Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > State of the Union

State of the Union

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - State of the Union

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

In 2003, it goes from Saddam having 25,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent, 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents, several mobile biological weapons labs, and an advanced nuclear weapons development program, to 2004 having "dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities." That's funny.

Oh, and getting rid of steroids in f ucking baseball is worthy to be in the state of the union? What the hell was that?

"You need to renew the Patriot Act." !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Baseball, but no mention of the need to fix the BCS? What a ripoff!

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698
- 0 +

hehe BCS is one of our WMD's !!!

<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface
- 0 +

Yeah it was a nearly a perfect speech. Not one booed or walked out. I even saw Hillary Clinton giving a standing ovation.

He's got my vote. He's the greatest President in the last 50 years. Even greater than Reagan or Nixon.
Democrats always hate the ones that are incredibly successful and revolutionary, you might remember the Reagan years if you are old enough.
They still cant stand Reagans legacy, apparant from the CBS special.
It was a great speech from a great man.
He commands your attention as a great speaker, thats apparant from all this attention we're giving the subject.

Now the New Hampshire debate, that was so very entertaining. I almost fell asleep those cronies were so boring.
They looked like zombies.
YAWN

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney

Quote :

He's the greatest President in the last 50 years.


Don't be silly. Ronald Reagan nearly single-handedly wiped communism from the face of the earth. The world owes Ronald Reagan a debt of gratitude. The cool-headedness of JFK prevented a nuclear war. If Nixon were president during the Cuban missile crisis a lot of us wouldn't be here right now.

If the Dems could actually put forth a decent candidate Bush would be gone. The best thing the GOP has going for it is a lack of decent Democrats to run.

Watch out for Edwards. He might just sneak in as the only possible Dem with enough charisma to keep people at the caucuses awake.

Okay, brain. You don't like me, and I don't like you, but let's get through this thing and then I can continue killing you with beer. -- Homer Simpson.

Reply to Black_Cat
- 0 +

You have to be sarcastic right?

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth
- 0 +

You're just jealous.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

Its not silly. Reagan didnt stop Qaddafi, Bush did.
Reagan did scare the [-peep-] out of him hiding in womans clothing.
Bush is one of the great humanitarians.
Clintons face did nothing but encourage the world to attack us.
JFK LOL, no better way to solidify your greatness than flame out really fast and die. Not saying he didnt do good for the time he did perform his duties.

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

I was going to ask you the same thing.
You post your opinion, I posted mine.
Big deal for you?

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

I dont know how all these facts stated can be sarcasm.

Quote :

Not one booed or walked out. I even saw Hillary Clinton giving a standing ovation.


FACT

Quote :

He's got my vote.



FACT

Quote :

He commands your attention as a great speaker, thats apparant from all this attention we're giving the subject.


FACT

Quote :

Now the New Hampshire debate, that was so very entertaining. I almost fell asleep those cronies were so boring.


FACT

I dont see how facts can be sarcastic in nature. :cool:

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney

It's kinda tradition not to boo or stand up and walk out at the SotUA. Pretty much everyone gives standing ovations. You forget to mention that she didn't look too happy while standing.

Ok, he can have your vote. He doesn't have mine, but either way it's not a comparison to anyone before or even if anyone thinks he's doing a good job because they could be voting for someone they think would do better.

He may command your attention as a great speaker, but I've heard better in school debate clubs. He makes me laugh. I'll give him that.

It didn't put me to sleep, but that's because I didn't watch it.

Reply to bandikoot
- 0 +

Listening would teach you more than laughing

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

Let your hate go. I know there is good within you!

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

It wasn't your "facts" I was questioning, it was your opinions.

Quote :

Yeah it was a nearly a perfect speech.



I thought it was a terrible speech.

Quote :

He's the greatest President in the last 50 years. Even greater than Reagan or Nixon.



That's just, wow, a stunning statement if you believe it.

Quote :

It was a great speech from a great man.



Again, wow.

Quote :

He commands your attention as a great speaker



Bush is one of the most ineloquent speakers I've ever heard.

Quote :

They looked like zombies.



And Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, and Cheney are all stallions...

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth
- 0 +

Jealous of whom, and for what exactly?

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth
- 0 +

yhgtbfk me. bush is a joke, so is this administration and we look like jackass's to the rest of the world.

bush commands nobody's attention he is atrocious at speaking publically, which btw is the reason he has given the fewest press conferences of any elected president in the last 50 years. all ?s asked at a bush press conference are prescreened so the president knows exactly what will be asked and have an answer prepared. only those who submitted questions ahead of time get to "ask" the president a question.

have you forgot all the bushims that he is responsible for?

reagen wasn't even running the country for most of his second term as his alhiemers had set in, bush 1 was. that was common knowledge.

it was such a perfect spech that i believe nearly 10 percent less people watched this year than last.

enjoy the last days of bush as he will be leaving sooner than you think

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

Quote :

Don't be silly. Ronald Reagan nearly single-handedly wiped communism from the face of the earth



the fall of communism was inevitable, only a matter of time. reagen may have expedited it's demise but the people who lived in the countries where communism failed and fell were as much responsible for the fall as anyone else.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal

My brain is HT enabled. I can laugh and listen at the same time.

