Is this normal fps for a 6870 on Battlefield 3?
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Is my minimum fps normal for this config on 64 player conquest Gulf of Oman? Do I have a bottleneck? All High, no AA or motion blur.
Frames:46746, time:959921, min:25, max:108, avg:48.698.
Then next benchmark is played on gulf of oman again on 67 player conquest but this benchmark is shorter. I tried different settings because of this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxB01hwMouU&feature=plcp.... It is played with with Ultra textures and terrain decoration, and medium mesh, but the others are low. this is without HBAO AA and motion blur. Frames:22889, Time:475928, Min:30, Max:73, Avg:48.093.
The FPS drops when I'm looking over the map in a heli or when there is a lot of destruction or explosions.
Resolution is 1440x900 native
Here's my config:
Mobo: N-Alvorix-RS880
PSU: Rockefish 500watt
Ram:4gb ddr3 1333mhz hyundai electronics ram, and 2gb ddr3 1333mhz elpida
CPU:AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1ghz
GPU: HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 6870 OC @ 955mhz core/1180mhz memory @ 1.2V
HDD:1tb Hitachi 7200rpm, 320gb Seagate 7200rpm
Frames:46746, time:959921, min:25, max:108, avg:48.698.
Then next benchmark is played on gulf of oman again on 67 player conquest but this benchmark is shorter. I tried different settings because of this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxB01hwMouU&feature=plcp.... It is played with with Ultra textures and terrain decoration, and medium mesh, but the others are low. this is without HBAO AA and motion blur. Frames:22889, Time:475928, Min:30, Max:73, Avg:48.093.
The FPS drops when I'm looking over the map in a heli or when there is a lot of destruction or explosions.
Resolution is 1440x900 native
Here's my config:
Mobo: N-Alvorix-RS880
PSU: Rockefish 500watt
Ram:4gb ddr3 1333mhz hyundai electronics ram, and 2gb ddr3 1333mhz elpida
CPU:AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1ghz
GPU: HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 6870 OC @ 955mhz core/1180mhz memory @ 1.2V
HDD:1tb Hitachi 7200rpm, 320gb Seagate 7200rpm
More about : normal fps 6870 battlefield
That's an interesting benchmark and probably best if compared by you to the published BF3 benchmarks.
With the time you invested in doing this you also know that a more expensive or capable piece of hardware can improve your scores. So is this outcome good for you or do you want more performance? If you have XX amount of dollars what would you do? A $200 1920x1080 monitor might be nice but if you played at that res. your FPS would drop like a rock. For that same $200 you can get another 6870 GPU and dramatically increase FPS and/or gaming settings. BUT! That pesky Rocketfish 500W PSU could hold you back on that GPU upgrade. So, what to do, what to do? Or are you just looking for someone to pat you on the back and say, "WOW!, Great benches, endrew."?![:)]( ":)")
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-3-graph...
With the time you invested in doing this you also know that a more expensive or capable piece of hardware can improve your scores. So is this outcome good for you or do you want more performance? If you have XX amount of dollars what would you do? A $200 1920x1080 monitor might be nice but if you played at that res. your FPS would drop like a rock. For that same $200 you can get another 6870 GPU and dramatically increase FPS and/or gaming settings. BUT! That pesky Rocketfish 500W PSU could hold you back on that GPU upgrade. So, what to do, what to do? Or are you just looking for someone to pat you on the back and say, "WOW!, Great benches, endrew."?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-3-graph...
DelroyMonjo said:
That's an interesting benchmark and probably best if compared by you to the published BF3 benchmarks. With the time you invested in doing this you also know that a more expensive or capable piece of hardware can improve your scores. So is this outcome good for you or do you want more performance? If you have XX amount of dollars what would you do? A $200 1920x1080 monitor might be nice but if you played at that res. your FPS would drop like a rock. For that same $200 you can get another 6870 GPU and dramatically increase FPS and/or gaming settings. BUT! That pesky Rocketfish 500W PSU could hold you back on that GPU upgrade. So, what to do, what to do? Or are you just looking for someone to pat you on the back and say, "WOW!, Great benches, endrew."?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-3-graph...
Thanks for replying. Yeah i just want more performance, but overall im pretty satisfied. I'm just weirded out that i have a low minimum fps for a res of 1440x900. I tried using my brother's 1600x900 monitor and there wasn't that much hit in performance. I got a budget about 5 dollars since im in highschool and only get money every chinese new year. However, i cant crossfire anyway since my mobo is oem and has only one pcie x16
Related ressources:
- ForumBattlefield 3 Low fps at first then goes back to normal
- ForumBattlefield 3 Fps
- ForumXFX AMD HD 6870 Frame Rate Drops in Battlefield 3
- ForumBattlefield Bad Company 2, Low FPS w/ GTX 275
- Forum7950 in battlefield 3 a minimum of 30 fps
- ForumBattlefield 3 - Amd 1090t Bottleneck?
- ForumLow fps on Battlefield 3 using hd4770
- ForumXFX Radeon HD 6870 Battlefield 3 issue
- ForumBattlefield 3 Radeon 6850 FPS
- ForumBattlefield 3 w/ GTX 660 and i 3 540 average fps ?
- Forum6870 - 6750oc - GTX460oc (Heavy Multiplayer battlefield 3 )
- ForumBattlefield 3 Bottle necking
- ForumGTX 670, fps in BF 3 minimum 37, avg about 50.. normal ? 1920x1200?
- ForumBattlefield 3 - 570 , 6970 or 6870 ?? BEST RELATION PRICE/PERFORMANCE?
- ForumGTX 560 ti 6870 or 6950 for BF 3 Battlefield 3 Ultra
- Forum1Gb vs 2Gb graphics
- Forum6870 for 110 USD: Worth it for me?
- ForumIs this Card Reference?
- ForumCrossfire XFX HD 6870 Dual Fans and my PSU.
- ForumWhats the best nvidia graphics card for battlefield 3
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!
