Heaven 3 top30 scores
Tags:
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Note-I will put the top 20 sli/cf and dual gpu scores as well.
Download heaven 3.0 here
http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DX11-Benchma...
All test Settings has to be-
dx11
Tessalation normal
Shaders- High
Anisotrophy-4x
AA- 4x
Resolution- 1680x1050
here is a screenshot of settings-
![]()
I will be updating the top charts with your name everyday. All nvidia/ati single gpus allowed.
Dual gpus like hd5970, gtx590, gtx690, hd 6990 will be counted as sli/cf.
For dx10 gpus- gtx200, 300, hd 4000 series, you can run the test in dx 10(the rest of the settings remain the same) and I will be posting top 20 dx10 scores. But your gpu has to be dx10 only.
upload a screenshot of your score along with your cpu+gpu names.
Download heaven 3.0 here
http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DX11-Benchma...
All test Settings has to be-
dx11
Tessalation normal
Shaders- High
Anisotrophy-4x
AA- 4x
Resolution- 1680x1050
here is a screenshot of settings-

I will be updating the top charts with your name everyday. All nvidia/ati single gpus allowed.
Dual gpus like hd5970, gtx590, gtx690, hd 6990 will be counted as sli/cf.
For dx10 gpus- gtx200, 300, hd 4000 series, you can run the test in dx 10(the rest of the settings remain the same) and I will be posting top 20 dx10 scores. But your gpu has to be dx10 only.
upload a screenshot of your score along with your cpu+gpu names.
More about : heaven top30 scores
Top dx11 single GPU scores-
1. shamsmu i5 2500k @4.6ghz/gtx 670 (1169/7040) score-2393
2. mazvydas i7 2600k @4.7ghz/gtx 670 (1180/7150) score-2382
3. bystander i7 920 @3.8ghz/ gtx 680 (+70/300) score-2272
4. triton05 i5 2500k @4.5ghz/gtx 670 score-2169
5. matto17secs i7 875k @2.94ghz/ gtx 580(835/4098) score-1606
6. recon-uk- i5 2500k/gtx 480 score-1541
7. Sunius i5 2500k/ gtx 560 ti (950/2100) score-1187
Top sli/cf/ multi gpu scores-
1. bystander i7 920 3.8ghz/ gtx 680 sli(1085+ boost) score-3508
2. akamrcrack i5 2500k 4.5ghz/ gtx 670 sli(+105mhz/+93mhz) score-3265
Top dx10 single gpu scores-
1. Axtrua Intel quad core q8300 2.5ghz/ hd4890 score-1119
1. shamsmu i5 2500k @4.6ghz/gtx 670 (1169/7040) score-2393
2. mazvydas i7 2600k @4.7ghz/gtx 670 (1180/7150) score-2382
3. bystander i7 920 @3.8ghz/ gtx 680 (+70/300) score-2272
4. triton05 i5 2500k @4.5ghz/gtx 670 score-2169
5. matto17secs i7 875k @2.94ghz/ gtx 580(835/4098) score-1606
6. recon-uk- i5 2500k/gtx 480 score-1541
7. Sunius i5 2500k/ gtx 560 ti (950/2100) score-1187
Top sli/cf/ multi gpu scores-
1. bystander i7 920 3.8ghz/ gtx 680 sli(1085+ boost) score-3508
2. akamrcrack i5 2500k 4.5ghz/ gtx 670 sli(+105mhz/+93mhz) score-3265
Top dx10 single gpu scores-
1. Axtrua Intel quad core q8300 2.5ghz/ hd4890 score-1119
I don't understand why you'd want to play so many restrictions on your list. If you want to see how the single GPU scores, great, but wouldn't you want to know what the dual GPU setups can also do? If you were going to put together a system, it would be great to know all your options and how they perform. Though it might be nice to see the systems with dual GPU's, give results with SLI/CF disabled as well as enabled.
Related ressources
- Whats your benchmarks scores ? (Unigen heaven 3 .0.0) - Forum
- Low Heaven Benchmark Scores EVGA GTX 670 4GB? - Forum
- Ungine heaven benchmark scores - Forum
- Are my heaven scores to low?(GTX 670) - Forum
- Is this unigine heaven score bad? - Forum
bystander said:
I don't understand why you'd want to play so many restrictions on your list. If you want to see how the single GPU scores, great, but wouldn't you want to know what the dual GPU setups can also do? If you were going to put together a system, it would be great to know all your options and how they perform.fair enough I will be putting top 20 scores for sli/cf as well.
