Gentlemen,
Given some of the pricining I'm finding online I believe the time has come to upgrade my venerable system. Like many of you I need to spend every penny wisely. I am also interested in efficiency and economy of components. Having said that I do realize that to a large extent performance is relative to power. Currently my choice for best bang for the buck processor is:
AMD Athlon II X3 450 Rana 3.2GHz Socket AM3 95W Triple-Core .....$54.00
I have read many reviews and this cpu is very well liked. Additionally the possibility exists of unlocking a fourth core (that may or may not be stable). I have seen commentary that states with 4 cores this is a Phenom by another name. I have also seen rather spirited commentary that even with 4 cores this is NOT a Phenom at all. Additionally some have said that unlocking the fourth core will access an L3 cache which doesn't exist on the stock 3 core offering. Any clarification on the above is welcomed.
Another interesting contender is:AMD Athlon II X2 270 Regor 3.4GHz Socket AM3 65W Dual Core.....$55.00
Though a dual core, this a contender because:
a.) 3.4 Ghz
b.) 2 x 1MB L2 Cache
c.) 65W
Faster stock clock, more L2 Cache, and lower power consumption seem to put the 270 Regor ahead but it seems to good to be true. Also some have commented that some of the Athlon Dual Cores can unlock a 3rd and 4th core. I do not know if the 270 is one of those. Let me make it absolutely clear that I am interested in these chips as they are (stock). If there are extra useable cores then that's a plus. If there aren't then it doesn't affect my interest in these cpus.
None of these have L3 Cache. I have been told that L3 cache is absoultuley essential for good gaming performance. Is the lack of L3 cache rreally an issue here?
My strategy is to invest more money in a better AM3 mobo and vid card and then I can upgrade the cpu's above in the future. I would like to keep my current psu which is another advantage to keep lower TDP for the cpu and spend it on the vid card and other items.
A final note - I have posted in other online forums. I've been surprised at the general arrogance and attitude I've gotten about these older cpus. I'm not a novice and I understand that these are older cpus but my system is even older than that and these would be a really nice upgrade for me. It used to be that the tech community in general was always glad to help and never passed judgement. Things seem different today with comments like "and you're probably looking for a reel to reel drive I bet". None of the responses I've received in other forums have answered a single question I've asked. What happened to the comraderie and attitude of the old days?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Old School Ninja
Given some of the pricining I'm finding online I believe the time has come to upgrade my venerable system. Like many of you I need to spend every penny wisely. I am also interested in efficiency and economy of components. Having said that I do realize that to a large extent performance is relative to power. Currently my choice for best bang for the buck processor is:
AMD Athlon II X3 450 Rana 3.2GHz Socket AM3 95W Triple-Core .....$54.00
I have read many reviews and this cpu is very well liked. Additionally the possibility exists of unlocking a fourth core (that may or may not be stable). I have seen commentary that states with 4 cores this is a Phenom by another name. I have also seen rather spirited commentary that even with 4 cores this is NOT a Phenom at all. Additionally some have said that unlocking the fourth core will access an L3 cache which doesn't exist on the stock 3 core offering. Any clarification on the above is welcomed.
Another interesting contender is:AMD Athlon II X2 270 Regor 3.4GHz Socket AM3 65W Dual Core.....$55.00
Though a dual core, this a contender because:
a.) 3.4 Ghz
b.) 2 x 1MB L2 Cache
c.) 65W
Faster stock clock, more L2 Cache, and lower power consumption seem to put the 270 Regor ahead but it seems to good to be true. Also some have commented that some of the Athlon Dual Cores can unlock a 3rd and 4th core. I do not know if the 270 is one of those. Let me make it absolutely clear that I am interested in these chips as they are (stock). If there are extra useable cores then that's a plus. If there aren't then it doesn't affect my interest in these cpus.
None of these have L3 Cache. I have been told that L3 cache is absoultuley essential for good gaming performance. Is the lack of L3 cache rreally an issue here?
My strategy is to invest more money in a better AM3 mobo and vid card and then I can upgrade the cpu's above in the future. I would like to keep my current psu which is another advantage to keep lower TDP for the cpu and spend it on the vid card and other items.
A final note - I have posted in other online forums. I've been surprised at the general arrogance and attitude I've gotten about these older cpus. I'm not a novice and I understand that these are older cpus but my system is even older than that and these would be a really nice upgrade for me. It used to be that the tech community in general was always glad to help and never passed judgement. Things seem different today with comments like "and you're probably looking for a reel to reel drive I bet". None of the responses I've received in other forums have answered a single question I've asked. What happened to the comraderie and attitude of the old days?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Old School Ninja