Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Right at the beginning your page annoys me....there are no pixels in a
camera...pixels have not physicality. Why teach beginners something you will
have to unteach them later?
--
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com) freebridge design group
www.route611.com & Route 611 Magazine
<ron@ronbigelow.com> wrote in message
news:1125464853.770244.63470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>I have written Part I of an article titled "Why Raw". The article can
> be found on my web site at:
>
> http://ronbigelow.com/articles/raw/raw.htm >
>
> Other articles can be found on my site at:
>
> http://ronbigelow.com/articles/articles.htm >
>
> Comments are always welcome.
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Gene Palmiter" <palmiter_gene@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:irBRe.11388$um2.9576@trnddc03...
> Right at the beginning your page annoys me....there are no pixels in
> a camera...pixels have not physicality. Why teach beginners
> something you will have to unteach them later?
It would in general be helpful to stick closer to ISO terminology;
sensor array, sensors, and for image output (after CFA color
reconstruction or RGB filtering) either achromatic or tri-chromatic
color pixels.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.