Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Newbie - fireworks pics - comments

Newbie - fireworks pics - comments

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - Newbie - fireworks pics - comments

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Hi

Recently I took some photos of a fireworks display and concert at
Warwick Castle - http://gallery.jake.org.uk/wkfworks - EXIF data
available by clicking on "photo properties".

I'm pretty new to photography, so a lot of it was guesswork, but for
my first attempt I'm fairly happy with the results.

The camera's a Canon Powershot S70. Exposure is generally 10 to 15
seconds (15 is the camera's max) and the aperture is set to f8.0,
again the camera's max (or should that be min?!). The camera was
mounted on a tripod and the shutter released remotely using the infra
red remote control. Most of the images have been cropped, some
heavily, and then uploaded at 2 megapixels max. Other than cropping
there have been no further adjustments.

My own comments:
- Sometimes 15s exposure can be a bit limiting, especially when the
fireworks are more sparse.
- Could do with a smaller aperture when the fireworks are more
intense, some of the pictures appear burnt out.
- The fireworks are offset from the stage, but in a field of 4,000
people you can't be picky about your location!

Comments and suggestions for improvement welcome!

Thanks

Jake

p.s. it was a fabulous concert :-)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Nice shots, to get rid of that light background you can bring up the
contrast a heap, I did this on #6 and it looks much better.

"Muxton" <jake@jake.org.mungbeans.uk> wrote in message
news:78lgf15pva02lvdidg9b7ttbcc4odq97l4@4ax.com...
> Hi
>
> Recently I took some photos of a fireworks display and concert at
> Warwick Castle - http://gallery.jake.org.uk/wkfworks - EXIF data
> available by clicking on "photo properties".
>
> I'm pretty new to photography, so a lot of it was guesswork, but for
> my first attempt I'm fairly happy with the results.
>
> The camera's a Canon Powershot S70. Exposure is generally 10 to 15
> seconds (15 is the camera's max) and the aperture is set to f8.0,
> again the camera's max (or should that be min?!). The camera was
> mounted on a tripod and the shutter released remotely using the infra
> red remote control. Most of the images have been cropped, some
> heavily, and then uploaded at 2 megapixels max. Other than cropping
> there have been no further adjustments.
>
> My own comments:
> - Sometimes 15s exposure can be a bit limiting, especially when the
> fireworks are more sparse.
> - Could do with a smaller aperture when the fireworks are more
> intense, some of the pictures appear burnt out.
> - The fireworks are offset from the stage, but in a field of 4,000
> people you can't be picky about your location!
>
> Comments and suggestions for improvement welcome!
>
> Thanks
>
> Jake
>
> p.s. it was a fabulous concert :-)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:47:13 GMT, "Pete D" <no@email.com> wrote:

>Nice shots, to get rid of that light background you can bring up the
>contrast a heap, I did this on #6 and it looks much better.

Thanks Pete :)

I tried your tip on pic #6 and the result was excellent!

I also tried it on one of the longer exposure pics, and it brings out
too much of the blue in the sky, so I'll have a play and find out some
other ways of tweaking those.

Jake

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Muxton" <jake@jake.org.mungbeans.uk> wrote in message
news:h4qhf1h2k6b4q9c3o48cj4s4pcj63elvh6@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:47:13 GMT, "Pete D" <no@email.com> wrote:
>
>>Nice shots, to get rid of that light background you can bring up the
>>contrast a heap, I did this on #6 and it looks much better.
>
> Thanks Pete :)
>
> I tried your tip on pic #6 and the result was excellent!
>
> I also tried it on one of the longer exposure pics, and it brings out
> too much of the blue in the sky, so I'll have a play and find out some
> other ways of tweaking those.
>
> Jake

Cool, next time remember to try at F11.

Cheers.

