Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize (
More info?)
Most interesting and ditto on Walter's Q's.
--
In memory of our dear friend, MVP Alex Nichol: http://www.dts-l.org/
All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)
Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
"Walter Clayton" <w-claytonNO@SPmvpsAM.org> wrote in message
news:%23LAoQlqQFHA.1396@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> "Admin" <Net*man@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:rpv161hkctvnuactrij2o1g26ncd907ckq@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:47:18 -0400, "Walter Clayton"
>> <w-claytonNO@SPmvps.AMorg> wrote:
>>
>>>The area of the registry is
>>>HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SafeBoot.
>>>One branch is sans network support and the other has network support.
>>>
>>>However, it would be ill advised to attempt to force a 3rd party service
>>>to
>>>start in safe mode. In this specific instances there be dependant
>>>services
>>>that aren't started as well as other issues. Your best bet is to take it
>>>up
>>>with the vendor to supply the support rather than attempting to hack your
>>>way into it.
>>
>>
>> You are right, but as I indicated in a previous post, the vendor says
>> the application is thorougly tested under safemode as to be able to
>> run without causing any problem but the vendor would not care to say
>> anymore than it needs manual addition of some registry entries to make
>> the driver load in safemode.
>>
>> Kugar
>
> ...and they fail to provide said registry entries?
> If they have, in fact, tested it in safe mode without ill effects, then I
> have to question why they are reticent to post the registry entries on
> their web site, or send them to you via e-mail. If they know what the
> requirements are and they continue to fail to supply the 'hack', I'd have
> to really and truly question their claims with regard safe mode. Hacking
> things blindly by yourself is just as likely to hose safe mode which is
> not a good thing.
>
> I'm tempted to say to tell them to provide the registry files or a refund,
> their choice.
>
> --
> Walter Clayton
> Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
>
>