Reply to bandikoot
- 0 +

Quote :

Clintons face did nothing but encourage the world to attack us.


right that is exactly why the terrorists waited until after clinton was out of office to launch their big devastating attack against the united states, coincidentally after bush assumed the presidency.

for the most part the years under clinton were some of the most profitable seen by americans in recent times. he was able to balance the budget and actually produce a surplus, something the last three republican presidents strangly have not even come close to accomplishing.

Quote :

Bush is one of the great humanitarians


you are definately correct about this one. bush lets see invaded 2 countries is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people needlessly as a result both american and foreign. he has been nice enough to house 600 foreign nationals in cuba without legal council, rights, any clue as to when and if they will be charged with anything, and certainly no time frame as to when they will be allowed to leave. so many of them liked it so much, 14 of them have committed suicide.

lets not forget bush's humanitarian efforts here in the us. he pledges that no child will be left behind and then renegs on the funding. he has certainly been a humanitarian to his friends in big business making sure their ceos will be able to buy the new yachts and other extravagent lavish lifestyles items they so need all the while 3 million people have lost their jobs because of his humanitarianism. also it sure is nice of bush to spend 170 billion dollars on the military as they certainly did need it to fight their "war on terror" when people in this country are starving, dying, going jobless, remaining homeless, not getting the education that bush demanded or promised.

bush has single handidly managed to piss off the entire world against save britain and japan. he was so kind to send american soldiers into afghanistan and iraq and then telling the terrorists to "bring it on" meanwhile cutting benefits and pay for the soldiers involved in "defending the united states against weaklings who as it has been proven couldn't of attacked a fly much less a country 8000 miles away"

you are right bush is definately a humanitarian, ranks right up there with mother theresa, pope john paul II, winston churchill and jesus christ.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by jmycal on 01/23/04 01:53 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

OOOOOOOoooooooooooooWWeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If I ever need a spindoctor I'm hiring you!

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

all of what i said is the truth. with the exception of why the terrorists decided to attact when they did, but they did not attack america directly until bush was in office.

seriously what the hell has bush done that is can even remotely be considered humanitarian?

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

As far as being a speaker, he has improved 200% since he got into office.
Hate him, kill all of us conservatives... but that is so very true, any way you slice it.
He gives very good speeches, he never used too, but he does now.
Taking that away shows your bias.

As far as being the best President in 50 years, it is true.
You are clouded by hate like every other clown in this nation (if you're even American). But trust me hes a President of principle and action.
I'm amazed at the ignorance displayed by some of the posters here, 9/11 would have never happened if not for Clintons INACTION.
Its called preventive measures and using your intelligence information wisely. Prez Clit (fitting dont you think) just wanted to get-by.

You can thank your commander in chief of the military and thousands of soldiers for maintaining your freedom.
This is real life you spineless liberals, people f*ckin hate America.
They want us dead. They will kill us all if we let them get the power too someday.
Removing Saddam also happens to have been one of the great humanitarian efforts of the last 50 years.

If you're going to sit there and tell me that making Hitler blow his face off wasnt a humanitarian deed... um f*ck off.

You liberals are all the same but thats why we have 2 parties and not just 1.
We are here to take care of things that are important like the economy (which Bush has fixed and Clinton had effectively destroyed by the end of his term), and maintaining freedom.
Bush has you beat on security, economy and domestic issues.
There is no reason to change and people wont during a time of war.

It seems funny that liberal people are almost always severely uneducated.
No Child Left Behind will fix that.
If I have to break it down for you la-la land liberals..
We are fighting the terrorists in the streets of Tikrit and Basra instead of New York and Washington.
Taking the fight to the terrorists and those who harbor them (Saddam) was what we HAD TO DO unless your a f*cking idiot... seriously.
On 9/11, the average person would say that it would be impossible to not have another terror attack for the NEXT TWO YEARS.
Bush has accomplished this, among many, many many more great things that will go down in history.
He's done more in 3 years than ANY of your liberal do-nothing socialist f*cks that have been elected have done in 2 terms.

You'll be seeing him in another term, I assure you. I'm going to be on the streets, on the phones and giving large amounts of money to ensure we kick your ass.

