Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

Core Clock VS Memory Clock

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
a c 127 U Graphics card
a b } Memory
May 12, 2012 12:16:56 PM

Looking at two HD7850 cards, both at the same price point (the Sapphire 2Gb OC and Gigabyte 2GB OC models). Both appear to be essentially identical but the biggest difference between them is their memory and core clocks.

Just wondering which of the two I should get based purely on those numbers (ignore cooling, size and all that)

Gigabyte: 975MHz core clock speed, 4.8GHz Memory Clock (effective)
Sapphire: Core clock of 920 MHz and a 5000MHz (effective) memory clock

Assume I'm not going to overclock these as well.
a c 84 U Graphics card
May 12, 2012 12:39:47 PM

Quote:
Core clock will give you much bigger performance gains.


+1 :D 
Score
0
a c 181 U Graphics card
a b } Memory
May 13, 2012 2:44:27 AM

Yeah the Gigabyte is the better of the the two. Core clock trumps memory. Good luck to you
Score
0
Related resources
a c 127 U Graphics card
a b } Memory
May 23, 2012 5:59:51 AM

Best answer selected by Manofchalk.
Score
0
May 23, 2012 5:53:25 PM

Yes but one of the cards might overclock better than the other. Go for the one with the best cooling. Not sure why you'd ignore cooling etc. I would say the Sapphire card could easily get to 975 from where it started. I have a 7950 and I was able to get it to 910 without upping gpu care voltage I'm sure it could do 1GHz no problem. Mine is a sapphire with the dual fan.
Score
0
a c 272 U Graphics card
May 23, 2012 6:08:12 PM

This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey
Score
0
!