Hi all
I'm considering two models of new laptop which have nearly identical processors, one has the 3615QM and the other has the 3635QM. It should be easy, the 3635QM is slightly newer and according to PCMarkOnline, it is just a faster version of the 3615QM. (http://www.pcmarkonline.com/tag/core-i7-3630qm/: "Core i7-3630QM and i7-3635QM are slightly faster successors of i7-3610QM and 3615QM SKUs.")
However, when I check a "PassMark" benchmark it's the other way around: the 3635QM has a benchmark of 4821 and the 3615QM has a benchmark of 7329 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html)
Not sure what the benchmark is testing, but is the older CPU really the much more capable one? The difference seems quite significant.
Thanks for any advice.
I'm considering two models of new laptop which have nearly identical processors, one has the 3615QM and the other has the 3635QM. It should be easy, the 3635QM is slightly newer and according to PCMarkOnline, it is just a faster version of the 3615QM. (http://www.pcmarkonline.com/tag/core-i7-3630qm/: "Core i7-3630QM and i7-3635QM are slightly faster successors of i7-3610QM and 3615QM SKUs.")
However, when I check a "PassMark" benchmark it's the other way around: the 3635QM has a benchmark of 4821 and the 3615QM has a benchmark of 7329 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html)
Not sure what the benchmark is testing, but is the older CPU really the much more capable one? The difference seems quite significant.
Thanks for any advice.