Pete

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:14:46 GMT, "Pete D" <no@email.com> wrote:

>
>"Muxton" <jake@jake.org.mungbeans.uk> wrote in message
>news:h4qhf1h2k6b4q9c3o48cj4s4pcj63elvh6@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:47:13 GMT, "Pete D" <no@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Nice shots, to get rid of that light background you can bring up the
>>>contrast a heap, I did this on #6 and it looks much better.
>>
>> Thanks Pete :)
>>
>> I tried your tip on pic #6 and the result was excellent!
>>
>> I also tried it on one of the longer exposure pics, and it brings out
>> too much of the blue in the sky, so I'll have a play and find out some
>> other ways of tweaking those.
>>
>> Jake
>
>Cool, next time remember to try at F11.
>
>Cheers.
>
>Pete
>

The S70 only goes to f8.0 :(

I'm new to all this and already grumbling about my camera!

Jake

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Muxton, you did fine!!! And you're absolutely correct, 15 seconds is
limiting (30 is much better if the sky is indeed dark enough).

There is a term in photography for defining the portion of the image that is
in "sharp" focus (sharp being relative).....it's call hyperfocal distance.
It's that aperture setting that everything within a certain near distance to
infinity is in focus. It varies with the focal length of the lens -- the
wider the lens, the wider the aperture may be to capture a sharp image.
There are tables on the web that tell what those hyperfocal settings are for
a given focal length -- Canon's web sit might even have it for the S70's
lens?? Hmmm, and those will probably be in 35mm focal length so you'll need
to do a conversion to your digital camera lens.

Hope this helps.

"Muxton" <jake@jake.org.mungbeans.uk> wrote in message
news:78lgf15pva02lvdidg9b7ttbcc4odq97l4@4ax.com...
> Hi
>
> Recently I took some photos of a fireworks display and concert at
> Warwick Castle - http://gallery.jake.org.uk/wkfworks - EXIF data
> available by clicking on "photo properties".
>
> I'm pretty new to photography, so a lot of it was guesswork, but for
> my first attempt I'm fairly happy with the results.
>
> The camera's a Canon Powershot S70. Exposure is generally 10 to 15
> seconds (15 is the camera's max) and the aperture is set to f8.0,
> again the camera's max (or should that be min?!). The camera was
> mounted on a tripod and the shutter released remotely using the infra
> red remote control. Most of the images have been cropped, some
> heavily, and then uploaded at 2 megapixels max. Other than cropping
> there have been no further adjustments.
>
> My own comments:
> - Sometimes 15s exposure can be a bit limiting, especially when the
> fireworks are more sparse.
> - Could do with a smaller aperture when the fireworks are more
> intense, some of the pictures appear burnt out.
> - The fireworks are offset from the stage, but in a field of 4,000
> people you can't be picky about your location!
>
> Comments and suggestions for improvement welcome!
>
> Thanks
>
> Jake
>
> p.s. it was a fabulous concert :-)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:56:13 -0500, "Mike Rooney" <M.Rooney7@cox.net>
wrote:

>Muxton, you did fine!!! And you're absolutely correct, 15 seconds is
>limiting (30 is much better if the sky is indeed dark enough).
>
>There is a term in photography for defining the portion of the image that is
>in "sharp" focus (sharp being relative).....it's call hyperfocal distance.
>It's that aperture setting that everything within a certain near distance to
>infinity is in focus. It varies with the focal length of the lens -- the
>wider the lens, the wider the aperture may be to capture a sharp image.
>There are tables on the web that tell what those hyperfocal settings are for
>a given focal length -- Canon's web sit might even have it for the S70's
>lens?? Hmmm, and those will probably be in 35mm focal length so you'll need
>to do a conversion to your digital camera lens.
>
>Hope this helps.
>

That's great, thanks. I'll check it out. Focus was one of the issues
I had - I had to leave it fixed, but I wasn't sure where! (I left it a
little short of infinity).

From what I've seen so far Canon tends to express actual focal length
with 35mm equivalent in brackets after, so it shouldn't be too hard to
convert. All of the fireworks pics were shot at 28mm focal length
(35mm equivalent) - which according to the Canon site is 5.8mm. One
day I'll work out what all that means, but that day is not today :-p

Jake

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Newbie - fireworks pics - comments
Go to:

There are 1202 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them