K kiran12 Honorable May 11, 2012 95 0 10,630 Jun 1, 2012 #1 which 1 is the best? Does more RAM is good ? how ?
Solution Sunius Jun 1, 2012 Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper.
Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper.
fantastik250 Distinguished Mar 19, 2011 2,437 0 20,160 Jun 1, 2012 #2 More VRAM is good for graphic intensive games such as the current generation games of Battlefield 3 and Diablo 3. Here take a look a this (GTX 560 vs 6870): http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/327742-33-6870 Upvote 0 Downvote
More VRAM is good for graphic intensive games such as the current generation games of Battlefield 3 and Diablo 3. Here take a look a this (GTX 560 vs 6870): http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/327742-33-6870
K kiran12 Honorable May 11, 2012 95 0 10,630 Jun 1, 2012 #3 fantastik250 : More VRAM is good for graphic intensive games such as the current generation games of Battlefield 3 and Diablo 3. Here take a look a this (GTX 560 vs 6870): http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/327742-33-6870 I see gtx 560 2gb ddr5 and radeon hd 6870 1gb ddr5 have got same price. Which 1 do u prefer for better fps? Upvote 0 Downvote
fantastik250 : More VRAM is good for graphic intensive games such as the current generation games of Battlefield 3 and Diablo 3. Here take a look a this (GTX 560 vs 6870): http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/327742-33-6870 I see gtx 560 2gb ddr5 and radeon hd 6870 1gb ddr5 have got same price. Which 1 do u prefer for better fps?
fantastik250 Distinguished Mar 19, 2011 2,437 0 20,160 Jun 1, 2012 #4 In terms of performance for FPS the 6870>560 (non Ti version) If you get the 560 Ti, it would perform better than the 6870. Upvote 0 Downvote
In terms of performance for FPS the 6870>560 (non Ti version) If you get the 560 Ti, it would perform better than the 6870.
K kiran12 Honorable May 11, 2012 95 0 10,630 Jun 1, 2012 #5 fantastik250 : In terms of performance for FPS the 6870>560 (non Ti version) If you get the 560 Ti, it would perform better than the 6870. So the more VRAM Doesn't matter in performance? Upvote 0 Downvote
fantastik250 : In terms of performance for FPS the 6870>560 (non Ti version) If you get the 560 Ti, it would perform better than the 6870. So the more VRAM Doesn't matter in performance?
Sunius Splendid Dec 19, 2010 9,588 0 31,960 Jun 1, 2012 Solution #6 Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper. Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper.
K kiran12 Honorable May 11, 2012 95 0 10,630 Jun 1, 2012 #7 Best answer selected by kiran12. Upvote 0 Downvote
K kiran12 Honorable May 11, 2012 95 0 10,630 Jun 1, 2012 #8 Sunius : Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Palit/GeForce_GTX_560_2_GB/images/perfrel.gif I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper. Thanks. It helped me. Upvote 0 Downvote
Sunius : Extra VRAM doesn't give any performance boost. I wouldn't say HD 6870 has much better performance - the difference is around 3%: http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Palit/GeForce_GTX_560_2_GB/images/perfrel.gif I'd say you should go with whichever you find cheaper. Thanks. It helped me.
Sunius Splendid Dec 19, 2010 9,588 0 31,960 Jun 1, 2012 #9 Glad I helped you make the decision . Upvote 0 Downvote