If you believe in democracy, you should respect him as your publicly elected leader.. if you cant do that like most good Americans do, he is the most power man in the world.
Hate him as you might, he is the man.
The rest of the world sees we finally got a leader who loves his nation.
Of course half the world doesnt like him, he tells the UN that they are the useless bunch of inactive boobs that they are... he puts Saddam in a cage (who tried to assasinate former President Bush), made Qaddafi [-peep-] his pants and give up all WMD plans/programs UNCONDITIONALLY..
Instead of sell us out.

Believe me, I have much more conviction (a conservative trait) than you or any other liberal on this board.
I will be getting this President elected with every other like minded individual, this is the most important time for an election in many years.

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

200 % isn't that good of an improvement considering most eigth graders could and still do speak better than he does. he is illiterate and can not read a teleprompter, once again why the president doesn't speak very often in public.


Quote :

You are clouded by hate like every other clown in this nation (if you're even American). But trust me hes a President of principle and action.
I'm amazed at the ignorance displayed by some of the posters here, 9/11 would have never happened if not for Clintons INACTION.
Its called preventive measures and using your intelligence information wisely. Prez Clit (fitting dont you think) just wanted to get-by.


the clinton administration prepared an in depth report on the growing problem with al-quaeda and presented it to the new administration after the bombing of the uss cole

<A HREF="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/001120" target="_new">http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/001120</A>
<b>

Quote :

Would things be any different had Gore been President? Wouldn’t 9-11 have still happened?

Perhaps not, according to mainstream media source Time Magazine. In their article, They Had A Plan [requires paid subscription], they explain why: After the bombing of the USS Cole the Clinton Administration had drawn up a comprehensive plan for fighting Al-Qaeda. But they didn’t want to execute it with a new President taking office in a few months, so they briefed Bush’s team at the highest levels and told them how important it was that they carry it out. And then Bush did nothing.


</b>

from Time magazine
<A HREF="http://www.newsfilter.org/articles/timesfishstory.htm" target="_new">http://www.newsfilter.org/articles/timesfishstory.htm</A>

<b>

Quote :

Time Magazine broke a story on August 4th which claimed that the Clinton administration was ready to go to war with Afghanistan and al-Queda over the Oct. 12, 2000 USS Cole bombing. But you see Bush was about to take over and:

"With less than a month left in office, they did not think it appropriate to launch a major initiative against Osama bin Laden. "We would be handing [the Bush Administration] a war when they took office on Jan. 20," says a former senior Clinton aide. "That wasn't going to happen."
</b>


Quote :

<b>You can thank your commander in chief of the military and thousands of soldiers for maintaining your freedom.
This is real life you spineless liberals, people f*ckin hate America.</b>
They want us dead. They will kill us all if we let them get the power too someday.
It also happens to have been one of the great humanitarian efforts of the last 50 years.



the freedom of the american people was never not at any time in jeopardy, it still isn't. if you honestly believe that then i believe you need wake up and smell the coffee. iraq never was going to attack america or be able to attack america in anyway shape or form.

as for being a spineless liberal bastard i suggest you think twice before calling people spineless. i and other liberal thinking people have the balls to stand up for what is right in this country, unlike some other right wing fascist stoodges and minions who currently run this country. <b>Spineless are all the people in this country who blindly accept what this administration is doing. spineless are the people who pick on people who can't defend themselves. spineless are the people like you who support this fascist crap.</b>


Quote :

We are here to take care of things that are important like the economy (which Bush has fixed and Clinton had effectively destroyed by the end of his term), and maintaining freedom.


did you even pay attention during the 90's. lets see clinton entered office with a deficit and turned it into the biggest surplus by balancing the budget and spending money with in their means. <b>unlike the past 2 republican presidents and george bush who haven't even come close to balancing a budget. bush took the biggest surplus in the history of the country and turned it into a 450 billion dollar deficit. </b>

Quote :

Bush has you beat on security, economy and domestic issues.
There is no reason to change and people wont during a time of war


last time i checked bush's domestic and economic policies leave much to be desired, who are you getting your information from www.bushalmighty.com, ? his policies are a joke and will continue to be a joke. So far every child has been left behind because schools have no money to implement everything that has been required by bush and his economic policy is even more of a joke.

Quote :

It seems funny that liberal people are almost always severely uneducated.
No Child Left Behind will fix that.
If I have to break it down for you la-la land liberals..
We are fighting the terrorists in the streets of Tikrit and Basra instead of New York and Washington.
Taking the fight to the terrorists and those who harbor them (Saddam) was what we HAD TO DO unless your a f*cking idiot... seriously.
On 9/11, the average person would say that it would be impossible to not have another terror attack for the NEXT TWO YEARS.
Bush has accomplished this, among many, many many more great things that will go down in history.
He's done more in 3 years than ANY of your liberal do-nothing socialist f*cks that have been elected have done in 2 terms.


