 is better mostly due to the ability to overclock them.
@OP - your best bet is an i7 + GPU, or an i5 + GPU. Integrated graphics are great for like....troubleshooting....and troubleshooting...oh and laptops.
Best solution
The i5 is the better multi-tasker of the 2:
http://ark.intel.com/products/53450/Intel-Core-i5-2430M...
The A6 has the better video solution, overall:
http://products.amd.com/%28S%282zjjbn45rflurej2sajvybaq...
Both effectively have 4 cores (Intel has 2 cores with HT for the ability to support 4 threads). The A6 has 4 cores.
http://ark.intel.com/products/53450/Intel-Core-i5-2430M...
The A6 has the better video solution, overall:
http://products.amd.com/%28S%282zjjbn45rflurej2sajvybaq...
Both effectively have 4 cores (Intel has 2 cores with HT for the ability to support 4 threads). The A6 has 4 cores.
COLGeek said:
The i5 is the better multi-tasker of the 2:http://ark.intel.com/products/53450/Intel-Core-i5-2430M...
The A6 has the better video solution, overall:
http://products.amd.com/%28S%282zjjbn45rflurej2sajvybaq...
Both effectively have 4 cores (Intel has 2 cores with HT for the ability to support 4 threads). The A6 has 4 cores.
Only i5 laptop chips are 2 cores hyper-threaded. Desktop i5 chips are 4 cores no HT.
there are desktop i5's but in my case I already have a laptop hp dv6000, but need a much bigger screen and something faster for work so I ended up purchasing an acer desktop with an amd a6 3620 but now I found out about intel's widi and second guessing my purchase, i mean who wouldn't want more flexibility or mobility with a laptop, even though I'm not sure I really need it.
cpudemo said:
there are desktop i5's but in my case I already have a laptop hp dv6000, but need a much bigger screen and something faster for work so I ended up purchasing an acer desktop with an amd a6 3620 but now I found out about intel's widi and second guessing my purchase, i mean who wouldn't want more flexibility or mobility with a laptop, even though I'm not sure I really need it.Understood. So, what kind of multi-tasking are you doing?
DarkOutlaw said:
Kinda pointless to compare a laptop vs desktop...like apples and oranges. If this is for gaming, a laptop shouldn't even be a consideration.I am not sure about that (not gaming with laptops). Gaming with HD3000 should definitely be avoided, that I do agree on.
My Alienware M15X is definitely a great mobile gaming rig, but it was built to be so. General purpose notebooks/laptops will not perform as well.
COLGeek said:
I am not sure about that (not gaming with laptops). Gaming with HD3000 should definitely be avoided, that I do agree on.My Alienware M15X is definitely a great mobile gaming rig, but it was built to be so. General purpose notebooks/laptops will not perform as well.
That is correct, because your Alienware does not use integrated graphics. 9 times out of 10 people cannot afford an Alienware laptop (I know I can't) So I normally avoid the suggestion. And I could be mistaken, but All Alienware computers should come with an i7 + GPU, which is what my first suggestion is.
Quote:
Ok yes its a fail, i forgot about the socket 2011 cpu's etc etc etc. They are the best for multitasking, if you wanna spend gobs of money on multitasking you will never be able to utilize in the next 10 years.No you made a statement as if fact so there is not etc etc etc your facts were wrong gobs of money does not factor in your original statement. The fact you think nobody can utilise 2011 for the next 10 years proves my point you are clueless beyond a few gaming benchmarks.
Quote:
And I think the term 'fingerlicking dumb' sounds like it should stay in your house...where the term probably originated...And your entire AMD statement is just as I stated. Its a rather well known phrase too playing on the catchphrase of a popular chicken eatery.
According to your AMD statement an i3 2100 is better at EVERYTHING han a Phenom II X6 1100T........
Quote:
If you did do your homework you know that games do not take advantage of hyper-threading, so its pointless in a gaming rig. Due to various other issues with hyper-threading that I will not get into, because you can google on your own...I hope..., The i5 is better mostly due to the ability to overclock them.And BTW I suggest you do your homework i7's do show a slight FPS advanatage in some games therefore a broad statement like you made that the i5 is the STRONGEST gaming CPU is wrong
DarkOutlaw said:
That is correct, because your Alienware does not use integrated graphics. 9 times out of 10 people cannot afford an Alienware laptop (I know I can't) So I normally avoid the suggestion. And I could be mistaken, but All Alienware computers should come with an i7 + GPU, which is what my first suggestion is.Agreed (on not gaming with integrated video on a notebook). Good suggestion on the i7 + dedicated GPU, when affordable.
Related ressources:
- ForumIntel i3 2100 vs AMD A6 3650
- ForumI5 vs A6 question
- ForumWhich is better amd a6 or intel i3 for average use
- ForumAmd a6 apu vs fx4100 vs phenom 955 ?
- ForumIntel i5 2410 or AMD a6 3400m?? HELP!
- ForumAMD QUAD CORE A-6
- ForumLlano A4 vs A6 vs A8 (Noticeable Diff in Gaming?)
- ForumIs this compatible?
- ForumAMD 8120 or Intel 2500K
- ForumAMD vs. Intel CPU for Rendering/3d Graphics applications
- ForumIntel Core i5 3570k fan delay [video]
- ForumIntel Core i5 3570k Heatsink will not fit!
- ForumIntel i5/i7 vs AMD FX for 3D work
- ForumStuck multiplier on Intel socket 775 Q9550
- ForumIntel Pentium G
- More resources
!