Question about Integrated Sound

tetrakarbon

Distinguished
Apr 20, 2006
4
0
18,510
I have a question about the relative virtues of the following CODEC's I often see on motherboards. I'm upgrading from an nForce2 board, so I'm not sure how far a step down new audio solutions will be. The integrated solutions I'm seeing are Realtek ALC850 and ALC882D, as well as ADI AD1986A. On some DFI boards, they have Karajan sound - but that seems to just be based on the ALC850?

Any advice? I was leaning towards buying a Asus A8R-MVP, until I noticed that it has the same sound solution as some pretty low end boards...

Thanks very much in advance!

-- Ned Ruggeri
 

moparman390

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2006
206
0
18,680
There is only one board with good onboard audio, the MSI K8N Diamond Plus. It has SB Audigy SE built in. I have this board, great board, but it's like $200. I think the best thing for you to do is get an Audigy SE, the jump from onboard audio to is is huge and only costs like $30. The jump from Audigy SE to X-Fi is much smaller and the X-Fi is another $100 over the price of the Audigy SE.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16829102003
 

DaveUK

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2006
383
0
18,790
Why do you want integrated sound?

For multimedia use, the hardware would not give you the audio quality of a good sound card.

For gaming - your audio quality, effects options in games, and most importantly frame rates will suffer.

For home recording, you will have poor quality and latency with integrated audio solutions.

And I presume if this PC was just for office use, then you wouldn't have posted this as you wouldn't care.

So, for general PC use I would heartily recommend the Creative X-Fi. It offers good audio quality for all but the most demanding studio applications, plenty of multimedia-related options, and all the state-of-the-art surround-sound/EAX/3D functionality you could want. Foremost, it also has the most powerful integrated processor(s) of any sound card to date, which means that it takes a hefty load off your CPU and will thus give you the best frame rates in games.

If you cant afford an X-Fi, then I would suggest looking at the Audigy series.

NB: I have a Creative X-Fi Platinum, and its the best sound card I have ever owned. I've owned plenty of soundcards, from the Original Soundblaster to ISA ones with 'wavetable' and rudimentary 3D sound, to Yamaha XG to SB Live, and I've also used various onboard solutions including nForce.

I use the PC for audio/music editing/recording, multimedia, and gaming, and the X-Fi excels in all departments for the price.

Bottom line: If you are building a new PC, then I seriously recommend investing in a soundcard rather than integrated audio. X-Fi if you can afford it, if not something in the Audigy range. At the end of the day, there is no point having a nice new CPU if it is crippled by overheads from audio processing. If you aren't going to be gaming, or editing audio, or viewing/listening to alot of multimedia, then I guess any of the onboard solutions will do.
 

chocobocorey

Distinguished
Jan 8, 2006
327
0
18,780
Why do you want integrated sound?
So, for general PC use I would heartily recommend the Creative X-Fi. It offers good audio quality for all but the most demanding studio applications, plenty of multimedia-related options, and all the state-of-the-art surround-sound/EAX/3D functionality you could want. Foremost, it also has the most powerful integrated processor(s) of any sound card to date, which means that it takes a hefty load off your CPU and will thus give you the best frame rates in games.

so how much is creative paying you? :p
 

pcwhiz

Distinguished
May 4, 2006
28
0
18,530
From my personal experience, I don't find any major issues with integrated sound. For basic gaming, or listening to music, an integrated sound solution should be fine. It should not have a significant effect on framerates if you have a good graphics card and a good cpu.