let me break it down for you since you obviously can’t even comprehend simple concepts. Our children are the future. Btw I am a well educated person and fairly intelligent as well. We are fighting a war we will not win. Terrorism always has been and always will be around. It isn’t going anyway. Besides we still haven’t located osama bin laden yet. For every terrorist rounded up, killed, etc, there are 10 more waiting to wage a war the us has perpetrated for the sole purpose as a means of existence. <b>Funny before bush came along no one ever attacked the united states directly (save japan wwii). So the fact that there hasn’t been another attack since is par for the course. Bush has had nothing to do with the safety of the us, as is was before. He has put the lives of Americans in danger now more than ever making Americans the targets of the people who hate us even more now. Violence begets violence and the only thing bush is doing is inflaming the terrorists. It is all a set. Bush has certainly accomplished many things that will go down in history. It will be known as the darkest days of the us and the person who took us to the bottom. Clinton was very diplomatic in his approach while bush is a rough em tough shoot em up cowboy with no means for diplomacy or anything that does not agree with his goals.

Quote :

If you believe in democracy, you should respect him as your publicly elected leader.. if you cant do that like most good Americans do, he is the most power man in the world.
Hate him as you might, he is the man.
The rest of the world sees we finally got a leader who loves his nation.
Of course half the world doesnt like him, he tells the UN that they are the useless bunch of inactive boobs that they are... he puts Saddam in a cage (who tried to assasinate former President Bush), made Qaddafi [-peep-] his pants and give up all WMD plans/programs UNCONDITIONALLY..
Instead of sell us out.

Believe me, I have much more conviction (a conservative trait) than you or any other liberal on this board.
I will be getting this President elected with every other like minded individual, this is the most important time for an election in many years.



<b>he is not my publicly elected leader. The public elected Al Gore president of the united states. The supreme court gave the presidency to george bush. The same supreme court that had no constitutional authority to decide the outcome in a presidential race. </b>the rest of the world sees george bush as a spoiled little bully. They also see him as someone who is intolerant, ignorant, stupid, goofy, dumb, I could go on but you get the picture. Trust me you will still be in the minority this election like the last election and unlike this election bush will lose.


<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

Step back man. You're only seeing what you want to see. Let your hate go.

You are so adament about bitching about ANYTHING republican, ANYTHING Bush, that it's ridiculous.

Under Clinton people lost more money than anything in recent history, save the depression. The bubble burst before Bush. The recesion started before Bush. Even I wouldn't blame Clinton exclusively for that though. Somehow the economy is showing signs of massive recovery though. The only soft figure is jobs but that is because productivity has increased dramatically. Once they balance out we'll be ok.

Reagan should be given a good portion of the credit for the downfall of the USSR. Their uranium stockpiles far exceded ours and they were spending trillions to keep up with the arms race. It broke them. This wasn't because of Carter. Yes, communism itself breaks communism, but the downfall of the USSR should be attributed to the fact that they could not afford to go on and they could not afford to control their population any longer.

You go ahead and vote for the yodeller and wart man, but I think you're so blind with meaningless hatred that it's not even funny. Do what I do and make a list of the good and the bad. Be honest and objective.

I'm not sure how many times I have to keep repeating myself to you, but you really need to come to grips with the fact that the WMD in Iraq were documented by sources outside of the USA including the UN and it was Iraq's responsability to cooperate by disclosing them and destroying them. He didn't and that's why we went to war. In the case of Afghanistan they refused to hand over Bin Laden and that is why we went to war. How hard is that for you to understand? The world is a better place with both of those countries not being ruled by their regimes.

I'm so sick of the bitching and moaning. Let's hear something constructive for once.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

i will let go of my distate for this admistration when they are gone, never to return.

i wasn't planning on voting for dean actually. i still like john edwards who happens to be a very polished trial attorney, and i think the one person who could defeat bush. very centrist and charasmatic, and from the south.

i am being objective when i say bush has done more harm than good. some see it, others don't, and others don't care.

we do indeed live in dangerous times may we see our way through them to a time less threatening. think about the governments use of fear. say what you will about michael moore but columbine had a valid point about fear. fear and wonder 2 very powerful tools



<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

Dangerous times?

The problem I see here is that you will complain about Bush's policies no matter what. If we have an attack tommorrow you will claim that he made us no safer. If we didn't go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan you would claim that he made us no safer.

What do you want for safety?

You aren't being objective. No objective person could possibly complain this much.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

The worst part is the hypocracy. Edwards has less experience than Bush did entering office yet you endorse him and critisized Bush for no experience. How can you, of all people, possibly endorse a candidate who supported us going to war in Iraq?

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

He even supports the Patriot act. I don't see it dude, what is it that you like?

I see a lot of stuff that I like about him, but I don't see anything that you would like.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke

Anybody ever post pics of that MiG found buried in the sand out there?