He's actually wanting it in 1680 x 1050. You should get a higher score.
Quote:
Unigene is pretty crap tbh, and is not comparable to proper games...http://i46.tinypic.com/27xqsnm.png
still imo it represents the gaming performance better than 3dmark. The whole physics scores ruin all the results.
Sunius said:
Very nice performance recon
Here's mine:
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/3729/uniginebench97522501680.png
For some reason it's reporting my GPU as intel.. It's GTX 560 Ti actually.
Until I looked at your member profile, I was blown away at the listed Intel HD listed graphics processor. I knew there had to be an error.
Here is a 680 in SLI and single. The SLI version is clocked with the factory OC of 1085 +boost. The single is OC'ed to +70/300.
![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
One more you might find interesting. This is at 1080p in 3D Vision. It's also 16x Anisotropy.
![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
bystander said:
I wouldn't be surprised that I'm bottlenecked on the SLI score without 3D Vision. The scaling doesn't seem nearly as good as it should be, but the purpose for all the GPU horsepower is 3D Vision at 1080p.nice set up you got there, what is your screen resolution? I am planning to upgrade to a i7 2600k and add another gtx 670 to my system in 2 months or so. But is it worth it?
I can already run bf3 smooth like a cupcake on a 23'' 1080p display. What is the actual gain from that sli set up?
shamsmu said:
nice set up you got there, what is your screen resolution? I am planning to upgrade to a i7 2600k and add another gtx 670 to my system in 2 months or so. But is it worth it?I can already run bf3 smooth like a cupcake on a 23'' 1080p display. What is the actual gain from that sli set up?
Like I mentioned, 3D Vision. 3D Vision halves your FPS. That means you need roughly double the GPU power for it. Notice the 3D Vision score I showed. Average 60 FPS in Heaven 3.0.
bystander said:
Like I mentioned, 3D Vision. 3D Vision halves your FPS. That means you need roughly double the GPU power for it. Notice the 3D Vision score I showed. Average 60 FPS in Heaven 3.0.yeah I have 3d vision set up as well. But the thing is I can't stand it! It's impossible to play bf3/mw3 multiplayer with it. I just can't react fast enough most of the times in 3d. Yesterday in a game of cod, my k/d ratio was 8/17 and 5 of the kills came from melee attacks. How do you find 3d vision gameplay?
I find it very good. I wouldn't play any other way when the game plays it well. However, I do find it almost required to have over 50 FPS. Anything less and latency not only makes the game feel choppy, but I get motion sickness.
In first person shooters, I also find it's required to use Nvidia's laser sites (ctrl-F12), unless the game fixes the laser site itself. Otherwise you'll find the laser sites are at the depth of your monitor and the target may be much further in, causing focusing issues (although more like real life aiming).
In games with 3rd person perspective, like Diablo 3, targets far away have the same issue, but with the use of convergence, you can bring the distance of the action closer to the monitors depth, which make it a lot easier to play. To get convergence, you do have to enable the advanced keyboard shortcuts, and use ctrl F5 and F6.
It may be that it hurts your competitive gaming some, but the immersion is much higher. Last play through Metro 2033, I turned off laser sites and crosshairs, and force myself to look down the barrel of the gun and it just added that much more realism.
In first person shooters, I also find it's required to use Nvidia's laser sites (ctrl-F12), unless the game fixes the laser site itself. Otherwise you'll find the laser sites are at the depth of your monitor and the target may be much further in, causing focusing issues (although more like real life aiming).
In games with 3rd person perspective, like Diablo 3, targets far away have the same issue, but with the use of convergence, you can bring the distance of the action closer to the monitors depth, which make it a lot easier to play. To get convergence, you do have to enable the advanced keyboard shortcuts, and use ctrl F5 and F6.
It may be that it hurts your competitive gaming some, but the immersion is much higher. Last play through Metro 2033, I turned off laser sites and crosshairs, and force myself to look down the barrel of the gun and it just added that much more realism.
