Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Any thoughts on the Rebel XT digital, 8MP, compared to say the Canon EOS 10D
that I already own? (6.2MP) I would love to increase tonal pickup,
resolution, wondering if it would really be worth the upgrade.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I can not comment on increase in tonal pickup,
But 8 MP is only about 30 percent more than 6 Mp. (Area)
But is is only about 15 percent more in linear size. So the
theoritical resolution is 15 percent more.
15 percent more is not a lot. (And very often not visible in pictures).
(So choosing between camera's 15 % is an advantage, for upgrading
15 % is not a lot).
DPReview gave these numbers for 'resolution'.
D350
Horiz LPH 1850
Vert LPH 1650
10D
Horiz LPH 1600
Vert LPH 1450
ben brugman
"Proteus" <nospam@nowhere.net> schreef in bericht news:FJ5He.1820$4F5.714@fe06.lga...
> Any thoughts on the Rebel XT digital, 8MP, compared to say the Canon EOS 10D
> that I already own? (6.2MP) I would love to increase tonal pickup,
> resolution, wondering if it would really be worth the upgrade.
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Proteus" <nospam@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:FJ5He.1820$4F5.714@fe06.lga...
> Any thoughts on the Rebel XT digital, 8MP, compared to say the Canon EOS
> 10D
> that I already own? (6.2MP) I would love to increase tonal pickup,
> resolution, wondering if it would really be worth the upgrade.
The XT is a bit small and light compared to your 10D. I'd handle one before
making a decision. It also uses a different battery.
The marginal increase in resolution does not justify an upgrade, in my
opinion.
I would think the color accuracy is about the same.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <VZCdnYk7e7uJs3DfRVn-2g@comcast.com>, Charles Schuler
<charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote:
> The XT is a bit small and light compared to your 10D. I'd handle one before
> making a decision. It also uses a different battery.
>
> The marginal increase in resolution does not justify an upgrade, in my
> opinion.
I have both. The reason I only use the 10D as a backup is that the XT
is faster, starts up right away, and it feels more responsive. It has a
later version of the Digic processor.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Ben Brugman" <Ben@niethier.nl> a écrit dans le message de news:
Ms-dnXJLXdDumHDfRVnyhQ@casema.nl...
>I can not comment on increase in tonal pickup,
>
> DPReview gave these numbers for 'resolution'.
> D350
> Horiz LPH 1850
> Vert LPH 1650
>
> 10D
> Horiz LPH 1600
> Vert LPH 1450
>
> ben brugman
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <FJ5He.1820$4F5.714@fe06.lga>, nospam@nowhere.net says...
> Any thoughts on the Rebel XT digital, 8MP, compared to say the Canon EOS 10D
> that I already own? (6.2MP) I would love to increase tonal pickup,
> resolution, wondering if it would really be worth the upgrade.
I've got the 10D and I'm waiting out a cycle. The 20D would be nice but
the cash isn't there for it. To me,the 350D/Rebel XT doesn't offer
enough of the things I want besides quick startup.
--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I have the 10D. I, like Brian Baird, am waiting for a newer model. I
will hold out longer, though. My next new digital SLR will be whatever
replaces the replacement for the 20D.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Proteus wrote:
> Any thoughts on the Rebel XT digital, 8MP, compared to say the Canon EOS
> 10D
> that I already own? (6.2MP) I would love to increase tonal pickup,
> resolution, wondering if it would really be worth the upgrade.
ok i am going to wait for the generation beyond the XT before upgrading,
based on all the postings to my original post. Thanks all!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.