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698
- 0 +

Bush still says stupid things all the time. It is true that he isn't nearly as bad now as he was when he first took office, but he still is not a well-spoken man. He gives a lot of speeches, which is really hard to mess up, but when he's put on the spot he constantly fumbles over himself, and sounds stupid because of it. That's why you rarely see him giving press conferences that aren't scripted.

Saying he is the best president in 50 years is not a fact, it is an opinion. In your opinion, he is the best, and in my opinion, he is the worst.

I find it funny that you say I am clouded by hate, then go on to say such things as "spineless liberals," "la-la land liberals," and "liberal do-nothing socialist f*cks."

What exactly are Bush's principles? His principles seem to be caving to special interests and looking out for the rich and powerful rather than the average American. His principles seem to be lying to the American people in order to start an expensive war at a time we can't afford it, for who knows what end.

The problem with you is that you make your statements based only on speculation, and back them up with no evidence or facts. 9/11 should have been prevented by the intelligence systems that were already in place. For some reason there was a massive failure that let the terrorists pre-9/11 actions go unchecked. It is simply false to blame Clinton. Personally, I blame the terrorists.

I personally don't feel like this administration is maintaining my freedom. How exactly is invading Iraq protecting my freedom. If anything, the USA PATRIOT Act is more of a threat to American's freedoms and liberties than Saddam Hussein ever was. I, along with 99% of Americans, both liberals and conservatives, agreed with going into Afghanistan because that is where the evidence led us to. That is where the fight belongs, not in Iraq.

I know people hate America. But you have to ask the question, why do they hate America? Islamic fundamentalists are f ucking crazy, and the US constantly sticking it's nose into the middle-east's business is what fuels that hate and insanity. Bush's explaination that they hate us because of our freedoms is just laughable, and when he spouts crap like that he keeps losing more and more points.

To seriously compare Saddam with Hitler is extremely inappropriate. Saddam is a bully compared to Hitler. Hitler posed a threat to not only the United States, but to the entire world, which was obvious. Saddam was relatively contained and posed no immediate threat to us. There's a big difference there bub.

We have two parties because of our ridiculous constiutional system. If we were like most modern democracies, we'd have more. That's why I have a problem with the liberal/conservative only labels, as I am really neither. If anything I'd consider myself a Libertarian, as I'm sure so would a lot of other people.

To say Bush has fixed the economy is ridiculous. The economy is improving, yes, but it still needs to get a lot better before it can be considered fixed. What is really sad is that you say, and apparantly believe, Clinton destroyed the economy. 8 years he was in office, and improvement was made through practically the entire 2 terms. 22 million jobs were created, and the budget was balanced with a plan presented that would eliminate the national debt in 10 years. The Bush administration has given us a $500 billion or so defecit, with a debt that will only get larger and not smaller.

How can you agree with this administration when they slash taxes (to the rich, mind you) but increase spending more than any other administration? That is not the action of a conservative administration.

I do not feel the Bush administration has been dealing with security properly. Nearly every amendment in the Bill of Rights has been given "exceptions" with the USA PATRIOT Act, except the second amendment. Terrorists can still buy all the guns in the US that they want, but because Ashcroft is a lifetime NRA member who won't do anything to let law enforcement do "whatever it takes" to prevent terrorists from getting guns. That tells me that this administration is not serious about security.

No Child Left Behind will not fix our education problems. Do you only think it will because of the promising name? Have you read what the program does? Probably not, and even if you did you would still blindly follow your leader...

I agree with taking the fight to the terrorists. That's what we did in Afghanistan. But, Bush made a mistake in going to Iraq because it thinned out the troops in Afghanistan and drew resources away from the people who were behind 9/11. I don't know if you realize this, but Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. Just because Dick Cheney keeps repeating it, only to be corrected by both Bush and Powell, doesn't mean it is true.

To say that the Bush policies have stopped terrorism is inaccurate. The administration has not come up with any arrests or charges filed against anyone since 9/11, showing they are doing their jobs in preventing another attack. It took the terrorists 8 years to strike the World Trade Center again after they first attacked, so to say anything after only 2 years is premature.

Please, tell me, what are the "many, many many more" great things Bush has done that will go down in history? Becuase for the life of me I can't think of any...

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth
- 0 +

afghanistan i didn't have a problem with. how is america any safer having invaded iraq? we did some good but we also did some very bad things along the way.

many senators and congressmen and women supported the patriot act, edwards happened to be one of them. i should take an in-depth look at edwards and kerry. i believe those 2 will be the front runners for the nomination.

lets take this analogy and apply it to terror and safety.

you have a rope tied around your leg and you need to get the rope off. first you think you will try and pull the rope to try to get it to come off, but not avail, the rope is not tighter around your leg. so you figure you will pull harder and the only thing that happens is the rope becomes tighter. finally you try letting up on the pressure and cutting some slack and the rope slides off.

the harder you try to control something the worse it is going to get. there are many things that we can do to combat terrorism such as backing off support for israel and support the palenstians right to a country. quite pissing off terrorist groups. treat other people better.


