FX8150 to FX8350 is it worst it? Tags: CPUs Battlefield Last response: December 13, 2012 1:02 PM in CPUs Share re-play- December 13, 2012 12:34:03 PM Hi, i have a FX8150, and seeing some reviews and it look like PD its better than BD like 10-15% depending on the game or app. some of u guy that went from FX8150 or FX8120 to FX8350, did u see any increase on your GPU usage? and less spikes at least on BF3 or Starcraft2? for example my FX8150 at stock keep my XFX 7950 on BF3 usually from 85% to 90%. would i be able to get higher GPU usage upgrading to the FX8350? according to Techreport, the FX8350 expend less time after the 50ms and that leads to a better gameplay (smoothness). but talking in real world usage, would i notice a difference? thanks More about : fx8150 fx8350 worst hytecgowthaman December 13, 2012 12:55:16 PM U r want to upgrade from 8150 to 8350 Its waste of money.reason spend $100 for to get 100mhz. thinkable. m 0 l BuddiLuva a b à CPUs December 13, 2012 1:02:20 PM The grammar on this thread is appalling. Anyways, yes there is a difference from the 8150-8120 to the 8350, despite what the person above says, and no it is not just 100mhz difference. The architecture has been tweaked quite a bit. m 0 l Can't find your answer ? Ask ! Publish Related resources SolvedIs there a big difference between the FX-8150 and the FX-8350? Forum SolvedAMD FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHZ VS AMD FX-8350 Vishera 4.0GHz? Forum More resources Read discussions in other CPUs categories AMD Intel Intel i5 Intel i7 Phenom Cooling Performance !