Eh, not really, you will be pushing it in my opinion. Its not the graphics card, its mostly the processor and the ram for me in my opinion. I'm guessing its DDR2 ram from the low clocks, that surely not going to help. The Processor is one of the best Core 2 Duo's out there, but, its not going to help either.
Really, you're matching a 660ti, a half arsed card (I think its a waste of money, don't buy it if you haven't bought it yet, go for a 7870 GHZ), with not the best system.
Neither honestly. an i5-2500K or 3570K is all you need to max out any game @ 1080p. The FX-8150 isn't bad for DirectX11 games (which Crysis 2 supports), it matches any similarly priced Intel CPU, but not every game uses DX11, and there are some games the FX CPUs do get embarrassed by Intel. Having made you aware of that, just so you know what you're getting into, an FX-8120 is cheaper, and is essentially the same CPU as the FX-8150, its just clocked lower. Since both are unlocked, why not look at an 8120 if you wanted to go that route?
Also, since you're looking to do this next month, FX-8350s (the new generation) will be on the table at that time, they should be a little more competitive to Intel (albeit probably behind in certain things as they already are). Particularly, single core performance is where AMD suffers. AMD has CPUs with more cores that individually perform worse (8 core FX-8 vs 4 core i5 for example).
I actually think its worth trying Crysis 2 on your overclocked C2D. You might be surprised with it, never know.
better get the fx 8350 with 970 or 990fx chipset mobo the fx 8350 is a very good chip for its price it is performing somewhat equal to i5 3570k which is $20 more then that chip the multi threded performance of fx 8350 is superb in some benchmarks it performs better then i7 3770k which is about $100 more then that cpu.
most of the people says that fx cpus are fail but they dont look at the price they are superb in multitasking ,overlocking,stays under 50c most with stock heatsink also the place amd get behind is the single threaded performance and gaming but in games it is just 1-5 fps behind which means nothing to me.
before some time when bulldozer was launched i have read the review saying that its an fail the most of the guiys here were asking about fx 4100,fx 6100,fx 8120,8150 vs i5,i3 at that time i was also giving the people that advice that its an fail but after some time my freind bought fx 4100 i thought he has done wrong but after seeing its performance i just shocked in games it is same as i3 and in application it is performing close to i5 my mouth was just get wide open that time fxs are the best cpus for price
dont let the reviews make you fool get the fx 8350 and see the performance with your own most of the guys thinking has changed about fxs after using it