<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

Thats why I havent been responding to him. Hes a moron.

Hes a centrist my ass. There hasnt been a more centrist republican than Bush in a long time. He's arguing the typical old hat(e) anthems that liberals spew.
That is why me and my conservative comrades are taking over this whole damn country. People are sick of that attitude they put on.

I dont see a real centrist having so much hatred for Bush or his policies.
Bush isnt very 'conservative'.. which is why I feel so strongly about his success and throw my support behind him.

Theres many stupid people in our country, you are a voice of reason DH.

I would show him why everything he says is not only untrue but not logical.. but seriously, that guy needs to get educated.
That would be his best bet in comprehending the state of affairs in this nation.

As far as being positive, I find it funny the original post was negative... then I put a positive light on Bush for a change around here and all these oddballs jump on me.
As I said above, they stated their piece.. and I presented my view.
Is that really a problem?
Yes, it is for the modern liberal American.
Thats why everyone knows about the biased "liberal media".
They dont me speaking my view because they are hateful people.

I'm being as nice as I possibly can while excusing all the ignorance!

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

Quote :

The worst part is the hypocracy. Edwards has less experience than Bush did entering office yet you endorse him and critisized Bush for no experience. How can you, of all people, possibly endorse a candidate who supported us going to war in Iraq?



*cough*MORONS*cough*

Thats just a very small part and example of the hypocrisy these types put out.
Its a lack of common sense and being uneducated.. or just a twisted f*ck.
If you want to know my view, which obviously is much more interesting to these silly kids than the original post or anything anyone else has posted... the problem is that the Democrats HAVE NO PLAN. In my years, I've witnessed them actually do very little at all when in office.
Unless it involves homosexuals, minoritys or selling out our nations confidential information.
Once the conservatives fix the economy AGAIN, and secure our freedoms... they might fool the public into pretending that those issues are more important than ensuring we still have a nation to live in.
Oh, and forgot to mention... Bush actually has taken their previously strong issues.. while maintaining his conservative base.
Brilliant.

Their plan always consists of opposing whatever initiatives the Republicans put out.
Bush supports the temporary worker program, something I believe in and something a liberal would usually support but no.

I havent figured the "hate America" crowd out yet.
Once Democrats disengage from the radical politics of the 60s in which they so embraced and become more centrist I will vote for one.

If the Deans/Kerrys/Kucinichs/Edwards are the platform standard bearers, no way.
Lieberman? I would strongly consider voting for against any Republican besides Bush.

Ask these clowns what Republican they would vote for LOL
Seriously they are so closed minded they wouldnt even consider that idea.

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

i never said i was a centrist i am a liberal very liberal. bush is teetering on fascism. he certainly doesn't fit the profile of what i understand a conservative to be. conversatives are for small government. leaving other people alone, not spending money, cutting taxes. bush is big business, cut taxes spend money galore, bush has increased the size of the federal government more than any other president and during the last election bush said the he would not engage in nation building which is what is doing, or attempting to do in 2 different countries.

liberals don't spew hate, at least no more than conservatitives spew. yes people are sick of conservatives attempting to take over the country you will be shown the door quite shortly. don't let the door hit you on your a$$ on the way out.

there is nothing positive that you can say about bush with the exception that he is resigning from office.

there is no liberal media bias it is a conservative fallacy to fool people into thinking there is one. the media is very much biased, towards money.

i don't have any problems with people voicing their opinions, but if you voice your opinion than you must be prepared to accept what happens as a result.

<font color=purple><b><i>The Principle's of the Lust are easy to understand. Do what feel, feel until the end</b></i></font color=purple>

Reply to jmycal
- 0 +

I think McCain would have made a much better president than Bush... I don't dislike Bush because he's a Republican, I dislike him because I feel that not only are his policies taking this country in the wrong direction, they are downright damaging.

I have serious problems with a $500 billion defecit. Don't you? Do you think it is okay? I could undertand a defecit, from what happened on 9/11, the economic downturn, and going to Afghanistan. But, the defecit was made far worse because of irresponsible tax cuts and the war in Iraq. I think it's very bad that our leaders act so wrecklessly.