Powered by Unigine Engine
Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic
FPS:
48.9
Scores:
1233
Min FPS:
26.7
Max FPS:
83.5
Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:
Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 965 @ 3.20GHz
CPU flags:
3207MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 8.961.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render:
direct3d10
Mode:
1680x1050 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
4x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled
Tessellation:
disabled
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2012
Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic
FPS:
48.9
Scores:
1233
Min FPS:
26.7
Max FPS:
83.5
Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
Operating system:
Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 965 @ 3.20GHz
CPU flags:
3207MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 8.961.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render:
direct3d10
Mode:
1680x1050 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
4x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled
Tessellation:
disabled
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2012
Triton05 said:
http://i47.tinypic.com/2ywv8lz.jpg@1254 - Mhz boost // mem@ +250
updated pic, if I go any higher, I get artifacts.
nice scores! added to the list, you might want to oc your cpu a little. Leaving a 2500k at stock is a waste if you ask me.
shamsmu said:
]http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/6674/captureukm.pngFinally managed to overclock my gpu with asus gpu tweak. Its not a huge increase but an increase nonetheless.
What is your boost speed? Also, what drivers are you using. Im trying to figure out why Im trailing you a bit.
Thanks! ( 1254Mhz boost +90 core and +250mem ) with MSi Afterburner. Im also running the R300 Beta drivers still.
Triton05 said:
What is your boost speed? Also, what drivers are you using. Im trying to figure out why Im trailing you a bit. Thanks! ( 1254Mhz boost +90 core and +250mem ) with MSi Afterburner. Im also running the R300 Beta drivers still.
I have got 1171boost clock and 7000mhz memory clock. Thats about it. Asus gpu tweak doesnt let you control the core clock. Yeah your scores should be way higher than mine considering an i5 2500k @4.5ghz would annihilate an i5 760 at 4ghz.
shamsmu said:
I have got 1171boost clock and 7000mhz memory clock. Thats about it. Asus gpu tweak doesnt let you control the core clock. Yeah your scores should be way higher than mine considering an i5 2500k @4.5ghz would annihilate an i5 760 at 4ghz.Has to be driver releated. Im running the Beta's that were released back in the beginning of May.
thats about right your gpu score is about 50 higher than mine. IMO the problem with 3dmark is, the gpu usage is always between 80-90%. it never hits the 95-99%mark.
matto17secs said:
Here's a GTX 580 at 835 mhz core/2049 (4098) mhz memory:http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3927/83520491050.png
nice score matto17secs added to the list.
shamsmu said:
]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/84/capturebtj.pngI know the thread is a bit old but my scores increased quite a bit once I switched to sandy bridge i5 2500k 4.5ghz with cooler master hyper 612pwm
Well, that's pretty eye opening. Is that saying that Intel on-board graphics is waaaaay faster than a GTX 580?
By the way, I OC'ed my CPU from 2.93 mhz to 3.75 mhz and only gained about 20 points over my previous score.
matto17secs said:
Well, that's pretty eye opening. Is that saying that Intel on-board graphics is waaaaay faster than a GTX 580?By the way, I OC'ed my CPU from 2.93 mhz to 3.75 mhz and only gained about 20 points over my previous score.
yeah you better switch to intel 3000 asap lol!
nah its still my gtx 670 only slightly overclocked (+20mhz core clock)
yeah these new sandy bridge cpu's never cease to amaze me. I got 100+ more points after switching from a 4ghz i5 760 to a 4.6ghz i5 2500k. bf3 fps never drops below 80fps O_o
Hello everyone,here is my score with Asus gtx 670 non top at 1180 core clock and 7150 memory clock:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/507/img0252w.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/507/img0252w.jpg/
mazvydas said:
Hello everyone,here is my score with Asus gtx 670 non top at 1180 core clock and 7150 memory clock:http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/507/img0252w.jpg/
that is some nice overclock! what was your voltage settings?
Related ressources:
- ForumIs my XFX 7950 double d heaven benchmark score normal?
- ForumUnigine Heaven 3 .0 MSI R7950 Test
- Forum[GTX 670] Low Heaven Benchmark Score
- ForumUnigine Heaven Benchmark v2.1 score ....comments??
- ForumBenchmark on 3 dmark11 and Heaven DX11
- ForumHow's my Heaven Benchmark score ?
- ForumHeaven/3 dmark11
- Forum6950 2gb Heaven Benchmark Score : 839
- ForumHEAVEN BENCHMARK SCORES
- ForumHow is my Unigine Heaven Benchmark Score ?
- ForumWill a PCIe 3.0 card work in a PCIe x16 slot?
- Forum[Solved] Sapphire 7970 3dMark 11 scores
- ForumHeaven DX11 Benchmark Results.
- ForumAbnormally Low G3D Mark Scores - CPU Bottleneck?
- Forum[Solved] 3dmark11 scores
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!






