Hi All,
I'm looking at building a new system from what I currently have which is an Intel C2D 6850. I don't play games on it and will probably not install my Nvidia 9600GT in my new build (unless something comes out that I want to play). I mostly video encode and just use it for browsing. I think I'm looking at either a FX 6100 or a Ivy Bridge 3570k so I can get the $50 off the motherboard at Microcenter. I remember reading that per core the Intel is superior over the FX 6100. As I am encoding though and hopefully apps like Handbrake will take advantage of all of the cores, would it be worthwhile to get the AMD instead of the Intel. Keep in mind there is about $100 difference between the AMD and Intel.
I'm happy with my SSD drive that I currently have and think that my current setup is great, just that encoding video takes forever and since I have a Nvidia chipset on my current MB, I've lost dual channel DDR and not sure when this board is going to eventually go.
I'm looking at building a new system from what I currently have which is an Intel C2D 6850. I don't play games on it and will probably not install my Nvidia 9600GT in my new build (unless something comes out that I want to play). I mostly video encode and just use it for browsing. I think I'm looking at either a FX 6100 or a Ivy Bridge 3570k so I can get the $50 off the motherboard at Microcenter. I remember reading that per core the Intel is superior over the FX 6100. As I am encoding though and hopefully apps like Handbrake will take advantage of all of the cores, would it be worthwhile to get the AMD instead of the Intel. Keep in mind there is about $100 difference between the AMD and Intel.
I'm happy with my SSD drive that I currently have and think that my current setup is great, just that encoding video takes forever and since I have a Nvidia chipset on my current MB, I've lost dual channel DDR and not sure when this board is going to eventually go.