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth
- 0 +

You can go ahead and stop supporting the ONLY democratic country in the region. You can go ahead and support the Palestinians, a group whose government:

1. Hijacked and blew up planes throughout the 70's.
2. Hijacked and murdered an American on a cruiseliner
3. Hijacked and murdered members of the jewish olmpic team.
4. Started multiple wars with Israel.
5. Worked with foreign governments to destory Israel.
6. Refuses to stop terrorism since they don't want a civil war.
7. Refuses to crack down on people who strap bombs to themselves and blow up innocent people. The latest suicide bomber was a woman who claimed that she had metal pins in her body. When the guards showed pity she blew them up.
8. Imports large caches of weapons to be used against Israel despite claiming to be for peace.
9. Who's moto is to destroy Israel. Arafat still holds speaches claiming that the Palestinians will regain Jerusalem.


It's a damn shame about both people. I've met Jews and Palestinians and they are nice people. Unfortionately Arafat refuses to make peace and the Israelis respond in kind by electing Sharon. Nonetheless, it's impossible to support people that's entire existance revolves around hate.

You're a pesimist. If you start looking at things from a possitive light you might be surprised what you find. Until then don't suggest that we should abondon the only democratic nation in the region for one that supports and adopts terrorism as thier means to get what they want.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

You're not liberal. Don't even claim to be liberal. You're approaching communist or marxist. You're way beyond liberal.

I can say that I am liberal since I believe in most of the liberal values. I've been voting republican in the last couple of elections but that is because the democrats have no plan, no vision, and all they do is bitch and try to say anything to please everybody. I don't respect that. I respect someone who says what he means and then does it. Bush has done that. He's not perfect but he's leagues ahead of Gore. We'll see who runs against him. I also don't believe in the liberal way of spending money and redistribution of wealth. I forget which candidate it was, but one was campaigning to tax everyone more who earns 60K or more. I hate to break the news but that's bullshit and I already pay enough taxes. It's not my job to support everyone else. I also don't believe that taxing those that are successfull more is fair. If a successfull person wants to give money away let him do so by his own free will. The McDonald's 1.5B contribution to the Salvation Army and Bill Gate's donations are fine examples. This idea that we should tax the rich and support the poor is ridiculous. I am all for increasing spending for education instead. Let them take all the money they spend on non-disability welfare and put it into education. Put welfare recipients back in school and make our workforce stronger by education.

As far as the USA treating people better, I don't know of any nation that gives more to others than the USA. Maybe we should cut off all foreign aid and funnel it into our education and healthcare? Maybe you're suggesting that we stop doing things that benefit our nation and our national interests? The USA is here for us, not for our enemies. We don't have to bend for any 13th century idiots. I'd be more than happy to support any initiative that would motivate those less privledged people across the globe to stand up to their repressive regimes but there's only so much that people can do when they're under an iron claw.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

nicely said my friend nicely said

<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface

Yep...

But....so much seriousness and emotion on a Friday night. I should have worked harder to de-rail this thread sooner. Like the cheney one. :evil:

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698
- 0 +

I'me working an 11 hour day today...ALONE. Yesterday was the same.

I need all the conversation I can get.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

Thank you

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

thats it dude?

i worked from 2230-0730 yesterday(to today) and then from 0930-1630 today. hehe me tired.

<A HREF="http://www.cameronwilliamson.com" target="_new">-={Apostalic Alcoholic.}=-</A>

Reply to mrface
- 0 +

Well, I have commute time too. Add in time for showering, eating, and sleeping, and I'm left with about an hour a day for myself.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
- 0 +

I give you credit for at least saying what you are, being liberal.
I can respect that as its not deceptive.

Quote :

iberals don't spew hate, at least no more than conservatitives spew. yes people are sick of conservatives attempting to take over the country you will be shown the door quite shortly.



That first sentence, I strongly disagree with. We are the 'silent majority'. Theres anger on both sides, but the anger on the liberal side has turned into hatred and self destruction.
Thats opinion, and unarguable but I think most would agree generally.

The second part, people arent sick of us taking over the country, because we've been doing very good.
Not in a liberal point of view but for the centrists (the swing vote and the majority) we are doing great.
I'm actually not hardline conservative.
I'm fiscally conservative and socially liberal.

My politics fall in line with Arnold Swartzenegger, George Bush, and Joe Lieberman.
As you and everyone knows, the demos dont exactly like what they used to be.. which is clearly represented by Lieberman.
That, is a good American that I would vote for anyday with a true heart and reasonable mind. All 3 of those men fall into that opinion for me.

I'm not ridiculing you, but try to be more openminded. You seem to have nothing positive to say about Bush and thats just too much bias or hatred.

It certainly wont win you any popularity contests, much as it hasnt worked for your liberal friends trying to get in office.
I have NO PROBLEM with democrats but the uber-liberal ones, who border on outright overthrow of our system and constitution (which you stated you dont support) is what burns me and I feel its the greatest threat to our nation.
The threat from within.

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

I commend you ksoth you seem much more level headed than the others around here, at least those on the 'other' side.

I agree with you on the spending, Bush isnt very "conservative" in that sense.
Does that concern me? Yes.

