Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Is Intel Core i3-2120 better than FX 4100 and phenom II x4 965?

Last response: in CPUs
Share

yes, the i3 2120 is much better for gaming. because games usually don't effectively use more than 2 cores, having 2 faster cores would be much better than having 4 slower cores. the 2120 and 965 perform exactly the same overall, while at the same time the 2120 has 2 less cores, making it twice as fast. the 4100 however is slower than the two slightly.

to wrap it all up, get that 2120. if you get a 1155 motherboard you are also much more future friendly.

keep in mind that the ivy bridge core i3s were just released. you can get a 3.3GHz ivy bridge i3 for the same price using the promo code here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168... there is free shipping too. make sure your motherboard supports it first.

marshal11 said:
yes, the i3 2120 is much better for gaming. because games usually don't effectively use more than 2 cores, having 2 faster cores would be much better than having 4 slower cores. the 2120 and 965 perform exactly the same overall, while at the same time the 2120 has 2 less cores, making it twice as fast. the 4100 however is slower than the two slightly.

to wrap it all up, get that 2120. if you get a 1155 motherboard you are also much more future friendly.

keep in mind that the ivy bridge core i3s were just released. you can get a 3.3GHz ivy bridge i3 for the same price using the promo code here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168... there is free shipping too. make sure your motherboard supports it first.


You are totally wrong :non:  FX Bulldozer Chips are based on Zambezi Technology which were hardly meant to show their true performance on Previous version of windows. Since the time Windows 8 have released. See this, http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_lookup.php?cpu=AMD+FX-4...

FX-4100 Is better than Core i5 760, Core i3 2120/2125/2130

Thumbs up for FX Processors :sol: 
Related ressources

AMD flopped big tie with bulldozer. Bulldozer is like intels pentium 4 high clock speeds and in 2012 amd have lots of cores added to make it like wow high clock speed and lots of cores for low price when reality is 2 core intel cpu's out perform amd 4 core and intel take half the electricity. intel 4 core outperform amd 8 core and take half electricity. Quite funny how dominant intel are in terms of technology. Put it this way if by 2014 amd have similar performance per watt to what intel have now it willl be a miracle. In fact if they get there by 2015 it will still be a miravle to what intel have now in 2012 or had in 2011.

the i3 is better than most amd processors avaible on the public market, only when overclocked heavily over 5gigahertz plus might be close or equal to the i3 in gaming.

but thats doesnt include higher energy consumption+better cooling setup etc.

at stock the i3 is the way to go.

!