Jessica Simpson, Photoshop or Drawing?

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Anthony" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:iuadnTAZJuNHAmbfRVnyrA@pipex.net...
> Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
>
> http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukeso [...] jessica800
>

I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but
I'm positive
1) The car is a drawing
2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.

Norm

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Kinon O'Cann" <somew@re.over.the.rainbow> wrote in message
news:lWNKe.2$Yk5.0@bos-service2.ext.ray.com...
>
> "Anthony" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:iuadnTAZJuNHAmbfRVnyrA@pipex.net...
> > Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
>
> Either way, I think those are fake tits.
>

---------
They're probably fake in real life too.

Journalist

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Who cares if they are fake??? I like them....(8-> )

Bobo
"Journalist-North" <journalist-north@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:i6OKe.2633$1i7.357@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Kinon O'Cann" <somew@re.over.the.rainbow> wrote in message
> news:lWNKe.2$Yk5.0@bos-service2.ext.ray.com...
>>
>> "Anthony" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:iuadnTAZJuNHAmbfRVnyrA@pipex.net...
>> > Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
>>
>> Either way, I think those are fake tits.
>>
>
> ---------
> They're probably fake in real life too.
>
> Journalist
>
>
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:25:10 GMT, "Norm Dresner" <ndrez@att.net>
scribbled:

>"Anthony" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:iuadnTAZJuNHAmbfRVnyrA@pipex.net...
>> Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
>>
>> http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukeso [...] jessica800
>>
>
>I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but
>I'm positive
> 1) The car is a drawing

The car's a photograph, while her image in particular the face and chest
is just air brushed insanity.

Look at the larger image:
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukeso [...] essica1280

> 2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.

Aren't you brilliant.

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Voivod" <Voi@vod.con> wrote in message
news:24enf19eibekiutkuep2b4d9tpe14e8phn@news-server...
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:25:10 GMT, "Norm Dresner" <ndrez@att.net>
> scribbled:
>
> >"Anthony" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >news:iuadnTAZJuNHAmbfRVnyrA@pipex.net...
> >> Is Jessica Simpson in this pic a Photoshopped photo, or a drawing?
> >>
> >>
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukeso [...] jessica800
> >>
> >
> >I see too much detail in the muscle structure for it to be a drawing, but
> >I'm positive
> > 1) The car is a drawing
>
> The car's a photograph, while her image in particular the face and chest
> is just air brushed insanity.
>
> Look at the larger image:
>
http://promo.warnerbros.com/dukeso [...] essica1280
>
> > 2) Her photo was added to the drawing in something like Photoshop.
>
> Aren't you brilliant.
GOOD GRIEF! VOIVOD IS RESURRECTED???

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Fresh_n00b" <abloke@aplace.com> wrote in message
news:42fd7708$0$8999$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> hehehe OK so I lost that bet, but your true, the digital touching up of
> celebs is in some cases downright criminal and mildly annoying in most.
> I was holidaying on the Gold Coast a couple of years ago and the amount of
> women who all looked the same was disheartening, they all had the same
> hair/teeth/boobs/figure. While I wouldn't knock back a "ride" with Jessica
> Simpson, I don't think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a
> shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb
> wannabe's
So you're saying that if you walked around the beach looking at a bunch of
ugly sows
you'd be more ok with that? The world needs more men like you.

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Fresh,
I want to shop where you do! She'd stand out around here. But seriously
she looks a lot better on TV then that poster. Something about the face
just looks plastic which isn't the case the few times I've seen her on TV.
Paul


Fresh_n00b wrote:

snipped

I don't think I could be married to her, you would loose her in a
> shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb
> wannabe's

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

no Im saying that I thought I was looking at the same woman walking around
the beaches because they all have exactly the same facial features, hair
style and colour and boob size, variety is the spice of life and
unfortunately beauty has become a homogenised product now days, if you don't
look a certain way, you wont get the good gigs.

"Scruff" <Get@Grip> wrote in message
news:39e6c$42fde3cd$422ab18f$12596@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Fresh_n00b" <abloke@aplace.com> wrote in message
> news:42fd7708$0$8999$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> hehehe OK so I lost that bet, but your true, the digital touching up of
>> celebs is in some cases downright criminal and mildly annoying in most.
>> I was holidaying on the Gold Coast a couple of years ago and the amount
>> of
>> women who all looked the same was disheartening, they all had the same
>> hair/teeth/boobs/figure. While I wouldn't knock back a "ride" with
>> Jessica
>> Simpson, I don't think I could be married to her, you would loose her in
>> a
>> shopping mall because she would just blend into the other "Plastic" celeb
>> wannabe's
> So you're saying that if you walked around the beach looking at a bunch of
> ugly sows
> you'd be more ok with that? The world needs more men like you.
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli <cylise@gmail.com.invalid>
wrote:


>
>Whoever did whatever to the photo didn't do anything to the ankles or
>did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo
>looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a
>marathon runner. The result isn't consistent throughout.
>
>Cyli


bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles?
And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat
myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to
the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.

Dave

Archived from groups: alt.graphics.photoshop,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:06:40 -0500, Cyli <cylise@gmail.com.invalid>
wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:30:53 +0200, DD <dave@durbs.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:58 -0500, Cyli <cylise@gmail.com.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Whoever did whatever to the photo didn't do anything to the ankles or
>>>did it all wrong. Big lumpy masses. And, while the rest of her photo
>>>looks delicate (except the overly large breasts), the legs look like a
>>>marathon runner. The result isn't consistent throughout.
>>>
>>>Cyli
>>
>>
>>bullshit! She is no petit woman, but she must have petit ankles?
>>And this while the rest of her is quite musclelar? Let me repeat
>>myself, bullshit! Most probably there is some editing done to
>>the photo, but that gets done to most of the photos of models.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>I'd agree with you except for the obscenity and the spelling _IF_ the
>rest of the thing made her look muscular. It doesn't. It makes her
>look dainty and slim. While she may be muscular in real life, the
>work in question doesn't make her look it until it gets below the
>knee. Had they shown the muscle that she probably has (it's
>fashionable for women to be buff these days), I'd have had no problem
>with it.

Cyyli, this was the first time I saw the woman! And she makes one
lovely wallpaper:-)))

I don't live in Europe or the USA, neither in the East.
I doubt that she's on our TV, and I would not really know,
my PC is my TV:-)

My expression was only concerning what I see
in the photo. 'obscenity? cause I said "bullshit"?
'kay, sorry:-) Spelling? English is one of three
languages I can communicate in, but not
my home language. I know I know there is
a spell checker on my news reader, but I
am not even going to use it now. Busy working
on something else, and apart from that, it is
1.00 am here, so Good Bye:-)

Dave