Heres my reasoning on it. You already know I think hes a great leader and has a great administration made up of the best people ever to grace our nations capital with years (and I mean some with 30 years of Presidential assistance) of qualifications.

I think that with what he's doing overall, the economy will not only boom (as it is now) but it will get much better, enough that it will offset any increased spending. The tax cuts and Greenspan keeping interest rates low are directly related to our economic rebound.
I think most of what hes doing is basically necessary to gain back American consumer and investor confidence and general populace faith in the entire government again.

Also, I realize that with a liberal President, the spending would be just as free flowing.
Furthermore, he (if anyone) has a perfect excuse for the spending, 9/11 and the recession that he fixed through his measures and tax cuts.

Another, maybe unrelated thing about the deficit is.. I'm plain tired of hearing about it because NO politicians have ever entirely gotten rid of it.
And who had the chance to easily? Clinton. He was in charge in the boom years, the tech boom, the internet.. ect. Seriously, if anyone is guilty of not taking care of it at the opportune time it was him.
So I dont fault Bush for those things very much.

Thats my perspective.. I'm sure its much different from the way you see things but I hope you can at least understand my POV.
I have no loyalties but to my values, if the Democrats go back in time a bit on their platform, yet still progressive (Lieberman again) I'd strongly consider switching or at least stop doing straight ticket votes.

I will share my two main values that shape my thought on government because you seem to have a much better attitude than your compatriots.
1. I believe that I know how to better spend my money than the government does.
2. I believe in states rights.

Does this blend with Bush completely? No. Thats just my general outline and what drives me.
For reasons above I excuse Bush from my typical conservatism.

OOOooo Hannity and Combs is on, time to go. I'm a Sean Hannity fan.
I welcome further talk or debate with you.

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney
- 0 +

Wow, excellent post.
I think I've found my soulmate :wink:

No really, you share many many of my thoughts exactly.


Quote :

I am all for increasing spending for education instead.


YES

Quote :

I respect someone who says what he means and then does it. Bush has done that.


YES

Quote :

I also don't believe that taxing those that are successfull more is fair.


Exactly, a flat tax does force those who earn more to pay more in.
Because they can afford it.
Thats the beauty of percentages. :cool:

Quote :

As far as the USA treating people better, I don't know of any nation that gives more to others than the USA.


I hear you and agree but I think your preaching to the trees.

Quote :

This idea that we should tax the rich and support the poor is ridiculous.


Socialism anyone?

Quote :

If a successfull person wants to give money away let him do so by his own free will.


YES, it is a SOCIAL problem not a BIG GOVERNMENT problem.
My idea was to implement "encouragement" programs to donate large amounts of money to charities and those in need.
I dont have specifics but we could certainly encourage charity and goodwill without the ill-will that comes along with TAKING someones money and GIVING it to another.
"Encouragement" programs could go that way possibly. But the current Robin Hood method is bad for the nations psyche, and discourages competition (why work when the rewards are negated??).

Though education and more emphasis on values in our nation.. either faithbased or not we can fix the declining state of our nations attitude.

See, I believe in the system, our republic. I think that the truth will always rise to the top. Therefore I ALWAYS try very hard to support WHOEVER is elected. It is my President and I stand behind him as hes been chosen by us the people through our populace and electorial system.
I am a true believer and patriot.

Its a sacred right to elect our officials, its our DUTY to keep up in politics and vote.. just as its our DUTY to protect our people as Bush is doing. Its also our duty to not run when called upon by your nation like Clinton.

There are other great nations out there, Britain, Australia, Japan and the other 57 nations that unilaterally assisted us in this war on terror.
I wait for the day I get some money and travel to Britain and get to shake the hands of those citizens.

Blair (a liberal) and the conservative party are right beside us just as the great Winston Churchill wanted his nation to do post WW2.
Enough ass kissing, :smile: I just feel a great brotherhood with the Brits (as I've stated before I'm a strong supporter of Anglo-American relations and I'm anti UN/EU until they shape up).

----
Yeah, thats right. I support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.

Reply to kinney

That's it? I expected more. Now I'm disappointed.

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698
- 0 +

20 minutes left. I can't wait to go home. I have 4 episodes of 24 that I downloaded to watch.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke

In a row? Wow.

Just watched American Wedding. Fockin' funny.

<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>

Reply to Auburn9698
- 0 +

Great movies!

Stiffler makes those movies though.

_________________________________________
<font color=red><b>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red></b>

Reply to dhlucke
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > State of the Union
Go to:

There are 1033 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 bew1075k won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Parasitic won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 X3no won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Siq won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 wayspooled won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 chris62 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Tattysnuc won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 gamerk316 won the Freshman badge
  • 05:23 jsc won the Overclocking badge
  • 01:00 rolli59 won the Spy badge