Alright, Let me start off by saying the GTX 480 is a great performer at a great price point. It would suit the needs of most 1080p gamers at a very attractive price.
However, with the frequency of recommendations for this specific card from our friend recon-uk. I think it is important to point out a few things.
recon regularly (and rather aggressively) denies that the GTX 480 is loud or hot. While he does admit that he uses an aftermarket cooler, it isn't always one of the first things he mentions. He'll post his benchmarks to show the performance and temperatures, only later revealing that there is an aftermarket cooler involved.
recon goes into more detail about his card here.
Many users may want to put an aftermarket cooler on their card. The a custom cooler on a 480 would address the two biggest concerns with that particular GPU (heat and noise) and make it a better choice than the 570. However, most of the people who would do this, would already know what they want and not come to a forum asking for advice.
While the 480 may not be noticeably louder than other reference designs, it is still loud, as are most single-fan rear exhaust systems. It IS hot without aftermarket cooling however.
Toms Hardware
AnandTech
Guru3d
TechSpot
TechPowerup
This can put a serious damper on potential buyers going on a hope to overclock to beat out the competitors it gets pitted against like the 7850, 7870, or 570 (sometimes 670 as well). All of these cards run cooler and will overclock very well even without custom cooling. That said, at stock clocks, it beats all of its competitors in its price range, but people shouldn't buy with dreams of sky high overclocks without being aware of the potential (likely) thermal limitations of the stock cooler.
I wouldn't usually post a thread like this, but with how often recon (often aggressively) recommends the GTX 480 to users here, I thought it was important to throw all the facts together.
recon, since I'm sure you'll visit,
The 480 at $220 (or $210 as it was for a while) is an exceptional value. I am not invalidating your recommendations, but I do see you in most of the threads asking for GPU advice dropping the 480 recommendation, without enough context. It is still a good recommendation, but it is significantly less attractive when you add the price of a custom cooler along with the fact that you will void your warranty by removing the factory cooler. I'm not asking you to stop recommending the card, I just ask that you include the proper context, and please be less hostile with the other forum members who offer different advice than yours.
Other commenters, please don't harass recon for his recommendations, that isn't my intent for this thread. There's nothing wrong with recommending a product you love.
Sorry for the long read, but I've said what I came to say.
Happy teching!
Blade
Edit: Had written "should buy with dreams.." meant "shouldn't buy with dreams..." Whoopsie.
However, with the frequency of recommendations for this specific card from our friend recon-uk. I think it is important to point out a few things.
recon regularly (and rather aggressively) denies that the GTX 480 is loud or hot. While he does admit that he uses an aftermarket cooler, it isn't always one of the first things he mentions. He'll post his benchmarks to show the performance and temperatures, only later revealing that there is an aftermarket cooler involved.
recon goes into more detail about his card here.
Many users may want to put an aftermarket cooler on their card. The a custom cooler on a 480 would address the two biggest concerns with that particular GPU (heat and noise) and make it a better choice than the 570. However, most of the people who would do this, would already know what they want and not come to a forum asking for advice.
While the 480 may not be noticeably louder than other reference designs, it is still loud, as are most single-fan rear exhaust systems. It IS hot without aftermarket cooling however.
Toms Hardware
AnandTech
Guru3d
TechSpot
TechPowerup
This can put a serious damper on potential buyers going on a hope to overclock to beat out the competitors it gets pitted against like the 7850, 7870, or 570 (sometimes 670 as well). All of these cards run cooler and will overclock very well even without custom cooling. That said, at stock clocks, it beats all of its competitors in its price range, but people shouldn't buy with dreams of sky high overclocks without being aware of the potential (likely) thermal limitations of the stock cooler.
I wouldn't usually post a thread like this, but with how often recon (often aggressively) recommends the GTX 480 to users here, I thought it was important to throw all the facts together.
recon, since I'm sure you'll visit,
The 480 at $220 (or $210 as it was for a while) is an exceptional value. I am not invalidating your recommendations, but I do see you in most of the threads asking for GPU advice dropping the 480 recommendation, without enough context. It is still a good recommendation, but it is significantly less attractive when you add the price of a custom cooler along with the fact that you will void your warranty by removing the factory cooler. I'm not asking you to stop recommending the card, I just ask that you include the proper context, and please be less hostile with the other forum members who offer different advice than yours.
Other commenters, please don't harass recon for his recommendations, that isn't my intent for this thread. There's nothing wrong with recommending a product you love.
Sorry for the long read, but I've said what I came to say.
Happy teching!
Blade
Edit: Had written "should buy with dreams.." meant "shouldn't buy with dreams..." Whoopsie.